kikikikikiki...downtrends... if only economy downtrends, the stock market may only go up!!... u see DAX, DOW JONES last few yrs...and now JAPAN!... All up becoz ecomony problems... kikikikikikiki...
negative PE stock, research houses don't even want to touch punting based on rumours and speculation is not a strategy, it's gambling if want to gamble can go to i3gamblers.com
kikikiki, another round of bjauto placement wth approx 192 mil rm and massive share buy bak today...11341...kikikiKiki... runtuh bjcorp??? aiyoo.. putus harapan lo... kikikikikikiki
20 May 2014: placement price RM 2.0 for total 14.25%, raise RM 230m 16 Jun 2014: placement price RM 2.27 for total 1.34%, raise RM 24.5m 20 May 2014: placement price RM 2.27 for total 1.14%, raise RM 20.88m 10 Nov 2014: placement price RM 3.20 for total 6.19%, raise RM 160.18m 11 Nov 2014: placement price RM 3.20 for total 0.12%, raise RM 3.02m 25 Nov 2014: placement price RM 3.20 for total 7.42%, raise RM 192.0m
In total, Bjcorp place out total 30.46% stake in Bjauto, reduce stake to 36.74%. Bjcorp raise total proceed of RM 630.6m and realize TOTAL GAIN RM 528.63m, translating into gain of 12.7sen /bjcorp share
Just over last 6 month, bjcorp have gradually materialize its assets into cash, together with Bjauto share placement for total RM 630.6m (gain 528.63m) and land disposal for RM 760m (gain RM 136m), Bjcorp have liquidize these investment for RM 1.39 bil total cash. These cash of RM 1.39 bil enable Bjcorp to strengthen its balance sheet significantly, boosting its cash hoard, reduce borrowing and more importantly, Bjcorp manage to realize total gain RN 665m from just these two investment, translating into gain of 16sen/share.
Many have wonder why Bjcorp is not realize EPS gain in Bjauto IPO at 70sen and later on its first major placement in 20 May after IPO, divest 14.25% at RM 2.00/Bjauto share for RM 230m and realize gain RM 188m. The reality is that Bjcorp through series of share exchange with original shareholder, Bermas Motor to control 67% of bjauto in conjunction with Bjauto IPO. Therefore, Bjcorp itself have NOT realize any gain yet in the IPO. The first Bjcorp manage to realize its investment gain in Bjauto is through first placement after Bjauto IPO, and have realize gain RM 188m (4.5sen/share). But, these realize gain is have not translate into increase EPS in Q1 (1 May-31 July).
Lets me clarify, this is because Bjcorp still hold 53% stake in Bjauto despite the first placement of 14.25, therefore, Bjauto still remain as Bjcorp subsidiary. According to the current accounting standard, The realize cash proceed in subsidiary company is taken directly to the Bjcorp reserve, which essential mean that the realize cash proceed of RM 230m is take into account in Bjcorp increase in reserve, increase in total equity fund and net asset increase from RM 1.24 to 1.30. The gain of RM 188m for the placement is also reflect in Bjcorp increase in cash hoard.
Therefore, in summary, despite the actual gain from placement of RM 188m or 4.5sen/share, but it is not reflect in Bjcorp EPS in Q1 due to the fact that Bjauto still remain as Bjcorp subsidiary.
(Remark: It cause disappointment in Bjcorp investor after seeing Bjcorp report miserable EPS in Q1)
However, situation now have change, Bjcorp have subsequently continue place out Bjauto share, reducing further its stake from 53% to current 36.74%, changing Bjauto from subsidiary status, becoming a associate company of Bjcorp. Therefore, all these latest gain from placement will be record in Bjcorp next upcoming Q3 (1 Nov - 31 Jan), estimate realize gain to reflect in Bjcorp EPS is 7.2sen/share.
(Remark: Investor prefer to judge company based on handsome EPS rather than need to read through balance sheet to see company increase in reserve, equity, cash balance or net asset)
happy or not? I believe more to come .... 1) Cosway! 2) Ritz Carlton! 3) Sales of BJFood 4) Cash out more lands or properties! 5) List of his environmental business 6) Toto Vietnam Kick off... and etc... kikikikikikiki.... 7) Casino, for me... it will not be a good news!... but definitely not the 1) Coffin, 2) Con man! 3) Cheating! kikiki
One thing, I read that many investors / reporters / even analysts (yes, how horrible !!) still not sure whether MOL is in fact their subsidiary or associate, or has any link with BJ Corp at all due to cunning corporate structuring by VT ...... Mr. hng33, can you shed some light ?
Most of the financial news I read, never says that MOL is anyhow linked with BJCorp, mostly linking MOL to VT or Johor Sultan, despite strong advocate from our "top i3investor guru" Calvin Tan that it is somehow linked to BJCorp ....
hng33, I truly salute you for your detailed work but more importantly your BRILLIANT INCISIVE insights and comments arising from your research work. IF one goes through the management comments in Q2 2014 report , the management of BJCORP had already expressed confidence that the year end report on 30/4/2015 will be GOOD!!!
