i think can buy back jack-ass now...

this is precisely the reason why the stock market is the place to be now

I think those accumulated reasonable capital from local stocks...should venture overseas slowly with small capital first...to feel the depth of the water...at least for 6 months...before going heavy...

Icon, soojinhou...kindly post your recommendations in i3...
easy for part-time man like me to monitor in a single location.

wei..is that image really calvintan? but it matches the image i had on him quite closely!...really handsome man.

the singer who sang pen-pineapple-pen also looks similar i think...cant remember!

Posted by Icon8888 > Nov 19, 2019 1:58 PM | Report Abuse

that is Calvintaneng photo

========

start recommending overseas stocks here in i3 malaysia please, TQ

suggest to exit Jaks tomorrow - just gut feeling earnings wont be good this qtr and good earnings is still very far..far away

those very confident dedicated sifus should at least reduce their stakes
......
Posted by probabllity > Nov 14, 2019 12:43 PM | Report Abuse

Ok, i suggest whole of i3 members sailang on jaks now

makin angkuh dan makin liar....berkobar2 rangsangannya

Posted by SarifahSelinder > Nov 14, 2019 7:29 PM | Report Abuse

Sarifah berjiwa IPP unapologetic angkuh dan liar

Kedegilan sarifah berhasil juga akhirnya..

Ok, i suggest whole of i3 members sailang on jaks now

is tomorrow a trading day in Bursa?

quite confused as prophet birthday fell on saturday

yeah...i really hope they can capture more market share in indonesia... 264 million will one day be just as good as malaysians...

they have to.

just bought some this week...hope it goes up slow and steady..

Post removed.Why?

totally agreed..

Posted by Goh Kim Hock > Nov 4, 2019 9:27 PM | Report Abuse

What about Zakir Naik? I believe Jho Low not as dangerous as Zakir Naik.

confirmed under-declared earning for the last 2 years.

63 Million potential FREE earnings in FUTURE..

https://www.theedgemarkets.com/article/uzma-sues-two-companies-recover-overpayment-rm63m

The above article is 5 days old...market reaction is hilarious.

I guess the sum is a cumulative figure stretched over a period...it will not have any implications on current quarterly earnings...

Instead of reading it as 'overpaying'...one should read it as 'under-declared previous earnings' due to overpaying.

Think about it.

thanks, just to encourage responsible commentators like you..


Posted by i3Value > Oct 24, 2019 12:59 AM | Report Abuse

What you all talking about? Anyone got read the announcement?

This is not new PP. Only extend time for balance PP not yet subscribed.

I spoon feed you all.

1. 26/4/19: Bursa approve 256m new PP shares to be subscribed within 6 mths
2. 6/5/19: 215m subscribed at 89.5 sen each. Balance 41m shares not yet subscribe
3. 23/10/19: Bursa approval for balance 41m for subscription extend to 29/4/19

RM 3 coming..

0.53

0.63

last time PP at 0.83 ...now will be 0.73

LOL!

after all the prevailing information...and yet it did not move up..what makes u all think it will move up in the future..

totally agreed coolio!

thanks pjseow, you too!

Uzma sees improving prospects on expected rising capex

Saturday, 12 Oct 2019

https://www.thestar.com.my/business/business-news/2019/10/12/uzma-sees-improving-prospects-on-expected-rising-capex

Mr.Koon, i think you should now start allowing people to comment on your blogs. Nobody will give harsh stupid comments nowdays....its good for the brain to have two way communications....instead one way (selectively).

Calvin, can you post Koon's recent blog on his reply to recommended stocks. May be we all can recommend it in i3....

I think Monday it will definitely break RM 2. Simply because it has come bloody this far.....

