Posted by uncensored > 2021-12-25 11:39 | Report Abuse

stockraider liar little pinky communist,

Please answer my question ok?
1. why evil things in USA linked with evil in China ???

2. Why the evil things that happen in China got anything to do with evil in USA ?

3. Are you admitted that all those evil things happened in USA also happened in China ? As you always like to compare evil things in China vs America.

Posted by stockraider > 2021-12-25 11:40 | Report Abuse

No need to explain to this very low intelligence uncensored mah!

Explain he also cannot comprehend mah!


Posted by uncensored > Dec 25, 2021 11:39 AM | Report Abuse

stockraider liar little pinky communist,

Please answer my question ok?
1. why evil things in USA linked with evil in China ???

2. Why the evil things that happen in China got anything to do with evil in USA ?

3. Are you admitted that all those evil things happened in USA also happened in China ? As you always like to compare evil things in China vs America.

Posted by uncensored > 2021-12-25 11:41 | Report Abuse

stockraider liar little pinky communist, hahhhahha

low IQ f..o...o..l can't answer a simple questions

Posted by stockraider > 2021-12-25 11:42 | Report Abuse

Enough lah!

Uncensored very boloh loh !

Posted by uncensored > 2021-12-25 11:44 | Report Abuse

ya lah perumpuan tua tak ada otok untuk jawap soalan hahahah

Posted by uncensored > 2021-12-25 11:46 | Report Abuse

Eastern686 so are you going to answer ? let everyone her to see how sound are your mind is ?

Posted by uncensored > 2021-12-25 11:46 | Report Abuse

Eastern686,

Please answer my question ok?
1. why evil things in USA linked with evil in China ???

2. Why the evil things that happen in China got anything to do with evil in USA ?

3. Are you admitted that all those evil things happened in USA also happened in China ? As you always like to compare evil things in China vs America.

Posted by uncensored > 2021-12-25 11:50 | Report Abuse

another mile stone achieved 2016 comments

HaHaHa

Posted by uncensored > 2021-12-25 13:35 | Report Abuse

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=glD19c7HWX8


【被黃標】公安介入「禁止過洋節」！原央視主持人周濤，調任保利藝術總監；地產文藝是副業，軍火是保利主業；封城是習江鬥？江派在習家鄉造勢；稚童送真心祝福，整個警局

Posted by uncensored > 2021-12-25 14:00 | Report Abuse

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V21Tbiv0FJ4

上將劉亞洲被抓内幕，中共內鬥激化；應對台海戰爭，美日作戰計劃細節曝光；美國工作簽證H-1B明年免面談；日本不派官員參加北京冬奧會；北美防空司令部報告聖誕老人已通過台

Posted by uncensored > 2021-12-25 14:01 | Report Abuse

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oxP2fAqamZQ

China's "No solution Don't care" culture

Posted by uncensored > 2021-12-25 14:18 | Report Abuse

NOW I understand why Eastern686 & stockraider liar & qqq3333 silly man can't answer my questions below.

BECAUSE they are WHITE WHORSHIPPER !!!!


My questions:

1. why evil things in USA linked with evil in China ???

2. Why whenever someone mentioned the evil thing that happen in China, the little pinky communists always want to mentione that evil things also happened in USA to counter or in defense of the evil happened in China? Most of all they all stayed in Malaysia not in USA...hahaha

3. Are you all admitted that all those evil things happened in USA also happened in China ? As you always like to compare evil things in China vs America.

Posted by uncensored > 2021-12-25 14:28 | Report Abuse

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LfJiU9tE-WA

The Foreigners Who Take Advantage of Chinese Nationalism

There is a group of foreigners living in China that are taking advantage of the nationalism in China, and provoking some very unreasonable sentiments, all to get clout/money in China

Posted by uncensored > 2021-12-25 14:37 | Report Abuse

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RPxaaJhmRzo

中共权斗激烈！佟丽娅再婚高官传闻坐实；躲不过 中国房地产最糟时期还未到来；拜登签署法案后 传沃尔玛中国下架新疆产品（《万维读报》211224-2 FTCC）

Posted by uncensored > 2021-12-25 14:46 | Report Abuse

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6OIM4tFOBww

【熱點訪談】哈佛教授涉中共「千人計劃」被美國定罪！ 是否起到風向標作用？ 美國是否存在更多同類涉案专家還未被起訴？ | #新唐人電視台

Posted by uncensored > 2021-12-25 14:50 | Report Abuse

Harvard professor charged with lying about China ties goes on trial

BOSTON, Dec 14 (Reuters) - A federal jury was selected on Tuesday in the trial of a Harvard University nanotechnology professor accused of lying to U.S. authorities about his ties to a China-run recruitment program and concealing funding he received from the Chinese government.

