This is the lunacy of PE10. Everyone knows that the market doesn't yield to anyone just because millions of people use a PE 10 to set TP. A stock like CCB has inconsistent ROE and profit growth, those are the 2 most important things that change PE multiple.
I will offer you a better way to come to your TP. Look across the ROE since 2006. 2% - 19%, a strong volatility across one decade. And think for yourself, does a car distributor has competitive advantage? or does a car manufacturer has an edge over others? Using 10% as cost of capital, by the way CCB has failed to achieve ROE of above 10% for past 2-3 years; you would be conservative to assign a long term 12% ROE; and aggressive to assisng 15% long term ROE.
So CCB has NTA sitting at $2.58. 12% ROE implies a TP of $3.10 (2.58 x 1.2); while 15% implies TP of $3.87 (2.58 x 1.5). And you have not apply margin of safety of 30-50%. Once you have apply your buy price should be at $1.50 - $2.70. This is way more 'accurate' than using PE 10
There are more than hundred of methods of calculating a target price, ask a merchant banker who has experience in assisting clients to do IPO. All prices set are very subjective & prices set can always be justified & supported using all kinds of assumptions.
In setting a price target, some use the most commonly acceptable method, PE, like what I did. Some apply discounted cash flow method. In your case, ROE.
In CCB situation, we can keep on arguing this or that, but the fact were CCB were not doing well 2-3 years back, other than that, things have changed following the launch of new models from AG Daimler. With now ROE of 20% for 2015, what can we expect?
No, all TPs are nothing if Mr Market does not buy the idea. If you think Mr Market has underestimated the value of CCB, then it is chance for you to buy.
If you think Mr Market has done right & you are agreeable to it, then look for other better investment opportunity.
As long as you have your own calculation & judgement based on whatever valid sources, then you are on your way to be successfully in investing.
To me, CCB is having simple business model which I can understand, like Gadang, so I will stick to it until the time MB are no longer selling good.
You are right, so everyone needs to start using more tools other than PE to make judgement. The more tools you have the better you can improve your accuracy. You need to understand the true meaning behind PE multiple.
As i said again the only issue with PE multiple is this - Normally when do people start assign an PE and TP? When the EPS or Q result go up obviously. You don't see people apply a PE and TP after profit falls, they just sell it.
So you have a situation where you are applying a PE multiple on an inflated earnings, the end result you get is a TP that is so aggressive and one that leave you no room for error. And again looking across the historical ROE of CCB, average is close to 10-12%, you won't want to think that 20% is a new era, unless you can find an evident that they do something different. I am sure since 2006, Mercedes has introduced a lot of great models, but doesnt make their ROE sustainable at such high level.
Doing business is an Art plus rational acts rather than pure science.
I don't like to set very complicated calculation to arrive my expected PE or TP, because digging too deep or details will lose the initial focus.
I don't agree on your statement on "the more tools we use the more accurate the result can be".
Life is always full of uncertainty, business also. I will not call it accuracy but call it confidence to achieve the desired goal, in this situation, investment goal.
When talk about inflated earnings, it is very arguable, since when we can't predict higher profits based on previous quarters' results? Or we should only project lower profit?
To be strict on it, we will be always wrong when we are estimating future profit.
In Gadang case, I was wrong because I am under-estimating the profit. In CCB case, I am wrong because I am over-estimating the profit. In anyway, I will be always wrong no matter what my estimation.
As reminder, KESM did deliver excellent result in the latest QR & price up nearly to RM6 within 1 day, now only about RM4.65, what a surprise to me.
No matter how simple or complicated on the calculation, know what are you doing & trust your judgement. Market is always unpredictable.
In my opinion, the most important things are the basis of arriving the conclusion, I trusted mine & I still trust. You have yours & I believe it is not wrong of using it, as long as you know it is the most suitable to you.
Never too optimistic, because you may be over confidence; Never too pessimistic, because you may miss the chance.
The allegation, made in a federal lawsuit filed this week in New Jersey against the German automaker, mirrors similar claims that have beset Volkswagen. It was brought by a Mercedes owner in Illinois, who claims the automaker uses the device in its BlueTec cars to turn off a system meant to reduce nitrogen oxide in its exhaust.
That is why I use ROE instead of estimating the profit. You can look at all the broker analysts, they have all the information they need and how many of them get their estimation right?
And since you are playing a long term game, it makes even more sense not to estimate profit but rather focus on the competitive advantage of the company. That means asking does CCB have any edge over his competitor? Why does a great competitor like Hapseng, their automotive arm that is also a Mercedes authorised dealership, had a flip flop earnings, sometimes red sometimes black and never seems to grow since 2009, will CCB do better than them etc..
I agree in keeping things simple, but that is not a privilege that I can afford to have, Im not sure about you. Investing is a skill. Just like anything from chess, golf to gymnastic and swimming. The way Michael Phelps swim like a dolphin; that's because he spend 10-15 hours in the pool everyday for 10-15 years. The way grandmaster can make a move in split second on the chess board, that is because they have been doing the drill everyday for 10 years; those gymnast, they trained until they body are so sore everyday to make it look so easy in the olympic, you get my point.
If you decide to keep it simple as in using purely PE, then you better be mindful and have a lot alot of margin of safety in your purchase price. Keep things simple is the best advice, but it can become an illusion to yourself too. Just be careful of that.
Always the case , when slight bad news came out , investors tend to react negatively and over exaggerated . If tomorrow if it happens to slip further , a chance to collect and make some profits through its tecnical rebound .
