Once I did my research & analysis for CCB, after reading tradeview's article, I feel very excited as much as I found Gadang through icon8888's article.
The stock meets all my criteria of stock selection.
While waiting Gadang to truly reflect its fair value, CCB's price is still at the early stage & has much bigger room.
This is a company managed by reputable Jardine Fleming who is famous for their corporate governance and business acumen. Not Chinaman company who claims to have big huge cash pile but cannot even pay single sen of dividend.
Najib Zamry, I think I misunderstood you, you are talking companies from China. Yes, totally agreed, AVOID from investing any China companies. You will suffer all kinds of possible corporate issues from these companies.
I dont really understand why out of a sudden this co can post very good Q results...they have been struggling like hell for the past few years...the emergence of Hap Seng Star few years ago makes the competition worse and erosion in profit margin..how come suddenly become so good...are they selling some car models which are not being distributed by Naza n Hap Seng Star??
Bro murali, good result is because much higher number of mercedes sold this year - coz their introduce some new models that are well received by market this year
Hi guys...just wanna ask - most the of the TP price quoted here (range from RM4 to RM5) is based on PE & EPS valuation. The problem is that FY2015 is the best year for CCB. I believe that if we based our TP of RM4 based on the best performing year (2015), then, what happens if CCB cannot sustain their EPS performance for FY2016?
What i am trying to say is that we are using a past performing PE to judge the future share price. Then, we adjust the PE multiple from 7 (current P/E) to future PE of 10. What justifies this adjustment?
No doubt - the guys from Mercedes is saying 2016 is going to be comparable or better than 2015. But the macro economics outlook does not support this. I am not an expert in cars - so , i cannot comment on the automative industry. Indeed, i just drive around in a 1995 proton wira.
Assuming if PE is just 8. Let us not compare the PE of CCB with UMW (Toyota) or other car Korean Cars or Japanese Cars distributors as what Superman99 has done. THey are serving the mass market whilst CCB is serving a premium high end market. Assuming if we reduce the EPS from $0.55 (annualised per SuperMan 99) to $0.40. This will only generate RM3.20 which is considered fully priced in by the market now.
I do not know which PE to attribute to CCB. Of course, if we use a PE of 10, then RM4 is easily acheivable assuming if FY2016 will generate RM0.40 EPS.
In summary, what i am trying to say is that PE = 6.18 = share price of RM3.40/ EPS of RM0.55 (annualised) = 6.18 However, this EPS is based on the best performing year 2015. Assuming if we maintained this PE of 6.18, for the share price to remain constant , then 2016 needs to be operating at this level of EPS RM0.55 to justify this share price.
So, what is the most reasonable PE to use and what is the expected EPS for next year? Assuming if we use an EPS of $0.40, and a PE of 8, then, we can achieve RM4. But then, how do we justify a PE of 10?
Let's talk about market perception on PE, if look at all companies in bursa, every company will have different PE ratio. Even companies within the same industry may have different PE as well.
First of all, PE 10 is my target price, not my estimation on how the stock should go, you may have your own target price over CCB, say7, 8 or 9, I am ok with it anyway, as there are hundreds of people out there selling their CCB shares now at the current price/PE.
I can't decide for market & I do not think I have any authority or power to convince everyone to accept my view, or else, the price should have gone limit up on 31/12/2015 then.
I just want to share how I get it & hope you can understand my basis, agreeable or not, it is your choice. As I say in article, you are welcome to disagree. (I did mention in my article)
Mr Market is the one who will decide what is the right PE should go for a particular company. (Though Benjamin Graham & Warren Buffett always think that Mr Market is always changing its mind or view on all stocks day in day out.)
Why I use historical average PE for the stock? Because that was the market view for the stock over the past years.
I have no idea why CCB is trading at lower PE than other car distributors, but I think everyone can put up as many assumptions as he wants to explain on the situation. I don't think I will spend my time of doing that.
Same goes to Gadang, I have no idea why Gadang was dropped from RM2 to RM1.16, then went up again to RM2.15, all happened within 6 months. All I can say is Mr Market is so unpredictable.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ I use the same basis of calculation to find out that CCB match my all criteria.
When Gadang & CCB are doing very well year after year for past few years, the PE is getting lower at the same period of time, then it is very interesting to me, it is where I see it as an opportunity to invest.