The Boston jury will return on Wednesday to hear lawyers deliver opening statements in the trial of Charles Lieber, an ex-chair of Harvard's chemistry department charged in the highest-profile case to result from a U.S. crackdown on Chinese influence within universities.

Lieber, 62, has pleaded not guilty to six false statement and tax charges. His lawyer, Marc Mukasey, has said Lieber "didn't hide anything, and he didn't get paid as the government alleges."

Prosecutors charged Lieber in January 2020 as part of the U.S. Department of Justice's "China Initiative" it started during former President Donald Trump's administration to combat Chinese economic espionage and research theft.

President Joe Biden's administration has not backed away from the initiative, despite critics who say it went too far in pursuing academics and that it overly targeted Chinese nationals.

The first trial of an academic - a Tennessee professor - ended in a mistrial and later an acquittal by a judge. Prosecutors this year dropped charges against six other researchers.

A Justice Department review of how it approaches countering threats posed by China is expected to be completed in the coming weeks, agency spokesman Wyn Hornbuckle said.

Prosecutors said Lieber in 2011 became a "strategic scientist" at Wuhan University of Technology and through it participated in a Chinese recruitment drive called the Thousand Talents Program.

U.S. authorities say China uses the program to entice foreign researchers to share their knowledge with China in exchange for perks including research funding.

As part of the program, the Wuhan university gave Lieber more than $1.5 million to establish a Chinese lab and agreed to pay him $50,000 per month plus $150,000 in annual living expenses.

Prosecutors said Lieber lied to investigators about his involvement in the program and also misled Harvard, which in 2019 told the National Institutes of Health that he was not involved with it.

Posted by uncensored > 2021-12-25 15:44 | Report Abuse

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jSdB2MxEciM

习近平的龙椅坐得安稳吗？他接李克强的班 习总最放心；2024大选 川普恐有劲敌？美国H-1B等非移民签证 明年申请可免面谈（《万维读报》20211224-3 FTCC）

Posted by Up_again > 2021-12-25 16:39 | Report Abuse

I don’t think what happens in Xinjiang is genocide
Just like one day if Malaysia kumpul all the Malaysians that cannot even speak Bahasa in camps for 3 years to educate them and make sure they can converse fluently. It’s all for the greater good

Posted by Up_again > 2021-12-25 17:08 | Report Abuse

China doesn’t deny the education camps exist. I don’t agree with Western media that these are forced labour camps.
So if it’s good for China, and following what you and stockraider keep on mentioning and propagating, should be great for Malaysia too.
The government just have to conduct interviews, perhaps during booster appointments. If they can’t converse in Bahasa, like China, free transport is provided. No worries la, the great template sudah ada. Ikut sajalah

Posted by Up_again > 2021-12-25 17:19 | Report Abuse

Ability to converse only, nothing to do with race. Why suddenly bring in race profiling and making it racial. Look at the brighter side, the government can actually copy and paste the promotional material used in China. Change mandarin to bahasa saja

Posted by mkmike > 2021-12-25 17:25 | Report Abuse

Guess who is funding the Australian Strategic Policy Institute (ASPI), another institution behind the Xinjiang GENOCIDE accusations?

ASPI is a defense think tank funded by weapon manufacturers and the U.S. and Australian governments, and they will benefit the most if chaos breaks out.

ASPI Funding 2020-2021:

Department of Defense core funding (37%) - Major funder
Federal Goverment Agencies (25%)
Defence Industries (3%)
Others (55%)

Posted by Up_again > 2021-12-25 17:31 | Report Abuse

No worries, @mkmike
The government here don’t need funding from US to do education camps here. Pretty sure the majority of tax payers would agree

Posted by uncensored > 2021-12-25 17:46 | Report Abuse

Ya camp reserved especially for little pinky communists ...hahaha

Posted by Up_again > 2021-12-25 17:50 | Report Abuse

@uncensored
Nope it’s not an ideology or morality standards camp
This is just a proposal going around, to invite all Malaysians that cannot even converse in the National language. Written Tak payah la, nanti 6 years in camp also cannot graduate.
To pretty much less follow what’s been done in China since it really is impressive.

