Tambun has been doing very well, yes. If you are interested, you can read my opinion in one of the threads here.
Plenitude is a different story. It is not that aggressive in recent years and revenue and earnings growth is not good, but it really has huge amount of cash.
so which company is better to invest is a matter of personal choice. For me I am a conservative investor and I prefer to be safer. Plenitude, because of its high quality assets it has, is my preference.
When I talk about Plenitude assets, it is really very high quality; cash and investment in quoted shares, land bank which has not been revalued for ages etc.
These stuff alone after less off total liabilities, its value per share is still way above the market price now.
Agreed with both of you. I have invested in plenitude a couple of years and looking on his cash kept increasing at the current level of RM396mil, if exit this counter now, it was unfair to us. As a long term investor, we have the right to enjoy the huge cash. The major shareholders should do something on the cash.
plenitude's hotel started operation in Oct. the hotel name is four points by sheraton hotel. this is a four stars seaview hotel located in tanjung bungah, Penang with 220 rooms the rate starting from RM340. It is a sandy beach and modern style hotel. hope this will bring plenitude a excellent Q2 financial result (Oct-Dec 2013). you may go to the link : http://www.agoda.com/four-points-by-sheraton-penang/hotel/penang-my.html
for sure 6sen dividend is not impressive, but then i am still waiting how the management going to utilise the huge cash (rm396mil) in account. hopefully a special dividend will be declare.
david, you are right. recently land rich companies such as brem, shl and cview start boom up. may be is the turn for plenitude soon. plenitude has huge lank bank in tebrau (johor), puchong (selangor), batu ferringi (penang) and sungai petani (kedah). most of the lands bought in a very cheap price and all these lands never revalue for the past 10 years. remember... plenitude a cash up rm396mil (rm1.46/share). last year, plenitude sold a piece of land 3.53 acres in kuala lumpur with cash rm49.5mil (purchase in 2005 with rm3.9mil) with margin rm45.6mil.
Can you believe it ? A company market value at around 600 millions, but has 400 millions cash in hand, and has around 1,000 acre land......This is called Deeply undervalue property stock !
yes. david, that's why i kept plenitude for couple of years and never sell any single share. just wanna see how they are going to utilised this huge cash fund (rm1.46/share).
i am accumulate plenitude at rm2.65 today. plenitude got a lot of cheap landbank which was purchased more than 10 years ago. plenitude will become another brem soon.
Buying something for less than its value. The most dependable way to make money. Buying discount from intrinsic value and having asset price move towards its value doesn’t require serendipity; it just requires that market participants wake up to reality.
If your estimate of intrinsic value is correct, over time an asset’s price should converge with its value.
Trying to buy below value isn’t infallible, but it’s the best chance we have.
Howard marks: the most important thing illuminated.
Hi kcchongnz; I am new to this blog. The net-net valuation is appealing. However like many has commented they seem to have huge cash pile and good land bank. Wonder any news of project launch recently and any report you have come across on their revalued nta.
lepeng, are you dreaming? plenitude cash rm396mil, properties net book value stood over rm700mil and most of the properties bought 10 years ago. if revalue all these properties, the value will hit more than rm1bil. so the value of plenitude will be rm396 + rm1bil = rm1.396bil and nta will be around rm5.20.
aiyo, talking only, nowaday every property company just always has those kind of story of rich landbank. If it is really so valuable, why it is down? Do you think market really overlook it ? Don;t be dreaming lar, be more practical.
Down down down again, could down to RM2. Rich cash or rich landbank doesn't matter, what do matter is earning ability, without good earning result then don't expect on it will boom up. If company really think its company really undervalue, then why not share buy back?
you are right lepeng85, earning ability is important for the company. that's why some property companies who have rich landbank but low earning ability caused their share price do not move up. but not for plenitude. plenitude's previous quarter result Q1 net profit hits rm26.1mil, eps 9.7sen, do you think it doesn't have earning ability. its low cost landbank provide it's net earning margin more than 30%, almost the top among the property companies. plenitude going to launch more than rm700mil housing project this year and their hotel in penang was in operation since october last year.
so what I believe is its coming quarter report should be very bad, it profitability not consistency. Its management people might all old folks, all are waiting retired.
if you are thinking plenitude is not a good company, why you still want to buy in at below rm2.00? why not you set your target price below rm1.00 or even lower?
This book is the result of the author's many years of experience and observation throughout his 26 years in the stockbroking industry. It was written for general public to learn to invest based on facts and not on fantasies or hearsay....
kcchongnz
6,684 posts
Posted by kcchongnz > 2013-11-20 11:45 | Report Abuse
Tambun has been doing very well, yes. If you are interested, you can read my opinion in one of the threads here.
Plenitude is a different story. It is not that aggressive in recent years and revenue and earnings growth is not good, but it really has huge amount of cash.
so which company is better to invest is a matter of personal choice. For me I am a conservative investor and I prefer to be safer. Plenitude, because of its high quality assets it has, is my preference.