Posted by probability > 37 minutes ago | Report Abuse
you take out dividend, this stock is trading at 4.50 now
It has delivered EPS even better than what was estimated and yet, purely because of wrong perception on the meaning of the two clauses below, market is thinking it will revert back to its earlier earnings.
Cash flow hedge & Cost of hedging reserve
From what i have extracted and studied, these are nothing but the effects of the Refining margin swap contract.
Cash flow hedge (CFH) are basically hedge portions of the RMSC which has been liquidated as of 30th June and awaiting respective physical market transaction to take place to offset these hedging losses.
Whereas, Cost of hedging reserve (COHR) is simply the following:
Forward looking Mark-to-market estimate of the difference between the fixed price and the future spot price multiplied by the notional quantity and discounted back to a present value based on a reasonable discount rate determined by the producer.
Even if we assume the RMSC covers complete Gasoline production capacity of 35% yield x 10.6 million, 3.7 million barrels, you are securing the below gross profit after hedging losses or gain.
= 3.7 million x 12.7 USD/brl x 4.45 ex = 209 million MYR.....(1)
No matter what the figures are reported on CFH & COHR, they are purely trying to show the ineffectiveness / effectiveness of the hedging but the profit contribution remains the same. (SERIOUSLY, THINK ABOUT THIS)
The CFH shows how much 'opportunity for greater profit than 209 million / per qtr' is confirmed loss while COHR shows potential loss if the scenario prolongs indefinitely for the balance notional value.
For every negative value on CFH & COHR that will take place, there will be equally higher gross profit in future physical market transaction where after deducting the hedging loss anticipated, you will report the same 209 million for gasoline per qtr.
For the balance refined products diesel, jet fuel and others (10.7 - 3.7 = 7 million barrels per qtr) , you have the following:
1. Diesel at 46% yield, cracks USD 50.36/bbl 2. Jet fuel at 7% yield, cracks USD 38.40/bb 3. Rest of product yield at 12%, using Mogas 95 cracks USD 7.77/bbl
Gross refining margin/brl:
= (0.46 x 50.4 ) + (0.07 x 38.40) + (0.12 x 7.77) = (23.18 + 2.70 + 0.93)/ (0.65) = US $ 41.2 / brl
Gross Profit :
= (7 million barrel sales per qtr) x ( US $41.2/brl) x (MYR 4.45/USD) = 1.283 Billion MYR........(2)
Total gross profit after hedging gain / loss: (1) + (2) = 1.483 Billion MYR
Fallen in love to self calculation, under self denial state despite many warning sign ahead. Stubborn and insistance to keep continuing post unverified calculations, trapping more and more innocent people to support. Pity
Ular gardening pun ada received msg on HY qtr report leh. So cham leh. Minus 213 sen kah. no eyes liao. The facts and figures turned up is fake leh. Esok mau pecah rm4.20 liao kah. Ular also cannot help you all liao leh. Haiyoh. Correct?
Ok liao. No more pin point siapa is correct or wrong leh. Anyway this is just a tilikan only. Enuf bashing others lah. Only can say no one forced anyone yo follow their tilikan lah. Ok. Haiyoh. Boleh?
If wrong this time then try again next time only. Ok. No one is perfect also leh. Ok boh. Especially those very often kutuk others one leh. Esok mau run road or catch falling kapak is up to you hor. Anyway Ular also cannot catch the falling kapak leh. What a waste leh. Case study punya pasal. Haiyoh. Correct?
Petron corp and Petron M alreadg give warnning result ahead. Many investors if take advice should have sell earlier, but too bad many seem trap till now due to continue unverified calculations to show how fantastic uocoming reeult, how different compared to Petronm, how smart hengyuan hedging strategy will be..... misleadingly other to witheld waiting for so call big reward. Too bad, too late now
The recorded loss of RM756mil for 3Q 2022 was attributable to adverse refining margin as compared to a more favourable refining margin during 3Q 2021. Adverse refining margin was mainly affected by sharp reduction in cracks especially for Mogas, coupled with higher crude premium incurred as well as higher stockholding losses due to significant drop in product prices during the quarter. These factors led to a net loss for 3Q 2022
MM is right afterall about HRC. I will automatic disappear from HRC forum.
sslee, what happened to your hedging assets/ liabilities calculations which I didn't even bother to read because there is no foundation to the calculations. every thing is just based on imaginations.
qqq3 the diesel market price Q3: NYMEX Singapore GASOIL PLATTS Futures Historical Data Time Frame: Daily 07/01/2022 - 09/30/2022 Highest: 165.88 Lowest: 127.33 Difference: 38.55 Average: 138.86 Change %: -26.98
From HRC Q3:The rise in revenue for the current quarter (“3Q 2022”) was supported by a 51% surge in the market product prices at an average price of USD124 per barrel.
I do not understand the purchased is about USD16 per barrel hihger then market products pricec at average price of USD 124 per barrel.
So most likely Chinaman manipulate reasult and siphon out the money.
MM, My apology on derivatives realised/unrealised loss/gain calculation. My calculated refining margin swap contracts realised/unrealised gain/loss were based of mogas92 but it look like HRC actually hedged on Diesel and not on Gasoline.
Your wish of limit down tomorrow will be fullfill as prove you are right all this while and I am dead wrong.
This book is the result of the author's many years of experience and observation throughout his 26 years in the stockbroking industry. It was written for general public to learn to invest based on facts and not on fantasies or hearsay....
BobAxelrod
8,255 posts
Posted by BobAxelrod > 2022-11-29 17:05 |
Post removed.Why?