Posted by uncensored > 2021-12-25 17:54 | Report Abuse

Eastern686 & stockraider liar & qqq3333 silly man they are worshipping the WHITE. Sub conscious they believed the WHITE are more superior than them hence they need to criticise the WHITE in order to come to defend China...hahaha

Posted by trading2019 > 2021-12-25 18:05 | Report Abuse

That little pinky communists have lifted nearly 800 mln people out of poverty. That speaks volume!

Posted by mkmike > 2021-12-25 18:12 | Report Abuse

qqq3333, agree. That's why many have been infected with the 1D10T variant.

Posted by mkmike > 2021-12-25 18:24 | Report Abuse

You can hardly find homeless people lurking around in the big cities. China has hundreds of vocational schools (the West calls them detention camps) all across China, not only in Xinjiang. The homeless are being trained and equipped with skills and knowledge as we speak. Yes, the Chinese government can be quite authoritarian in some aspects but it's for the better good of the people. I've lived in China for some years.

Posted by mkmike > 2021-12-25 18:26 | Report Abuse

I always tell people, you don't have to believe me. Just go and see for yourselves. There is no need to argue or debate.

Posted by Sslee > 2021-12-25 18:40 | Report Abuse

If the system of government is based on meritrocacy with leave no one behind (LNOB) then that country will prosper.

Posted by uncensored > 2021-12-25 18:41 | Report Abuse

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/ajes.12324

Homelessness and the Universal Family in China

Read the full text
About


Share on
Abstract
Depending on how one defines homelessness, China has either a very tiny homeless population or an extremely large one. Compared to other countries, there very few vagrants: people living on the streets of China's cities without means of support. But if one counts the people who migrated to cities without a legal permit (hukou), work as day laborers without job security or a company dormitory, and live in overcrowded and unsanitary conditions on the edge of cities, there are nearly 300 million homeless. Free market fundamentalism is responsible for the emergence of this sort of homelessness in China. We review China's recent new policies to tackle homelessness and offer suggestions based on the traditional Chinese wisdom, which includes the concept of the universal family (family - tian xia). Homelessness in China must be addressed as a cultural problem caused by the breakdown of ancient methods of social integration. Treating it merely as a housing deficit will fail.

Posted by uncensored > 2021-12-25 18:42 | Report Abuse

Little pinky communists always like to hypnotised themselves into believing things that is not real....hahaha

Posted by uncensored > 2021-12-25 19:00 | Report Abuse

自欺欺人

Posted by mkmike > 2021-12-25 19:01 | Report Abuse

Thank you. I'm reading the whole article, not just the abstract.

Posted by mkmike > 2021-12-25 19:17 | Report Abuse

This is an excerpt from the conclusion:

For Chinese people, development is not a process carried out by individuals. Rather, the spiritual core of the Chinese people is development on the basis of belonging. The government has begun programs that will reintegrate city and countryside. In the process, it will provide a home for those who have been left behind in isolation in villages and for migrants who have never fit into the culture of cities. To have a home—to belong—requires more than just enough food and shelter. It also requires a chance to participate in building one’s own culture. That is the governance path now being followed to enable homeless people to transform their lives together into new forms of settlement. Since the homelessness that arises from large-scale migration to cities is a problem in many other developing countries, China’s answer may help other countries find a solution to homelessness associated with urban development.

Posted by mkmike > 2021-12-25 19:21 | Report Abuse

Can you believe, I just paid USD 42 to download the above recommended article? My wife thinks I'm nut. But I don't like to read half baked articles and then quick to jump to a conclusion like many people do.

Posted by uncensored > 2021-12-25 19:31 | Report Abuse

https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpubh.2021.679429/full

The Homeless People in China During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Victims of the Strict Pandemic Control Measures of the Government

Background: By implementing aggressive control measures, China has rapidly and effectively controlled the Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. However, the neglected homeless population may become victims of that perceived success. Due to political sensitivity, we know little about them.

