Comparing DKSH with another similar company Harrisons holdings I cant help but realize a few things:
1. both the companies are at a terminal value, the profits and revenues are both stagnating, with no growth triggers in place other than a population growth rate (and inflation rate). Basically, if you look at both companies, if you put inflation, GDP and interest rates into consideration, DKSH and Harrisions have basically been the same company. Stuck.
2. Both companies further exacerbate this by paying a huge amount of their profits as dividends. Your only play in buying these companies is not for the share price increase, but a measly 3.75% and 5.33%, as the money coming out as dividends show that they find no better way to invest in company growth.
3. There is however a silver lining. DKSH made an offer of 480 million for Auric. DKSH is punished by their debt fueled purchase of auric, and the market is punishing them as such. Whether this is unfair punishment, or a brilliant play, remains to be seen. I dont know how profitable the manufacturing of melange can be, or if DKSH can pivot its growth by doing VSS of unnecessary double entry of staff, but definitely doing something is better than doing nothing.
4. Anyone who buys DKSH just for a measly dividend is better off not investing in stock market. Anyone who buys a stock just because it seems lowly priced without understanding the long term effects of auric revenue/earnings generation is just a speculator.
Someone who can understand the logic of a company with a networth of 530 million paying 480 million for its value proposition growth in revenue and earnings in 5-10 years? Now thats called investing.
If right issue 481m to buy a PE 23 company and no guarantee profit you guy will know what is gg , mean year return only 4.3% , put your money in bank more better .
maybe yes maybe no, do you know how much auric earned in singapore the last 10 years growth? if you do know its a simple of addition and subtraction and estimation. In either case private limited companies dont normally show their P&L to just about anyone,
maybe potential ghost knows how much auric 5 year equity growth is worth and can share the info to i3 community? I'm sure you have read through it extensively right?
Pls take note due to the DKSH holding company & institution investor already hold more than 75% of paid up capital,i guess there are only 40000 Lot (1000/lot) flouting / trading in the Market.
Now everybody concern about loan 485 mil to acquire Auric Pacific,if from the holding company point of view,if this acquisition is worthy to growth their asia business,they dont mind to invest large amount at the right time.2.If we convert RM485mil into swiss dollar,it only 120mil.For holding company share price Swiss 72 dollar(RM300 per share),this capital expenses only 10 persent of its annual revenue. This happen to Digi when Digi Swiss (Holding) ciompany acquire majority share from Berjaya,less than 5 years ,the return is few 100% from the original investment. Reconsider before invest.take your own risk
From the circular to shareholders, Estimate PAT Auric Pacific(M) for 2018 ~ 25m DKSH buying price = 485m Estimate return of investment = 25/485 = 5.15%
DKSH funds the buying cost entirely by bank borrowing, bank interest would eat up almost all the profit .... in near term, also facing risk of good will /impairment ....
DKSH will back to RM3 soon because look like no resistant between RM2.60-RM3.20.Plus if quarter result OK and EGM approved Auric Pacific,this is the bonus for this counter.Still remember what i said RM486 mil is a peanut in the eye of DKSH holding.They are eyeing economic boom in 3 year time.
Profit is down,but cash in hand keep on increase to RM100mil,this is the ability of the swiss company to generate cash in hand.On the other hand,they not even ask money from us after EGM,this is what we call good company.
Look like someone knows even better than Board of Directors/Management of DKSH. The acquisition of Auric is profit enhancing for years to come. At the same time, helping DKSH to go further in expansion of business. Directors/Management believe they can generate better profit/income and cash flow than to service bank loans resulting from RM480 millions payout.
Now everybody concern about loan 485 mil to acquire Auric Pacific,if from the holding company point of view,if this acquisition is worthy to growth their asia business,they dont mind to invest large amount at the right time(During recession).2.If we convert RM485mil into swiss dollar,it only 120mil.For holding company share price Swiss 72 dollar(RM300 per share),this capital expenses only 10 persent of its annual revenue. This happen to Digi when Digi Swiss (Holding) ciompany acquire majority share from Berjaya,less than 5 years ,the return is few 100% from the original investment. Reconsider before invest.take your own risk 28/01/2019 20:59
CF TRADER,your focus point is on the acquisition price 485mil too high & profit per annum 25 mil too low.For FMCG business,it depend on the grow of the population & the increase of lower income to middle class income & the regconition of the product.My advise is for those who can hold at least 3 to 5 years.
Yes, i believe i know better. Would love to be proven wrong though.
==== Posted by chankp7010 > Feb 26, 2019 11:17 AM | Report Abuse
Look like someone knows even better than Board of Directors/Management of DKSH. The acquisition of Auric is profit enhancing for years to come. At the same time, helping DKSH to go further in expansion of business. Directors/Management believe they can generate better profit/income and cash flow than to service bank loans resulting from RM480 millions payout
If the acquisition is approved, its gearing will jump from current 0.05x to 0.9x. That is a very high leverage for a trading company that has a razor thin profit margin. With its average 5 years Profit margin of just below 1%, it may experiencing wider and frequent swing between profit and loss going forward. Expect more volatility ahead.
Post a Comment
People who like this
New Topic
You should check in on some of those fields below.
Title
Category
Comment
Confirmation
Click Confirm to delete this Forum Thread and all the associated comments.
This book is the result of the author's many years of experience and observation throughout his 26 years in the stockbroking industry. It was written for general public to learn to invest based on facts and not on fantasies or hearsay....
10154899906070843
4,791 posts
Posted by 10154899906070843 > 2019-01-23 14:42 | Report Abuse
Comparing DKSH with another similar company Harrisons holdings I cant help but realize a few things:
1. both the companies are at a terminal value, the profits and revenues are both stagnating, with no growth triggers in place other than a population growth rate (and inflation rate). Basically, if you look at both companies, if you put inflation, GDP and interest rates into consideration, DKSH and Harrisions have basically been the same company. Stuck.
2. Both companies further exacerbate this by paying a huge amount of their profits as dividends. Your only play in buying these companies is not for the share price increase, but a measly 3.75% and 5.33%, as the money coming out as dividends show that they find no better way to invest in company growth.
3. There is however a silver lining. DKSH made an offer of 480 million for Auric. DKSH is punished by their debt fueled purchase of auric, and the market is punishing them as such. Whether this is unfair punishment, or a brilliant play, remains to be seen. I dont know how profitable the manufacturing of melange can be, or if DKSH can pivot its growth by doing VSS of unnecessary double entry of staff, but definitely doing something is better than doing nothing.
4. Anyone who buys DKSH just for a measly dividend is better off not investing in stock market. Anyone who buys a stock just because it seems lowly priced without understanding the long term effects of auric revenue/earnings generation is just a speculator.
Someone who can understand the logic of a company with a networth of 530 million paying 480 million for its value proposition growth in revenue and earnings in 5-10 years? Now thats called investing.