andr......pls don't be a nerd....who's the sour grape? I'm not the one losing here. I'm just asking nerds like you to think rationally and logically rather than follow some of the idiots here like a blind bat. Get it??
Guys and ladies, dont attack my money god - Hobo please. When he/she appears, the share will show sign more accurate than the Oracle. I want to stalk him now. Wherever he goes if he says good i short, if he says bad i long.
Good morning guys,last friday didn't manage to try out Arbb iot machine, but the good thing is short meeting with Dato Liew, this year end or early next year special dividend is confirm guys! So better stick to the plan guys!
No worry lclwyp, this year still got many big PROJECTS yet to be announce........ SO that ARBB generate more revenue to sustain growth. Profit WILL rise even faster to ensure growth in EPS.Just wait for more of my dreams......
lclwyp TRD, Company needs to generate more revenue to sustain growth. Profit must rise even faster to ensure growth in EPS. Understand more and more conversion of preference share in the pipeline which will dilute EPS.
Of course it's best for Company to declare special dividend but I don't think it will be this year. Let's see who guess correctly. 26/05/2020 10:50 AM
woi dont go preditct the market like hobo la, it makes you looks like an idiot. If you can predict market you are wasting your time, go predict Toto 4d better
Remember not long ago hobotop says tomorrow Arbb price sure drop.....after tomorrow Arbb price suddenly surge up, You guys know what hobotop did? He delete his yesterday post, means this typo of person in real life, if he make mistake, he will sweep it off or even sweep it under the carpet.....like nothing ever happens......Guys just ignore hobotop, he's character or personality got HUGE PROBLEM!
TRD have long said, Arbb price under 0.40 just keep on sapu....So where is the fact that hobotop said?
RoboTop redredredred........because those idiots are already trapped at the top.....now they want to rope in more ppl to join their shithole. 27/05/2020 11:11 AM
Every investors knows Arbb price have not stable at 0.40, so who are you refer to trapped at the top? And why on earth someone wants to rope in more ppl to join their shithole? What did those people earn for doing this? Mind to explain hobotop?
Chinadragon, i can tell you even hobo himself can't explain, because he pakai tembak only....Earn absolutely nothing if those trap on top and wants to rope in others , i dun think someone will have the time to do this kind of thing except hobo! From his post seems like Hobo will do some bad deeds for free!
Twitter on Tuesday slapped a fact-check label on President Trump’s tweets for the first time, a response to long-standing criticism that the company is too hands-off when it comes to policing misinformation and falsehoods from world leaders.
The move, which escalates tensions between Washington and Silicon Valley in an election year, was made in response to two Trump tweets over the past 24 hours. The tweets falsely claimed that mail-in ballots are fraudulent. Twitter’s label says, “Get the facts about mail-in ballots,” and redirects users to news articles about Trump’s unsubstantiated claim.
The tweets, said Twitter spokeswoman Katie Rosborough, “contain potentially misleading information about voting processes and have been labeled to provide additional context around mail-in ballots.”
The label directs users to articles by CNN, The Washington Post and the Hill, along with selections from the articles and a page summarizing the findings of fact-checkers.
Twitter’s action quickly drew backlash from Trump and his supporters. Twitter “is now interfering in the 2020 Presidential Election,” the president tweeted. “They are saying my statement on Mail-In Ballots, which will lead to massive corruption and fraud, is incorrect, based on fact-checking by Fake News CNN and the Amazon Washington Post.”
For its 14-year existence, Twitter has allowed misinformation by world leaders and everyday citizens to spread virtually unchecked. Its leaders have long said users would engage in debate on the platform and correct false information on their own.
But Trump has made many false claims on social media, particularly on his preferred medium of Twitter, and has also attacked people in ways that critics have argued could violate company policies on harassment and bullying.
For example, Twitter faced a barrage of criticism earlier Tuesday over another set of Trump tweets. The widower of a former staffer to then-Rep. Joe Scarborough asked Twitter chief executive Jack Dorsey to delete tweets by Trump furthering a baseless conspiracy theory about the staffer’s wife’s death. Those tweets are still up, a reflection of social media companies’ approach to policing content that can appear inconsistent even as they have stepped up their enforcement.
Twitter is debating whether to take action on the Scarborough tweets, said a person familiar with the discussions who spoke on the condition of anonymity because he was not authorized to speak publicly.