Aims: This study aimed to investigate how the pandemic and the pandemic control strategies of the government affected the lives of the homeless people in mainland China.

Methods: A total of 103 eligible participants experiencing absolute homelessness were recruited from Guangzhou City during July and August 2020. Surveys measured demographic characteristics including health status, changes in daily living, and actions of the government toward the homeless during the pandemic. Sankey diagrams and ordered logit regression models were used to examine the impact on the homeless of inhumane government efforts to drive the homeless away. Qualitative materials were analyzed by using an inductive approach to provide more details.

Results: First, the homeless people in Guangzhou tended to be male, aged 40 to 64 years, less well-educated, and they originated from outside Guangdong although they were living in the city center. Most had little connection with their families. After a long period of homelessness, almost half of the participants were in poor health with various conditions, which made them extremely vulnerable to COVID-19. Second, the pandemic caused a substantial decline in incomes of homeless people, had less of a negative impact on their food intake, and affected sleep time in different ways. Third, during the COVID-19 pandemic, humanitarian aid from local governments of China decreased, whereas inhumane efforts to drive the homeless away intensified. Fourth, quantitative models and qualitative materials demonstrate the devastating effect of the strict pandemic control strategy of the government on the lives of homeless people, which may further cause their health problems.

Conclusion: This study for the first time illustrated the characteristic features of the street homeless population in mainland China and their living situation during the COVID-19 pandemic, and most importantly demonstrated the devastating effect of the strict pandemic control of the government, which has been considered a great success in previous studies, on lives of homeless people. Urgent measures should be taken to ensure the protection of the homeless population and prevent an impending humanitarian crisis.

Introduction
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), which was caused by the novel coronavirus SARS-CoV-2, was first identified in Wuhan City, Hubei Province, China, in late December 2019, and has now spread rapidly around the world. According to the WHO Coronavirus Disease Situation Dashboard, there had been more than 133.14 million confirmed cases globally and more than 2.88 million deaths by April 12, 2021. The numbers continue to increase rapidly as we are writing. During these challenging times, academia played a crucial role in combating COVID-19 and has published many articles related to the pandemic, and the number of published articles is rapidly accumulating. However, the existing literature pays inadequate attention to the homeless, who are considered the most vulnerable group to COVID-19 (1–5). The limited literature on the homeless focuses more on introducing or proposing various strategic measures and policy implications to support the homeless population during the COVID-19 epidemic (6–16), describing the characteristics and outbreak of COVID-19 in homeless shelters (17–20), or addressing the mental health status of the homeless during the pandemic (21–23). There are hardly any exploratory efforts and no evidence to show the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and the pandemic control strategies of the government on the lives of the homeless in China. The economic and social disruption caused by the COVID-19 pandemic brings an unprecedented challenge to the lives of everyone. However, the homeless are more vulnerable and have been particularly impacted by the pandemic and the actions of the government (24), such as extremely unstable living situations and the lack of a living wage and savings. This group, therefore, require

Posted by uncensored > 2021-12-25 19:34 | Report Abuse

This group, therefore, requires additional support.

In mainland China, due to the imperfect relief policy for the homeless, they are often treated unfairly and carelessly. On the other hand, public opinion has gradually shown more and more attention to non-humanitarian experiences, which can easily lead to scandals that may damage the positive image of the party and the government (25–29). In this context, the homeless have become a highly politically sensitive issue. As a result, public discussions and academic research on disadvantaged groups have been suppressed, and the homeless have been ignored. There is minimal literature on the homeless in China, and the existing studies focus mainly on mental illness (30–33). To the best of our knowledge, there is no survey-based study that attempts to examine the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, particularly the impact of the strict pandemic control measures of the government on the lives of the homeless in China.

