Absolutely rubbish for Jaks to be zero value stocks.
due to Viet suffering from coal cancer which btw is 100% confirmed will happen.
Jaks members will pay new shareholders money to transfer shares to their names. By lifting the veil of incorporation [which all reasonable Judges will agree] all shareholders of Jaks will be personally liable for Viet cancers.
=> so nobody wants to be shareholders of Jaks due to cancer liability. => existing cancer promoters shareholders of Jaks will willingly and gratefully pay money to people willing to register as new cancer promoters shareholders of Jaks.
Conclusion Jaks is valued as a negative share where you get paid to be a cancer promoter shareholder. Absolutely rubbish for Jaks to be zero value stocks.
xiaoeh@@ sometimes it takes courage to cut loss, tho it may be painful! When I cut loss, it was like some1 pricked my ass with a needle! Felt a sharp pain!! However the pain didn’t last long!!!!!! As I recovered in other pasture!
So remember: Never Say “never die to hold!”! Always say ” there is another pasture to graze!” haha
Already warned months ago not to waste time on this counter. There are many more with better opportunities. For those that listened and believed, you saved a lot of heart sickening drama. For those that don't, just wish you all the best. No punt intended. Hope you are able to recover your loss in years to come. ✌️
Posted by Balian de Ibelin > 51 minutes ago | Report Abuse
Absolutely rubbish for Jaks to be zero value stocks.
due to Viet suffering from coal cancer which btw is 100% confirmed will happen.
Jaks members will pay new shareholders money to transfer shares to their names. By lifting the veil of incorporation [which all reasonable Judges will agree] all shareholders of Jaks will be personally liable for Viet cancers.
=> so nobody wants to be shareholders of Jaks due to cancer liability. => existing cancer promoters shareholders of Jaks will willingly and gratefully pay money to people willing to register as new cancer promoters shareholders of Jaks.
Conclusion Jaks is valued as a negative share where you get paid to be a cancer promoter shareholder. Absolutely rubbish for Jaks to be zero value stocks.
Everyone waiting here for you to show us the valuation you made TP 2.00 RM 2.00 you can us today`s data or 10 years ago data. Proof to us this share worth RM 2.00.
Don't drag to SAP. I told you clearly is my speculation counter.
Posted by Felix888999 > 52 seconds ago | Report Abuse Xiaoeh also want to learn how you came out with whopping 688% TP. Must have something normal people could not see. Everyone want to learn from you. Just share it.
wah lao Felix don't drag me in between ur fight with Mr Huang leh
i'a just a old and bald pity fatty wearing singlet with holes everywhere now sitting under the overhead bridge... please...
This book is the result of the author's many years of experience and observation throughout his 26 years in the stockbroking industry. It was written for general public to learn to invest based on facts and not on fantasies or hearsay....
Balian de Ibelin
14,951 posts
Posted by Balian de Ibelin > 2024-03-04 09:51 | Report Abuse
Absolutely rubbish for Jaks to be zero value stocks.
due to Viet suffering from coal cancer which btw is 100% confirmed will happen.
Jaks members will pay new shareholders money to transfer shares to their names.
By lifting the veil of incorporation [which all reasonable Judges will agree] all shareholders of Jaks will be personally liable for Viet cancers.
=> so nobody wants to be shareholders of Jaks due to cancer liability.
=> existing cancer promoters shareholders of Jaks will willingly and gratefully pay money to people willing to register as new cancer promoters shareholders of Jaks.
Conclusion
Jaks is valued as a negative share where you get paid to be a cancer promoter shareholder.
Absolutely rubbish for Jaks to be zero value stocks.
QED