BJCORP had already started its turnaround starting Q2 2014.It's fundamentals will improve significantly in the near future. That is the reason why I had invested in BJCORP as this is another of my turnaround stock selection. My basis of decision is as follows: - BJCORP had taken 3 years to bottom out - It is now in sideways consolidation. The longer the sideways consolidation, the stronger will be the trend reversal - Its fundamentals started to improve starting Q2 2014 and will improve further in the near future. - Price Downside at current price levels is VERY LIMITED but PRICE UPSIDE will be quite SIGNIFICANT the longer it consolidates at current price levels
hng33, if I were not wrong, should BJCorp has management control over BJAuto, BJCorp can still classify BJAuto as subsidiary, right? Also, even if BJAuto is to be classified as associate, the gain will not show in quarter report to be presented in December, but only the one to be presented in March, given that the disposal has just be completed, right? thanks, your thorough work, either in Puncak or BJCorp, are really helpful
when we invest i believe its important to know who helm it, vt ,he has vast business experience and the might to bring it up, might in the form of money and talent and to me, most important of ,actively , WHOLE HEARTEDLY building up this bj empire. what more do you want , price at real low , huge assets and an experience captain almost sure of bringing in positive business development kikikikikiki
MOL will reschedule the qtr results announcement on 1-12-2014... closed at 4.09, discount of approx 65% from the lPO prices of 12..... Tan Sri likes FB story!.. kikikikikiki .. if 3395 return is only 20 to 25%... how abt MOL???.. kikikikikiki.. Great Warrior will conquer MOL...kikikikikiki
For MOL, if i m not wrong... 3395 has minor stake into it thro one of his subsidiary... ocoz Tan Sri has most of the shares, The MOL founder and also recently, Baginda Sultan Johor...
ACT 125 COMPANIES ACT 1965 (REVISED - 1973) PART I - PRELIMINARY
Section 5. Definition of subsidiary and holding company.
(1) For the purposes of this Act, a corporation shall, subject to subsection (3), be deemed to be a subsidiary of another corporation, if—
(a) that other corporation—
(i) controls the composition of the board of directors of the first-mentioned corporation;
(ii) controls more than half of the voting power of the first-mentioned corporation; or
(iii) holds more than half of the issued share capital of the first-mentioned corporation (excluding any part thereof which consists of preference shares); or
(b) the first-mentioned corporation is a subsidiary of any corporation which is that other corporation's subsidiary.
(2) For the purposes of subsection (1), the composition of a corporation's board of directors shall be deemed to be controlled by another corporation if that other corporation by the exercise of some power exercisable by it without the consent or concurrence of any other person can appoint or remove all or a majority of the directors, and for the purposes of this provision that other corporation shall be deemed to have power to make such an appointment if—
(a) a person cannot be appointed as a director without the exercise in his favour by that other corporation of such a power; or
(b) a person's appointment as a director follows necessarily from his being a director or other officer of that other corporation.
(3) In determining whether one corporation is a subsidiary of another corporation—
(a) any shares held or power exercisable by that other corporation in a fiduciary capacity shall be treated as not held or exercisable by it;
(b) subject to paragraphs (c) and (d), any shares held or power exercisable—
(i) by any person as a nominee for that other corporation (except where that other corporation is concerned only in a fiduciary capacity); or
(ii) by, or by a nominee for, a subsidiary of that other corporation, not being a subsidiary which is concerned only in a fiduciary capacity, shall be treated as held or exercisable by that other corporation;
(c) any shares held or power exercisable by any person by virtue of the provisions of any debentures of the firstmentioned corporation or of a trust deed for securing any issue of such debentures shall be disregarded; and
(d) any shares held or power exercisable by, or by a nominee for, that other corporation or its subsidiary (not being held or exercisable as mentioned in paragraph (c)) shall be treated as not held or exercisable by that other corporation if the ordinary business of that other corporation or its subsidiary, as the case may be, includes the lending of money and the shares are held or power is exercisable as aforesaid by way of security only for the purposes of a transaction entered into in the ordinary course of that business.
(4) A reference in this Act to the holding company of a company or other corporation shall be read as a reference to a corporation of which that last-mentioned company or corporation is a subsidiary.
That is not true, to be subsidiary of the holding company, it must control at least 50% stake. Take for example, IGB is associate company of Goldis, as it control 32% stake, and only equity account for IGB earning despite IGB management control by Golids. But, after Goldis increase stake to 73% in IGB, it is now a subsidiary of Goldis and it can fully consolidate IGB earning in Goldis financial accost but minus minority interest 27%.
I agreed, many people here either purposely or confusingly mislead that MOL is subsidiary/associate of Bjcorp. The true is, MOL is control by VT and is his private investment and list now in NASDAQ. It can consider as sister company of Bjcorp as both share common major shareholder. Similarly, neither 7-eleven nor U-mobile are subsidiary/associate to Bjcorp, Both of these 7-eleven and U-mobile are control by VT BUT not Bjcorp. But, again all consider as sister company. The fact that, as sister company, BJcorp have to seek shareholder approval in AGM for related company transaction with MOL, 7-eleven and U-mobile. That all, they are have business relationship but never a ownership relationship.
Take for example, PJdev, OSK and OSK properties, all control by same major shareholder, therefore, their relationship is sister company, and related transaction buiness need share holder approval. It is until recently, the major shareholder initiate take over PJ dev, OSK prop to consolidate them under OSK control, becoming subsidiary or associate own-ship relationship.
This book is the result of the author's many years of experience and observation throughout his 26 years in the stockbroking industry. It was written for general public to learn to invest based on facts and not on fantasies or hearsay....
datuk
4,935 posts
Posted by datuk > 2014-11-25 16:29 | Report Abuse
Super great angpow in the line For wiser Iinvestors
Kikikik