No way run and no way to hide,....Still have so many promotors dreaming can make millions....Those sharks of course will get millions ( already ran before suspension ) only bilis will pay for it..
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hoot9Yee Insider news : serbadk will suspend until 31st June 2022 23/11/2021 1:44 PM
Serba Dinamik in face-off with regulators Jose Barrock / The Edge Malaysia
November 23, 2021 14:00 pm +08 This article first appeared in The Edge Malaysia Weekly, on November 15, 2021 - November 21, 2021.
IS Serba Dinamik Holdings Bhd sliding down a slippery slope, or will the company’s management be vindicated, and some semblance of normalcy return to the beleaguered oil and gas outfit?
While the problems at the company first came to light in May, last week proved significantly challenging with consistent negative news flow, including that it was seeking legal redress against the frontline capital market regulator Bursa Malaysia Bhd. One market watcher says of the pickle the company is currently in: “Clearly, it would appear that Serba Dinamik has stuff to hide and is buying time.”
However, while an increasing number of people are sceptical of Serba Dinamik’s innocence, it has its fair share of sympathisers as well.
Last week, the company failed in its bid to obtain an interim injunction against Bursa Malaysia and Ernst & Young Consulting Sdn Bhd (EY) to prevent them from releasing a special independent review (SIR) on the findings on Serba Dinamik.
To recap, Serba Dinamik is seeking legal recourse against Bursa Malaysia, EY and its original auditors KPMG. The problems at the company began after KPMG in May flagged what it alleged were more than RM4.54 billion in questionable transactions.
Serba Dinamik executives have vehemently denied any wrongdoing, and have been trying to withhold the contents of EY’s findings, suggesting that the SIR is “preliminary and inconclusive”. The oil and gas company has also questioned Bursa Malaysia’s suspension of its stock.
Worst hit are likely to be the minority shareholders, who are powerless as the stock remains suspended. The company’s market capitalisation has plunged — from RM6 billion prior to the issues surfacing to RM1.3 billion, at its price of 35 sen per share when the suspension took place.
Minority Shareholders Watch Group (MSWG) CEO Devanesan Evanson said in a weekly newsletter last Friday, “As Serba Dinamik has taken legal action against Bursa Malaysia (and EY), the issue is now in the realm of the courts and MSWG awaits the timely resolution of the case in the interest of minority shareholders.”
Serba Dinamik did not reply to questions from The Edge for this article. Nevertheless, the pressure seems to be mounting on the company, which was once an investors’ darling in the oil and gas sector.
SC breaks its silence Last Thursday, Securities Commission Malaysia (SC) came out to explain that it had “conducted a raid on May 18, 2021, to secure documents and relevant evidence from several Serba Dinamik offices following a Section 320 Capital Markets and Services Act 2007 (CMSA) notice issued to the SC by KPMG”.
Section 320 of the CMSA says that if an auditor “is of the professional opinion that there has been a breach or non-performance of any requirement or provision of the securities laws, a breach of any of the rules of the stock exchange or any matter which may adversely affect to a material extent the financial position of the listed corporation, the auditor shall immediately submit a written report on the matter”.
Section 320(2) seems to provide auditors with immunity. It states that “No auditor shall be liable to be sued in any court for any report submitted by the auditor in good faith and in the intended performance of any duty imposed on the auditor”.
As such, Serba Dinamik’s case against KPMG could be an uphill task unless it manages to prove that the auditor did not act in good faith.
In the case of EY, which was brought in after KPMG flagged the issues, the SC says it had granted EY access to documents it had seized as the latter was having difficulties obtaining complete documentation from Serba Dinamik on several aspects of its review.
Meanwhile, Section 152 of the Securities Commission Malaysia Act 1993 (SCMA) allows the SC to require any person to disclose to it information it deems “expedient” for the administration of the securities laws. The SC, in an email response, says that it had issued a Section 152 SCMA notice to require EY to disclose its SIR findings for its review.
“The SC has made progress on its investigation and additional resources have been added to the team to ensure the investigation is completed in a timely manner,” the SC added.
Issues with Bursa and EY Serba Dinamik’s action against the local bourse is odd considering that Section 376 of the CMSA says that no civil liability shall be incurred by a stock exchange, where such act, statement or omission was done in good faith.
Bursa Malaysia had suspended trading in Serba Dinamik shares since Oct 22, after the oil
Posted by Honesty > Nov 22, 2021 9:04 PM | Report Abuse
Assumption to Accusation to Denial and the Repeat!! Everyday the same old story !! It is really a joke~~ Wonder why arent the nay sayers/critics get bored about their daily routine ?? Maybe they are just used to it, I mean they may be working 8-12hrs daily in a four walls set up!! Really pitiful~~
This book is the result of the author's many years of experience and observation throughout his 26 years in the stockbroking industry. It was written for general public to learn to invest based on facts and not on fantasies or hearsay....
muhfiq
759 posts
Posted by muhfiq > 2021-11-23 09:49 | Report Abuse
Now see their reaction
Usually have domino effect with the news
Or they can get away with other decoy