Although the COVID-19 pandemic has been traumatic, if the government implements strict pandemic control measures which prefer inhumane actions rather than humanitarian aid, it may cause devastating damage to the lives of the homeless. In mainland China, the government manages the homeless in cities in three ways: sending them back to their hometowns, providing them with temporary shelters, and driving them off. The first two actions seem humane because, under current regulations, the homeless own the right to accept or refuse assistance, and government staff can only provide advice rather than influence the homeless against their will (34). If the homeless give their approval, they receive free food, accommodation, and train tickets to their hometowns (34). However, during the COVID-19 pandemic, the government implemented strict lockdown measures to prevent the spread of coronavirus by closing off all villages and residential compounds nationwide. Thus, local governments stopped sending the homeless back to their hometowns. Meanwhile, the shelters were at high risk and under enormous pressure because the coronavirus could be rapidly and widely transmitted in homeless shelters (18, 20, 35, 36). In addition, the shelters had also been ordered to isolate all new entrants, which was another difficult task. Compared to the situation before the pandemic, shelters faced overwhelming demand that extended far beyond the need for bedding (37). As a result, local shelters lacked the will and the ability to help the homeless during the pandemic.

The humanitarian aid provided by the government was reduced while efforts to drive the homeless away intensified. The intensified eviction efforts were the most striking feature of the pandemic control strategy of the Chinese government for the homeless and had been adopted by governments at all levels across the country during the pandemic (38–41). Under the guidance of aggressive pandemic prevention and control, local governments expelled the homeless to prevent cross-infection caused by the integration of the homeless in densely populated city centers. Meanwhile, eviction efforts of the government also prevented the homeless, who live by collecting garbage, from being infected by household garbage of unknown origin. In addition, under the pressure of the “hold-to-account” system, which imposes immediate and harsh sanctions for negative results of local government pandemic control (42), local officials feared being punished or fired for the increasing number of COVID-19 cases. Since the homeless was one of the most vulnerable groups to COVID-19, and few people care about them, driving the homeless away from jurisdictions became the best option for local governments.

Therefore, as a result of strict pandemic control measures, many of the homeless in China may not be able to return to their hometowns or find shelter. Critically, during the pandemic, the government may continue to expel the homeless. Scholars have credited the success of China in controlling COVID-19 to aggressive control measures (43), but the perceived success may conceal the huge sacrifice of the neglected homeless. Although the Chinese government claimed that they took the initiative during the pandemic and successfully helped the homeless by searching the streets each day. We doubt whether they had sufficient government personnel to do this as they were already facing serious staff shortages before the pandemic (34, 37, 44).

With little aid but intensified eviction efforts, the living conditions of the homeless people may be worse. Thus, we hypothesized that the strict pandemic control strategy of the government toward the homeless, which preferred driving the homeless away rather than providing humanitarian aid, had a devastating impact on the lives of homeless people.

This study aimed to investigate how the pandemic and the pandemic control strategies of the government affected the lives of the homeless people in mainland China. To achieve that g

Posted by uncensored > 2021-12-25 19:39 | Report Abuse

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pKQ9qQLVlyo

Where did China's poor people go? Did China really get rid of poverty?


China Insights
131K subscribers

In 2016, a Chinese official announced that China had 98.99 million rural poor in 2012, based on the standard set by the Chinese Communist Party. According to the CCP, those who make less than 2,300 yuan a year, or around $350 US dollars, are considered poor. But there is a big gap between China's poverty standards and the standards used internationally.

Posted by uncensored > 2021-12-25 19:44 | Report Abuse

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZBuD5SnbVvA

聚焦城市流浪者:餐饮一条街捡剩饭为生的穷苦人，北京土著竟也无家可归(小叔TV EP078)

小叔TV

在北京火车站附近的崇文门有这么一群人，每天捡饭馆剩饭吃, 有的一呆就是几年。这次受托于一位美国华人朋友的金钱帮助，“健身哥”和我将为两位在首都流浪者买饭吃，并和他们简单攀谈，了解他们的真实处境。

Posted by uncensored > 2021-12-25 19:47 | Report Abuse

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TyZyXrIgugw

无家可归的中国人

Posted by Up_again > 2021-12-25 20:01 | Report Abuse

Great, everyone agrees that educational camp format must be implemented in Malaysia too. This should foster better unity
The economy will also prosper

Posted by Sslee > 2021-12-25 20:08 | Report Abuse

Migrate workers from rural area to town for job oprtunities are problems face by every country become of geological uneven developments. At least currently China is shifting the development to western part of China include Xinjiang and Tibet by building transportation infrastructure and internet connectivity. But then why then the West so against all those developement and now US pass a law to ban Xinjiang products.

Know why the West so againt the development of palm oil but keep silent on development of others seasonal seed oil that required much largest land use.