JT Yeo, actually, all else equal, I prefer to use PE over ROE. In my opinion, it is easier to assume that the company can maintain the profit, than to assume that the company can continue to be as efficient in utilising equity as it did in the past. But of course I don't depend on PE alone to make my investment decision, and I do take ROE into consideration. What I'm trying to say is, if I have only 1 tool to use to make decision, it is PE rather than ROE. Maintaining the profit is just doing more or less the same as it did last quarter, maintaining same efficiency means figuring out what to do with new equity. The former is an easier assumption, in my opinion.
in terms of COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE - CCB is actually a shareholder of Merz Benz. Look at the cash flow statement properly, the net cash inflows from operations is derived by inflating the Accounts Payable. A component of the AP is the interest free loan by Merz Benz. Hap Seng got none of this...Also - CCB is the preferred dealer for Merz Benz - whenever HapSeng runs short of stock, they will take it from CCB. Got it?
Also, from 2007 until 2014, the reason CCB is doing poorly is mainly due to the poor design.
Yea i get what you mean, it's just that when people assign PE to a TP, they normally do that when EPS is at the peak, without taking into account the historical EPS and reversion to mean, thinking that this time it is different etc. Of course, if people think like me, no one would buy Amazon, Facebook etc lol, but yea, it is all about being conservative.
JT Yeo, I start to doubt if you have read properly on my articles when you said the following:
"they normally do that when EPS is at the peak, without taking into account the historical EPS and reversion to mean"
I strongly suggest you to take a look at table 1 & 3 of my first article on CCB where more analysis were in fact done, of which include ROE that you have emphasized.
When we write an article, it is impossible to discuss every ratio analysis in one go, no one will read on it. It will be too technical. Ultimately, we need to select those commonly acceptable to the readers. If anyone has missed other section, that's bad.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- You have implied that some may have thought that this time is different or INI KALILAH.
In CCB, nothing is special or different, because they have already in business for decades.
We all have to read the market's behaviors in the past in relation to the past years figures on a particular stock. The business model is so predictable that everyone know how automotive industries work.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- One point I do agree with you, to me, I will hardly make up my mind to invest in Amazon, Facebook, Google, etc.
I am not trying to find excuses or reasoning my estimation, as whether right or wrong, no one is knowing who am I in real life, but I find it is worth to take time to reply to you, Yeo.
No matter how good we calculate, collective actions by other investors are more important, great result but price drop.
Business sense in investing are the decisive factor while ratios or figures analysis are merely tools or instruments to assist in making investing decision.
My point is that a grossly undervalued stock can still be sold off & incur losses for those late to the party because of heavy insider/informed trading & hordes of retailers coming in due to rumours.
I myself started buying in July '13 @ 2.62, when results were still declining,EPF was selling and only stopped buying in Feb '15, when the lowest price I got was 1.90,just as first uptick in quarterly results showed up.
Just as the overall market peaked in late Apr '15, I remember that 18,000 shares were done @ 2.05 on the day of the AGM on 23rd April.
JTYeo has a point - in that if you use the latest EPS which already hit all years high - then, the PE is likely to be inflated leaving little headroom for errors. But then, what if the high EPS becomes a new norm? then, P/E 7 at RM3.45 (my only entry price) is considered undervalued. I myself has no authority to dictate that the current EPS (for 2015) will be the same for 2016, but some dudes (Group CEO: Datuk Wong Kin Foo) at CCB think so.
Please refer to the article below: Cycle & Carriage expects a good year on Mercedes sales despite headwinds
GEORGE TOWN: Cycle & Carriage Bintang Bhd (CCBB) expects a good year ahead, despite the challenging economic environment.
Group chief executive officer Datuk Wong Kin Foo said there would be strong headwinds ahead, but the group had put in place new products and fresh business strategies to move forward.
“One of the new products coming in this year is the new E-Class, which will drive sales forward.
“Last year, Cycle & Carriage sold 11,000 units of Mercedes-Benz,” he said.
Wong spoke at the launch of the Cycle & Carriage newly upgraded showroom in George Town.
Cycle & Carriage also celebrated 130 years of the Mercedes-Benz brand innovation.
Wong said by mid-2016, CCBB would have its 12th Autohaus in the country at Cheras to serve the needs of customers in the southern part of Klang Valley.
“To ensure that all our customers continue to be treated equally, Cycle & Carriage will invest another RM30mil to upgrade six showrooms.
“We are committed to these investments to keep up with competitions and to ensure our customers are taken care of in the best possible manner,” Wong added.
Wong said CCBB spent RM4mil to renovate the showroom in George Town.
“The upgrading of this Autohaus took time because it is part of a heritage building protected by Unesco.
“We are unable to touch the facade too much and structurally have to maintain everything.
“The upgraded showroom has 33,489 sq ft of floor space to feature seven display vehicles, accommodate an upgraded customer lounge, and 14 mechanical work bays,” he said.
According to Wong, a total of RM20mil has been invested, which includes the latest RM4mil spent on the upgrading of the present showroom in George Town.
Technically a very strong closing by CCB today. It has weed out the sellers who r well absorbed. Need to go above rm3.50 to maintain long uptrend line. The market is bad so hope for the best now.
This book is the result of the author's many years of experience and observation throughout his 26 years in the stockbroking industry. It was written for general public to learn to invest based on facts and not on fantasies or hearsay....
projecti2016
789 posts
Posted by projecti2016 > 2016-02-22 22:53 | Report Abuse
lloydlim... u sure?