I think I have mentioned many times in various forums that first thing comes to my mind is the safety of my hard earned monies. Low PE is always providing good Margin of Safety.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ I make good money from reading Icon8888's articles on Gadang in i3 forum & after doing my own homework. I think CCB is another good opportunity to me & I would like to return the same favour to i3 forum users by sharing my homework done on CCB.
Hope everyone can see what I see, I may not correct anyway & you should responsible & liable for your own action & do your own homework if you decide to invest in CCB after reading my CCB article.
The market is not going to reward you for buying low PE in such stocks. You want to buy the low PE game....go for KYY stocks....all those under covered small stocks and suddenly profits shoot up. Ccb kind of stocks only interest me when real crisis and very high PE.
I need to amend for what I said previously, apology:
When Gadang & CCB are improving for past few years and even though the price has increased, the PE is indeed getting lower during the same period of time, then it has become interesting to me, it is where I see it as an opportunity to invest.
This ...I agree . it is quite true that the P/E has dropped throughout FY2012 to FY2015. As a matter of FAC, the cash conversion cycle gas improved during FY 2014 and FY2015. I have performed the computation and will share via Google doc. But then, I am quite worried about the no. If Mercedes Benz that they will sell next year 2016.
At superman99, it seems the are able to pay off the RM90M banker acceptance in FY2014 is mainly due to - converting the entire tarfe AR into cash payment, very high AR turnover and low AR turnover days, - not spending much on their inventories since there is a build up in FY2013. Hence, they just run down the inventories in FY2014.
However, the have managed their AR, AP and inventories quite well during FY2015. I will share more in the Google Docs.
However, now there is a concern about how many mercedes Benz they can sell next year.
Kancs, I truly like this kind of discussions with various supporting facts and I sincerely believe you must have done the study & homeworks before giving your ideas & statements. (I know it judging from the way you are talking... :)
To look or study at CCB, the following are the important areas to consider: 1. Business model and market advantages 2. Management team 3. Cashflow management 4. Stock price (vs historical prices) 5. Current market conditions 6. Future market conditions
I will discuss the above in a seperate article in due course.
Meanwhile, i wish to highlight that no one had predicted Mercedes Benz can do so well in 2015, except may be salesman in their showrooms? XD
I have to admit that I am not good in predicting future market and that's why I never state my assumption for future growth, except for the next Quarter only.
My next year target for the sale of Mercedes Benz is 0-10% growth. Eventhough with that, it should be good for re-rating by market, I believe.
definitely not an expert in car...indeed - i drive around in a beaten down 1996 Proton Wira...hahaha
But from a layman's perspective - the market for Mercedes is definitely niche - very high end sort of market.
For the C-class, it is not fair to compare mercedes with Hyundai, Mazda, Honda (all those korean and japanese brands) - it is an insult to the brand.
Mercedes must be compared against Audi, BMW and Volvo, those continental brands specifically targeted for the high end, exclusive and niche market segment.
I think Mercedes is actually competing against these 3. Then, we have a fair comparison.
The total available market (TAM) is indeed the summation of Mercedes, Audi, Volvo and BMW.
Please exclude volkswagen (it is the people's car (tank) in germany - hahaha).
I am not car expert as well, I personally believe Mercedes, BMW & Audi are same class, Volvo & Volkswagen are targeting different segments.
Every man is definitely having his own dream cars, mine are Ferrari, Mercedes & BMW, plus Toyota Camry.
For car market, model design is very important, it decide whether you make it or not. Few years back when BWM released its current 5 Series model, I have been keep dreaming of having it one day in future. Mercedes? Forget it, such a old lady model type then.
Same goes to Honda City, the current model is selling hot because the design is brilliant! Toyota Vios is losing its ground.
Look back this, results 2012,2013. The profit is so unstable! Is now the mgt team still same? If same what makes you think this situation will not happen again?
Buddies in this forum already here for long time, i trust they will have their own judgement based on your explanation & highlights, thank you, paperplane.
I will write an article to talk about up & down of CCB way back to 2003 in due course,
I must admit that CCB surprised me last year rising +76%, as I didn't expect the turnaround to be so sudden.
Well, I guess the counter has paid me for my patience during these two years after I slowly bought on the way down after my FIRST purchase @ 2.62 in July 2013.
This book is the result of the author's many years of experience and observation throughout his 26 years in the stockbroking industry. It was written for general public to learn to invest based on facts and not on fantasies or hearsay....
Najib Zamry
892 posts
Posted by Najib Zamry > 2015-12-30 14:51 | Report Abuse
Superman 99, you can google it.....type malaysia car sales or you can go to Paul Tan website.