Maybe im the only person that thinks Hapseng fundamental is not as good as many people though, I bought it around June 2013 and dispose all of it around mid this year. FY2014 profit hit record high mainly due to fair value gain, strip off that, core profit would have fallen by close to 40-50% of FY2013 level. Also the increase risk concentration of relying on property sector to support the group's earning. Hapseng is relatively new to property development, but property division already contribute almost 60%+ of earnings. Other division such as Automobiles selling Mercedes, fertilizer, quarry are either flat or down in 2014, exception being plantation, but from the long term, it seems like property is the only division that can support this growth. I am not denying who knows they can do really well in property, but the risk is crystal clear.
FA include biscuit balance between crunchiness and chewiness; aftertaste; cholesterol & sugar level; biscuit per fullness (the more a person can consume without feeling full, the better) etc
think so true they said majority will lost in share market. the minority are those sharks and value investor+some 'luck'? myself also switch to property investment instead mostly. left a little bit for unit trust. little bit, one counter for stock for now.
Hm since u say im so naive to believe, that means u dont have evidence to proof it is the management and CEO that dump the shares that caused the drop today? or the speculators? Or maybe everytime the share drop you will come and laugh at me ?
Posted by ks55 > Dec 30, 2014 05:34 PM | Report Abuse kcchongnz -- You didn't come across, that doesn't mean none. With a little bit of luck, I dare to tell you, there are people with that type of calibre.
"I would like you to imagine a national coin-flipping contest. Let's assume we get 225 million Americans up tomorrow morning and we ask them all to wager a dollar. They go out in the morning at sunrise, and they all call the flip of a coin. If they call correctly, they win a dollar from those who called wrong. Each day the losers drop out, and on the subsequent day the stakes build as all previous winnings are put on the line. After ten flips on ten mornings, there will be approximately 220,000 people in the United States who have correctly called ten flips in a row. They each will have won a little over $1,000.
Now this group will probably start getting a little puffed up about this, human nature being what it is. They may try to be modest, but at cocktail parties they will occasionally admit to attractive members of the opposite sex what their technique is, and what marvelous insights they bring to the field of flipping.
Assuming that the winners are getting the appropriate rewards from the losers, in another ten days we will have 215 people who have successfully called their coin flips 20 times in a row and who, by this exercise, each have turned one dollar into a little over $1 million. $225 million would have been lost, $225 million would have been won.
By then, this group will really lose their heads. They will probably write books on "How I turned a Dollar into a Million in Twenty Days Working Thirty Seconds a Morning." Worse yet, they'll probably start jetting around the country attending seminars on efficient coin-flipping and tackling skeptical professors with, " If it can't be done, why are there 215 of us?"
cukupla kcchongnz lu sendiri tak mau join.kata ni game tak penting tapi cakap banyak sekarang.tengok lu punya stock analysis cenbond, padini,kuchai sudah tau lu koyak.
jgn kata market tak bagus.adakah growthinvestor,ooi teik bee,hjey,skyland tau market koyak dari oktober?top 4 ini ialah stockpicker terbaik di i3.mereka yg patut cakap sekarang.
kc tu saja nak kecoh. semua stock dia koyak habis pun. pandai pulak nak cover line kecoh dengan cakap kosong dia tu. diangkat pulak ks55 konon pakar saham, dahlah ks55 ni batang hidung kembang kena pujian kosong
Bukan main lagi puji ks, macam dumb and dumber jerr pasangan sumbang ni. ks tu beli saham yang nak delist pun, London Biscuit tu bukan dah basi ke? Dah tu kejar SKPetro masa harga minyak menjunam. Lepas tu tambah gelak lagi, dibeli or harga 14 sen sedangkan hari ni pun 9 sen boleh beli senang lenang. Pasangan dumb and dumber katakan
Posted by milopanas > Dec 30, 2014 07:42 PM | Report Abuse
cukupla kcchongnz lu sendiri tak mau join.kata ni game tak penting tapi cakap banyak sekarang.tengok lu punya stock analysis cenbond, padini,kuchai sudah tau lu koyak.
jgn kata market tak bagus.adakah growthinvestor,ooi teik bee,hjey,skyland tau market koyak dari oktober?top 4 ini ialah stockpicker terbaik di i3.mereka yg patut cakap sekarang.
What is a cynic? A man who knows the price of everything and the value of nothing. OscarvWilde
I assisted a philanthropist who made multimillion investing in the stock market and he gave out a lot to charity, helping the needy people to universities, and contributing to social activities. We are not talking about RM5m or RM10m, but may be RM100m. Yet he seldom talked much about it.
I have so many friends, classmates whose children have graduated from overseas becoming doctors, dentists, engineers, accountants, successful chefs and great home makers. Many of my friends and classmates also have a lot of money from their career, business as well as from the stock market, yes , many from the stock market, and yet they never talked about their wealth etc.
But I doubt anyone cares about all these, about how rich one is. so lets concentrate on discussion and sharing about investment in i3investor.
Lets talk about your London biscuits since you peddled it so much in another thread as it seem someone named milopanas is not happy about us discussion about the fundamentals of stocks and investing here, or he seems only think that whatever his comments, all over the place, are much valuable than anyone else. Let us go here:
Mr Tan, if not too much trouble to you, May i suggest you also do a quarter review and sum up at the end of one year for one whole year review. Thank you.
