Care to explain the following statement from the report:
“Insas is undervalued as its net tangible asset per share stands at RM1.71,” “However, we think the stock is pricey as it is trading at a price earnings ratio of 14 times,”
Am confused....if insas is undervalue, so how can it be pricey? Value of insas and stock price have different meaning?????????? Hmmm...are they comparing intrinsic value of the stocks against the nta????
The statement from the edge is only based on the comment from one SJ Securities senior remisier. Anyway some of these remisiers talk cock. What is RM10 million grant to Inari for R&D? Peanuts. Fundamentally Insas is playing catching up to reflect its value.
You own a car. That's an asset. It's worth maybe 60k. Your job pays you 60k/year. Minus your yearly expenses (55k), Your yearly profit = 5k.
This is what Insas is like. If a girl wants to marry you, she will consider that you have a nice car (NTA) but your yearly expenses are extravagant (high P/E). Are you a good catch?
You can sell off your car, but that's a one off deal which only brings you profit for that single transaction. Your extra money at the end of the year isnt going to be enough to buy her the big house she's hoping for. Unless if you can prove that you're going to be making more money in the future, you've got no hope of marrying that sweet young thing.
It's all bullshit. YE 2013 EPS to date is 15.07 sen so it's ~8x and not 14. Looks like Edge used previous year ? NTA oso not up to date with recent asset valuation.
Agreed with gweilo.. The info given by the securities is incorrect. I am predicting there are some other undelying factors more than just the Inari's Mcap rise and R&D for the rise... some institutional buying perhaps (looking at the rather high volume)...the EDGE news is more of divertion on the true undelying reasons. I need more confirmation from the experienced guys.
Nagachan,the eps=RM200mln/700mln=28.57c if the growth remains the samei.e half year=101mln,1 year=RM101x2mln=202mln the PER=130c/28.57c=4.55times,nta=154+28.5=1.82c. This calculation is based on two factors:- 1)the increase in profit for 2th half is due growth and not extraordinary gain due to disposal asset/property 2)the growth is bcos of business expansion and the growth is constant to the 1st half of the year. The chart is uptrend and very bullish and if there is better dividend payment it will be even better.Buy!
Jackmoo, I am not so incline in properties counters at this moment. So I am not tempted. I have put money in Tadmax with landbanks which 1 MDB has bought. But my investment is trapped. Tadmax going south instead north like MH370
I follow this thread because I see some of you here are giving good analysis with good substance. People like Gweilo, Fam Jenny etc. Right or wrong is our own judgement.
Introducing MY's First IPO Fund for Sophisticated Investors!
MQ Chat
New Update. Discover investment communities that resonate with your ideas
MQ Trader
M & A Value Partners IPO Equity Fund has been launched - Targeted 13% Return p.a
Latest Videos
0:17
New IPO: Building management systems (BMS), solar thermal systems and energy-saving services provider, Solar District Cooling Bhd aims to list on the Ace Market!
This book is the result of the author's many years of experience and observation throughout his 26 years in the stockbroking industry. It was written for general public to learn to invest based on facts and not on fantasies or hearsay....
Fooksing Wong
1,138 posts
Posted by Fooksing Wong > 2014-03-31 12:41 | Report Abuse
http://www.theedgemalaysia.com/mobile/article.php?id=282694