KLSE (MYR): JAKS (4723)
You're accessing 15 mins delay data. Turn on live stream now to enjoy real-time data!
Last Price
0.135
Today's Change
-0.005 (3.57%)
Day's Change
0.135 - 0.14
Trading Volume
2,179,500
41 people like this.
64,794 comment(s). Last comment by JeffreyFaimlyHistory 1 hour ago
Posted by Philip ( buy what you understand) > 2020-06-01 12:02 | Report Abuse
Posted by Philip ( buy what you understand) > 2020-06-02 07:23 | Report Abuse
Philip ( buy what you understand)
4,794 posts
Posted by Philip ( buy what you understand) > 2020-06-01 07:43 | Report Abuse
So, now that we have not 1 rights issue but 2 in recent years, with more dilution expected, the question becomes what happened to the money? The construction gains that was supposed to pay for the 30% ownership? Why are JAKS investors being asked to dilute in such a way right in the middle of MCO when price is at the weakest.
Can honestly say that management is acting in accordance to shareholders interest? Now with the underwriting and alp dilution to buy 50 million of shares at 40 cents in JAKS, have you ever wondered where alp is going to get the money to do such an activity?
Yes the PP is very straightforward. But you as the minority shareholder, have you received any dividend from JAKS before?
>>>>>>>>>
Posted by Windy1974 > Apr 5, 2020 3:52 PM | Report Abuse
Hi Philips. You are indeed knowledgeable and your argument is valid. Yes, I am a JAKS holder and i reckon it's always good to have such meaningful arguments. You invested in solid and well managed companies and I always believe it's not the sector but the management that's crucial. Eg. Layhong vs QL.
On your statement below. Obviously, you have gathered some infos. The PP is run by a reputable China company. So, the issue would be what gonna happen when the money come to JAKS. If the management doesn't act in accordance to shareholders interest, can we kick them out? From shareholding, ALP doesn't seem to hold majority in JAKS? Can I say that the business is PP is so straight forward that any professional CEO would get the result as expected?