Posted by ttb88 > Dec 31, 2014 06:32 PM | Report Abuse
Dear Tan KW, Where is kcchong, why not in the list?
Sorry I am a little wary about new id in i3investor and that was why I did not response to your questions. But since you are quite persistent in asking about me, here it is.
Noby, you can see what was the motive of this new id ttb88 in i3investor asking about my pick in 2014. Was it because he really interested in my sharing of stock investing? Read for yourself:
Posted by ttb88 > Dec 30, 2014 07:16 PM | Report Abuse “So Kcchong, mind to share example of share that u bought recently during the downturn? Thanks.” The above question was asked twice, exactly the same words, the first one deleted and asked again to make sure I saw it. But again I ignored it. See the “tone” of the question? As I ignored him, he asked again, to Tan KW now.
Posted by ttb88 > Dec 31, 2014 06:32 PM | Report Abuse “Dear Tan KW, Where is kcchong, why not in the list?” See his “eagerness” of knowing why was I not in the list? I was then clear of his motive of asking, crystal clear. That was why I posted this comment here:
“Posted by kcchongnz > Dec 31, 2014 07:25 PM | Report Abuse X Sorry I am a little wary about new id in i3investor and that was why I did not response to your questions. But since you are quite persistent in asking about me, here it is.
Well, this was supposed to be my pick here which Tan KW did not accept it. Read this in the thread
"I would take this as my only stock for the challenge going on now."
after all the ex-dates for 5 for 1 split, its 1 for 1 bonus, dividends etc, at today's price of RM1.44, the total return so far is 275%!”
Tan KW did confirm that. So this guy asked the wrong question to the wrong person. He should know very well that Tan KW is my friend. Or he just wanted to kachau Tan KW also.
“Posted by Tan KW > Dec 31, 2014 10:47 PM | Report Abuse @kcchongnz, i might miss your pick for 2014. please accept my apology.”
Was I trying to boast? You would understand that I am not that kind of person. This guy just wanted to see what my failure in stocks would be in 2014, if any, then rejoices and “sings” endlessly in i3investor to prove his point? This guy has been trying to do that all the time, each time with a different id, but failed miserably because he just can’t understand anything finance to be able to find mistakes in my numerous posts in i3investor, which I believe there are many.
Well I did have a few stocks in my sharing which did quite badly last year which I will address them soon. If one has written about scores of stocks for the past year, I would unseat all the giants of investing; Warren Buffett, Charles Munger, Joel Greenblatt, Walter Schloss, Peter Lynch etc if I do not have any stock which has gone down in prices in the volatile market last year. In fact I have a number of stocks which did badly.
To curb his “happiness” about it, or "幸灾乐祸”, for now I will just tell him that the overall performance of those stocks I wrote about within the past one year, did reasonably ok though the performance is far below those top 5 in the “2014 contest”. And you do know value investing horizon is not a year or two, but a long-term endeavour. Read below you will know what I mean about this guy ttb88.
“Posted by ttb88 > Jan 1, 2015 12:20 AM | Report Abuse OTB, Kcchong and CPteh, tis 3 fellow keep promoting to join their courses but not even dare to join this friendly game.........where are them???”
What has it got to do with him when people make some earnings for the effort they put in? Anyway, thank him for promoting my online value investing course. I have gone through 4 courses now. Some participants did drop out because either value investing is not right for them (which I have explained in details before they joined), or they couldn’t commit their time to do it along the way. But to curb his mindset of "幸灾乐祸”, I would tell him most are very happy about the course, and if I would to put the positive comments written by them here, it would occupy many pages.
I extend my congratulations to top 4 whom beat the market by a wide margin. I presume those dispute the result fail to understand one of the most profound investing principles.
The is no such thing as a fool-proof stockpicking strategy. The effectiveness and efficiency of strategy depends on execution part by an investor. Two investors with exact same portfolio at opening could end up with different rate of return.
Luck is what happens when preparation meet opportunity.
There were about half a million readerships already. Any posting in a public forum like this subject to various scrutinies and criticisms, whether constructive or malicious.
So why you said I "no ball"? What have you contributed to i3investor? How come you got more balls than me?
Something is not right about you. Go see a doctor.
This book is the result of the author's many years of experience and observation throughout his 26 years in the stockbroking industry. It was written for general public to learn to invest based on facts and not on fantasies or hearsay....
JT Yeo
1,637 posts
Posted by JT Yeo > 2014-12-30 17:45 | Report Abuse
Maybe im the only person that thinks Hapseng fundamental is not as good as many people though, I bought it around June 2013 and dispose all of it around mid this year. FY2014 profit hit record high mainly due to fair value gain, strip off that, core profit would have fallen by close to 40-50% of FY2013 level. Also the increase risk concentration of relying on property sector to support the group's earning. Hapseng is relatively new to property development, but property division already contribute almost 60%+ of earnings. Other division such as Automobiles selling Mercedes, fertilizer, quarry are either flat or down in 2014, exception being plantation, but from the long term, it seems like property is the only division that can support this growth. I am not denying who knows they can do really well in property, but the risk is crystal clear.