1) On Aug 16 2014, StarOnline reported that the Executive Chairman (EC) said its sales target for the year ended 13/12/2014 was RM1 billion and 75% of that already achieved. KSL's half year revenue was RM428 million with and net profit of RM140 million. NET profit margin at 32.7%. This means that there was RM572 million of sales and net profit of RM187 million from PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT were coming during the 2nd half year ending 31/12/2014. Add in the recurring income from Hotel and Mall of RM49 million and what the EC was effectively saying was that RM236 million NET profit was expected in the 2nd half year. That was why KSL's price sky-rocketed. But what was the actual result reported? The third quarter net result was RM70 million which INCLUDED RM22 million of Hotel and Mall income. The fourth quarter result, reported in Feb 2015, smacked of a suspicious repeat of the corresponding quarter reported in Feb 2014. Reported Net income for the quarter was RM130 million. But RM88 million was fair value adjustment i.e. asset revaluation of their Investment properties in Hotel and Mall (they are not allowed to revalue properties held for development because of tax implications). After deducting income from from Hotel and Mall of RM27 million, KSL net income from property development was only RM15 million as against expectations of RM93.5 million (187/2) based on the EC's statements to StarOnline. The total income from property development in the 6 months to 31/12/2014 amounted to RM63 million as against RM187 million based on EC's statement to StarOnline as reported on 16/8/2014. This massive discrepancy was what caused the massive sell-down in Feb 2015. But this did not explain the massive double sell-down in Dec 2014 which should have been cushioned by the generous 5 sen dividend which extends to new bonus 1 for 1 issue, both with ex-date end of Dec 2014!
2) So what's in IT for the KSL insider bangsats? Your guess is as good as mine!
3) The double whammy, in February 2014 and February 2015 are what make investors wary as the February 2016 reporting date nears. Would it be ang pow or holland for KSL's investors?! 19/01/2016 16:18
That was why I have been saying that KLSE should investigate KSL. The evidence are staring them in the face if they care to analyse. The sell-down and buy-back data are all in the KLSE system. All KLSE's Market Surveillance Unit need to do is to key in the selection criteria and the system will generate the reports for investigation i.e. if the KLSE's trading system is as good as some systems that I know. Such reports should be standard to the system. And share buy-back support is to support the share from speculation so that the share price reflects the fair value. KSL's share-buy-back (unlike Matrix's) did not do this. Why?! KSL share buy-back looks more like a sandiwara to me!
If it is KSL Klang Mall you are referring to, it is a work in progress and it's income is recurring and in cash and receivables. So it is harder to manipulate. It's the income from property development that is easier to manipulate quarter to quarter!
SC should investigate this kind of bullshit talks by the company's key man as their statements or views may have impact over the share price. Any incorrect or misleading statements should be taken serious actions.
hng33 got very good instincts and discipline. I wish I've got more of that. His motto seems to be that if his stock do not rise within 3 trading days, he sells.
Huge support at 1.25! I deleted some of my earlier posts because I do not want contribute to depressing the market. I feel the the market has already priced in what I have written earlier!
nearly eliminated all exposure to all markets (only one company left in klse portfolio) . This can go both ways. I would rather stay on the sidelines for now.
next budget must be one that will spur public spending and encourage high impact projects. Infrastructure and property development have great multiplier effects...developers with good size and strategic landbank at lower cost will be first to benefit..the govt is still committed to providing housing for the masses and with GE 2018 nearer..no other government stimulus initiative is more effective than the property development..
I apologies for the late reply. I haven't really looked into the budget. For now my focus is more macro. Yet, any changes to the way Labuan is structured will be bad for big names on the market. (See Malaysian Satay)
briefly;
1- I expect the fed to fold tonight, which as you know will produce the same effect as the ECB. But at the same time, I cannot be sure maybe they will hike up again (unlikely but possible) .
2- Yuan will be devalued in the medium short term. Followed by what amounts to 15% devaluation through 2016. (almost guaranteed).
The way I see it: Participation in KLSE now is not advised as there is a lack of clarity. but if you must,
1- long term holding ("KSL", "Asiapac", maybe... "Fiamma") based on when you enter.
2- Short term calls (bullish outlook) on KLSE (FBMKLCI-C12 is the most "reasonably" priced call warrant at this time)
3- Short term puts (bearish outlook) (FBMKLCI-HN is the most "reasonably" priced at this time)
And if you really want to laugh... compare crude and brent futures prices. to the "OPEC basket"
I should add that if you foresee more QE coming in the next 1-6 months... FBMKLCI-C40 (Bid: 2.5 sen: value 0) is the option with the highest risk/highest return. HOWEVER, It's more like gambling at that point.
In a nutshell, China and Russia have been demanding reforms in global affairs. IMF, UN, Security Council, etc. As of now, these supranational institutions are very skewed towards the west (competing interest as you put it). So, while on the surface it might seem economical factors, it is political factors that are driving the "markets" for "now".
NOOb. The US dollar, to my mind, is USA's most powerful economic weapon and related to it, the US's market. How then is China 'indirectly flexing muscles'? By threatening a Yuan devaluation?
@NOOb. Big oil spike coming? Are you referring to production or price? With so much oil in the market, China slowing and Iran due to put at least 600K BPD into the market, a 'big oil spike' would likely be in output, not in price.
This book is the result of the author's many years of experience and observation throughout his 26 years in the stockbroking industry. It was written for general public to learn to invest based on facts and not on fantasies or hearsay....
upsidedown119
4,326 posts
Posted by upsidedown119 > 2016-01-19 16:31 | Report Abuse
choonyong & steady88. Here are further analyses.
1) On Aug 16 2014, StarOnline reported that the Executive Chairman (EC) said its sales target for the year ended 13/12/2014 was RM1 billion and 75% of that already achieved. KSL's half year revenue was RM428 million with and net profit of RM140 million. NET profit margin at 32.7%. This means that there was RM572 million of sales and net profit of RM187 million from PROPERTY DEVELOPMENT were coming during the 2nd half year ending 31/12/2014. Add in the recurring income from Hotel and Mall of RM49 million and what the EC was effectively saying was that RM236 million NET profit was expected in the 2nd half year. That was why KSL's price sky-rocketed. But what was the actual result reported? The third quarter net result was RM70 million which INCLUDED RM22 million of Hotel and Mall income. The fourth quarter result, reported in Feb 2015, smacked of a suspicious repeat of the corresponding quarter reported in Feb 2014. Reported Net income for the quarter was RM130 million. But RM88 million was fair value adjustment i.e. asset revaluation of their Investment properties in Hotel and Mall (they are not allowed to revalue properties held for development because of tax implications). After deducting income from from Hotel and Mall of RM27 million, KSL net income from property development was only RM15 million as against expectations of RM93.5 million (187/2) based on the EC's statements to StarOnline. The total income from property development in the 6 months to 31/12/2014 amounted to RM63 million as against RM187 million based on EC's statement to StarOnline as reported on 16/8/2014. This massive discrepancy was what caused the massive sell-down in Feb 2015. But this did not explain the massive double sell-down in Dec 2014 which should have been cushioned by the generous 5 sen dividend which extends to new bonus 1 for 1 issue, both with ex-date end of Dec 2014!
2) So what's in IT for the KSL insider bangsats? Your guess is as good as mine!
3) The double whammy, in February 2014 and February 2015 are what make investors wary as the February 2016 reporting date nears. Would it be ang pow or holland for KSL's investors?!
19/01/2016 16:18