Widower of Joe Scarborough staffer seeks removal of Trump tweets that promote baseless conspiracy theory
Its much larger rival Facebook, by contrast, launched a fact-checking program several years ago. Facebook funds an army of third-party fact-checkers to investigate content, which then gets labeled on the site and demoted in its reach. However, Trump posted the same content about mail-in ballots on Facebook.
Facebook said it didn’t plan to label or remove the post. “We believe that people should be able to have a robust debate about the electoral process, which is why we have crafted our policies to focus on misrepresentations that would interfere with the vote,” Facebook spokesperson Andy Stone said.
Twitter, which has roughly 330 million users compared to Facebook’s 2.6 billion, has not had the resources or the institutional will to engage fact-checkers.
But Twitter has changed its approach during the pandemic. In March, the company revised its terms of service to say it would remove posts by anyone, even world leaders, if such posts went “against guidance from authoritative sources of global and public health information.” That includes comments claiming social distancing is ineffective or essential oils can be used to cure the disease, for example.
Soon after, for the first time, Twitter applied the policy to world leaders, removing tweets by Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro and Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro, arguing that the tweets about breaking social distancing orders and touting false cures had such potential for harm that labeling them would be insufficient.
In March, Twitter labeled a manipulated video of presumptive Democratic nominee Joe Biden that was retweeted by Trump. That same month, Facebook took down a misleading ad about the U.S. census, one of two times that Facebook has taken action against the Trump campaign.
Then earlier this month, Twitter rolled out a policy saying that it would label or provide warning messages about corona virus related misinformation, even when that information is not a direct contradiction of health authorities and does not violate the company’s policies. The company said at the time that it may expand the labels risk of harm. Tuesday’s tweets on elections represent an expansion into a new area of election-related misinformation.
“It’s clear that social networking sites have a critical role to play in disseminating democratic speech and therefore in helping to police the boundaries of that speech," said Joshua Pasek, an associate professor of communication and media at the University of Michigan. "The fact that Twitter felt the need to take this action suggests that there is a point at which the preservation of democracy in their view overshadows the importance of remaining non-partisan.”
As a matter of policy, Twitter and other tech companies hold world leaders to different standards than everyday users. The content of world leaders is kept up by Facebook, Twitter and Google’s YouTube, even when it violates company policies, a practice known as the “newsworthiness exemption.”
That policy has long been subject to criticism because comments by world leaders can have massive impacts on people’s behavior and the potential to cause harm. Trump’s recent promotion of the drug hydroxychloroquine as an experimental treatment for the novel coronavirus, for example, caused prescriptions and sales to soar.
If Trump had instructed people to take the drug outright, the statement would probably have been taken down by both Facebook and Twitter, according to people who work there who spoke on the condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly. Instead the president walked a fine line, promoting the benefits of the drug and saying he was taking it himself.
The World Health Organization has halted studies of the drug out of concern that it causes more harm than good.
"Twitter slaps fact-checking label on Trump tweets" - it should be the norm for all of this compulsive liar's tweets. What a shame to a great nation like the USA to have such an unscrupulous liar as President!!
Particularly right after eight years of an intelligent, accomplished gentleman, and racial minority, president. Wall Street itself has wanted nothing to do with Trump for years, except for a single bank that he's defaulted on more than once.
He's not only a liar, he's evil. I call it evil when he fires inspectors general for doing their job--keeping 78 government departments honest--and hollows out the Environmental Protection Agency while deliberately promoting air pollution. I could go on for several book lengths. Just remember the title of James Clapper's book: "Everything Trump Touches Dies." A truer word was never spoken.
The Democrats need to be very careful with what they wish for with mail in voting - the fact that Trump is making a big song and dance about how it can be abused possibly suggests, given his track record, that he and the Republicans are already planning to misuse and abuse it as part of the re-election campaign.
Post a Comment
People who like this
New Topic
You should check in on some of those fields below.
Title
Category
Comment
Confirmation
Click Confirm to delete this Forum Thread and all the associated comments.
This book is the result of the author's many years of experience and observation throughout his 26 years in the stockbroking industry. It was written for general public to learn to invest based on facts and not on fantasies or hearsay....
redredredred
916 posts
Posted by redredredred > 2020-05-26 21:28 | Report Abuse
2.33 x 4 = 9.32 sekian terima kasih