Post removed.Why?

wondering if sudden rise in liquidity on Monday will raise selling force more than buying on Monday..

as the rise earlier was in anticipation of the positive effects of liquidity (market had already priced the good news)

good time to buy if it drops significantly

Made 100% gain here (but lost a lot elsewhere), thanks to your guidance pjseow and many other undisclosed sifus (teoct, coolio, etc)

i had to exit due to margin of safety tolerance (but this is all subjective).

my sincere appreciations to all

Posted by pjseow > Oct 12, 2019 8:51 AM | Report Abuse

Dayang is the most volatile stock I have ever invested in my 20 years investment history . Within 8 months , it can swing up 100 % ,down 50 % from the peak and swing back more than 100 % from the low . It is not for the faint hearted . You need very strong conviction on the fundamentals of the company . Otherwise , you will be " eaten " by the big fish . Many perished during the May and June period after the Right Issue announcement and bad QOQ but good yoy Q1 result . It was considered as bad news then . Today these same news are considered as good news .

Cant take care of people in your own country...kepo on myanmar, israel, and india now on how they treat muslims for what? Idiot country

one of the best recommendation from Koon...perhaps the only

Brent 60.41

this will be the champion of all O&G stocks soon....

either you buy now or never

TP 1.73 given by Publicbank

accelerated acquisitions...and IMO2020...Brent will soar in 2.5 months!

Aramco listing

too much growth potential

Time to whack Hibiscus!

Thanks to your feedback too sslee.

Just realized your reply Stockraider. Thanks

Hi Jason Toshi Ho, thanks for the attempt to explain...i totally agree with you on value creation - that is why we have GDP growth.

And money has to be in System as per the size of economy, else we will have deflation or inflation (if in excess). Its like addition of salt in growing stream of river (value) to maintain salinity level.

What i was actually trying to grasp was the mechanism the money is injected to the Circular flow of Money in a closed economy.

I am aware of the Interest Rate effects too.

As far i understand, either via reduction of interest rates or via quantitative easing by active purchasing of government bonds to inject money to the economy is still a BORROWING.

It is still a liability on a balance sheet of commercial bank (if it came from central bank via encouragement of borrowing, by interest rate reduction or even reduction of reserve ratio) or the bond issuer, where the borrowed money eventually has to be paid back from business profits.

If there no other way to inject it (i am not sure if there is), Revenue cannot indefinitely be higher than wages. It should balance to give net zero profit when the economy stops expanding.

This to me has a very deep ethical implication if one is truly concern for future generations.

economy appears like a growing child....and every time central bank injects money to the economy to avoid deflation, its like feeding food to his tummy for his hunger...

just that the child has to work later for paying back for the food given ahead...in the form of return from investment made from these borrowings.....

all sounds well as long he keeps growing...

If all government spending source is from taxation...then the only source of profit comes from pure Borrowings then... very much like what qqq3 said

thanks 3iii, i have done some self studying too from web info...

in a closed economy, there is no export or import or net export is zero, (X-M) = 0

that leaves GDP = Consumption + Investment from Savings + Government spending....(1)

and on Gross National Income, GNP = Income + Profit...(2)

Using equation (1) and (2), and at max possible Consumption rate , C = Income without any savings, the only source of Profit becomes Investment and Government expenditure then...

..................

GDP = C + I + G ...(1)
GNI = Inc + Profit...(2)

when C = Inc, at max consumption rate possible without any Savings. S = O...Investment from savings also becomes zero...

G = Profit

only source of Profit becomes Government expenditure or Investment from Savings or borrowings then...

that is why Investment by the Government or Central Bank injection is so crucial to sustain the capitalism game i guess

ahemm.....was guessing in that direction too..thanks for the little enlightening qqq3...sincerely.

feel free to enlighten more how the economy works....very interesting and essential to know indeed.

and yet we all talk about investment to make profit...

sifu raider, cheoky, 3ii, icon, qqq3...any of you can answer this?

businesses exist to make profit and all production from upstream to downstream has to derive the revenue eventually...from goods and services finally consumed by end consumer...

if the end consumer's source of income (source of money) is from the wages.....how can the revenue generated to businesses from their consumption ever be higher than the wages given to produce the consumables?