I myself is migrate expat from Malaysia to Indonesia in oil palm industries and I had this to say to the West.

Oil palm tree cultivation in Indonesia had brought development into rural area by:

1.Direct employment opportunities (Every 10 hectare 1 direct employment) which in turn support direct employee whole family livelihood.
2.Plantation development brought in much needed infrastructure and amenities facilities (Road, banking system, mini-market, medical, school and etc)
3.Plantation companies provide support, finance and management know how for private own small holders.
4.Plantation activities generating others economic activities for local communities and allow local small business to flourish.
5.Plantation water reserve area and fire fighting team readily available water resource to fight any bush/forest fire during severe drought situation.
6.Plantation companies's conservation and rehabilitation program on HCV areas to restore and preserve the beauty of flora and fauna at its pristine natural environment.
7.Plantation companies (RSPO) commitment for sustainable and responsible planting and to protect the forest reserve area and animal sanctuary.
8.Plantation companies bringing development/employment/economic activities to empower rural local communities so that less people migrate to big town for employment thus lesser the infrastructure stress on big towns.

So my questions what benefit have cultivation of other seasonal oil crops had brought to the local communities besides benefitting the rich owner, bank, fertilizer, weed killer and seed supplier? How much of these harmful chemicals will eventually going into river system? And per hectare basic, base on mass balance of carbon atom your cultivation activities had absorbed how much of C02 from the atmosphere compare to oil palm tree cultivation.

Posted by Up_again > 2021-12-25 20:09 | Report Abuse

@qqq3333

Yeah man totally agree with you. Like you said, what’s done in China must be implemented here too
Follow the format saja, I do prefer if a referendum is done to at least get what Malaysians think, but like you always say it is going to be very messy
But then again, as you mentioned China has shown us that there is no need for that at all

Posted by Sslee > 2021-12-25 20:15 | Report Abuse

I have no problem to speak in Bahasa Malaysia and many current non Malay Malaysans are also very well versed in Bahasa Malaysia.

By the way my children also score A in their SPM Bahasa Malaysia examination. Know actually how many kelantan Malay fail their Bahasa Malaysia SPM exam?

Posted by uncensored > 2021-12-25 20:18 | Report Abuse

qqq3333 I am reponding to little pinky communist said "You can hardly find homeless people lurking around in the big cities"

But why you mentioned about USA ???????????


Please answer my question ok?

1. why evil things in USA linked with evil in China ???

2. Why whenever someone mentioned the evil thing that happen in China, the little pinky communists always want to mentione that evil things also happened in USA to counter or in defense of the evil happened in China? Most of all they all stayed in Malaysia not in USA...hahaha

3. Are you all admitted that all those evil things happened in USA also happened in China ? As you always like to compare evil things in China vs America.


>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Posted by qqq3333 > Dec 25, 2021 8:04 PM | Report Abuse

uncensor....don't talk to me about China's problems.....watch this.......

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5iPDxjocKOw


Living in China vs Living in America - This is truly shocking..

US biggest fear ........... what happens when Americans find out the truth about Xinjiang...........that in race relations, in peace and harmony .........China far more successful than America.

Posted by Up_again > 2021-12-25 20:24 | Report Abuse

@sslee, not sure why do you have to single out a race from a state. As mentioned, the goal is just mandatory conversational skills. Don’t think any exams are needed to ascertain that.
You will be amazed how effective this is when we group a big number of people, with actually not much of a choice to do anything else other than mandatory classes. Don’t think the country needs more than two years to do this.

And like you say, if many can speak then the camps won’t be that big of a scale. Maybe like 50% of National Service scale, which won’t even cost much considering how much we spend on other budgetary items

Posted by Up_again > 2021-12-25 20:30 | Report Abuse

@qqq3333

You really sure we should follow exactly China’s model for protection of minorities culture?? I still want to use chopsticks occasionally

Posted by Sslee > 2021-12-25 20:50 | Report Abuse

@ Up_again,
You need to speak to kelantanese to know are they speaking Bahasa Malaysia?

Posted by Up_again > 2021-12-25 20:53 | Report Abuse

Converse in Bahasa la, don’t have to ban all dialects or versions of it. Why so extreme? If follow what you want, we need lots of education facilities in the whole Borneo