Posted by wahaha > 2014-01-27 17:24 | Report Abuse

Profit drop significantly...

http://www.theedgemalaysia.com/highlights/272806-highlight-msia-airports-4q-profit-falls-38-y-o-y-to-rm49m.html

Posted by lepeng85 > 2014-01-28 11:55 | Report Abuse

profit down, but share price still up?

Posted by GGmalaysia > 2014-01-29 00:51 | Report Abuse

sentimental value is strong in this share. high hopes on KLIA2

Posted by zack_liza > 2014-01-29 15:32 | Report Abuse

call buy now for airport...collect more at 8.60 and below...down like aircraft, up like rocket..buy..buy..buy..

Posted by zack_liza > 2014-01-30 10:08 | Report Abuse

no worry about airport...selling pressure from DRP portion....if throw i will collect more at good price...

Posted by jo888 > 2014-02-04 14:32 | Report Abuse

hi zack, what mean DRP portion?

Posted by davidkkw79 > 2014-02-05 19:39 | Report Abuse

delay still can up ah?!

Posted by zack_liza > 2014-02-05 23:29 | Report Abuse

drp (dividend reinvestment plan)..tomorrow will continue up to touch 8.50..minister confidence 2 may will be completed..better buy now..anytime 9.00 snd above.

Posted by wahaha > 2014-02-06 00:24 | Report Abuse

http://klse.i3investor.com/servlets/ptres/20911.jsp

Better watch and see further... looks like will drop further

Posted by VeryPoison > 2014-02-06 15:36 | Report Abuse

sky diving... too bad not enough bullet.... looks so tempting

Posted by Gusen > 2014-02-06 15:53 | Report Abuse

brought @ 7.90

Posted by wahaha > 2014-02-06 16:32 | Report Abuse

Think will drop further....let's see.... this stock is over goreng by EPF....

Posted by davidkkw79 > 2014-02-06 22:51 | Report Abuse

stupid company, unfinished delaying of KLIA2

Posted by arv18 > 2014-02-06 23:02 | Report Abuse

only EPF can/will reward such mismanagement. no one complains when the share price goes from 5.12 to 9.78.

Posted by lepeng85 > 2014-02-07 09:16 | Report Abuse

please down to rm 7

Posted by zack_liza > 2014-02-07 15:06 | Report Abuse

buy...buy...buy..RM7.00 jangan mimpi .....collect more....our company also collect more at this level...9.00 and above coming...this year can touch RM10.00 after breakout RM9.40...

Posted by buffetthe2nd > 2014-02-07 15:37 | Report Abuse

sell...after private placement...will drop more...klia2 wont be able to finish by may 2...must wait till september

Posted by zack_liza > 2014-02-07 18:06 | Report Abuse

wait & see.....whose will win...

Posted by is861001 > 2014-02-10 20:24 | Report Abuse

hahaha

Posted by zack_liza > 2014-02-12 16:23 | Report Abuse

if today closed 8.20 and above...tomorrow continue uptrend....buy..buy..buy..

Posted by cheeseburger > 2014-02-14 10:57 | Report Abuse

Let's see if Airasia will take action against MAHB or not...too many times of delay

Posted by zack_liza > 2014-02-19 16:21 | Report Abuse

wow...8.35..continue up trend to touch 8.70 ,9.00 and 9.30...still can buy ....

Posted by VeryPoison > 2014-02-19 17:32 | Report Abuse

Really up like rocket today...

Posted by thunderbird > 2014-02-21 10:44 | Report Abuse

still can buy ar?

Posted by VeryPoison > 2014-02-26 10:54 | Report Abuse

cannot

Posted by Gusen > 2014-02-28 10:46 | Report Abuse

time to buy now, MAHB akan dapat certificate of compliances hari ini

Posted by cpng > 2014-03-09 16:43 | Report Abuse

MAS flight incident .

Lousy security issues impact MAHB...beware

Posted by Tessa Joseph > 2014-03-14 11:52 | Report Abuse

PAC gives MAHB 2 weeks to submit report on KLIA2. KLIA2 to start Orat's last phase by month-end.

Posted by Joel > 2014-03-17 14:22 | Report Abuse

DUN BUY IN FIRST EVENTHOUGH IS DROPPING.
EXPECT WILL DROP MORE THIS COUNTER!

Posted by cheeseburger > 2014-03-20 13:25 | Report Abuse

was there a firm date on KLIA2? any CCC issued?

Posted by john1 > 2014-03-20 13:31 | Report Abuse

Don't buy this counter for the moment.

Posted by Joel > 2014-03-24 11:16 | Report Abuse

Got some1 buy Airport now ??
good price to enter.

Posted by loon427 > 2014-03-29 22:38 | Report Abuse

hi,now is good time to buy in??bc the price are low now!!

Posted by davidkkw79 > 2014-03-31 11:40 | Report Abuse

wait until rm7 first

Posted by FundSG123 > 2014-03-31 17:02 |

Post removed.Why?

Posted by TanSriDato > 2014-04-01 12:19 | Report Abuse

Malaysia Airports Holdings Bhd (MAHB) managing director Tan Sri Bashir Ahmad Abdul Majid should be sacked for incompetence and gross mismanagement over the construction of klia2, a DAP lawmaker said today.

Party national publicity chief Tony Pua said Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak should send a clear message to all government-linked companies (GLCs) that he would not tolerate incompetence and gross mismanagement.

Najib no longer had any excuse not to act against the top management of MAHB, Pua said in a statement.

Posted by cmkhairu > 2014-04-01 16:04 | Report Abuse

epf is hunting for this counter now...

Posted by ganneeneh > 2014-04-01 23:41 | Report Abuse

The new low-cost carrier terminal klia2, the opening of which was delayed several times, will finally be opened in May with only two airlines - Cebu Pacific and Malindo Air - operating there initially, Public Accounts Committee chairman Datuk Nur Jazlan Mohamed said today.

He added that AirAsia will move in later, after the system is up and running and klia2 is shown to be able to operate with a lower number of passengers in the initial stages.

Posted by keithchan > 2014-04-08 09:52 | Report Abuse

Malaysia Airports Holdings Bhd (MAHB), stop blaming others before you take stock of yourself first.

MAHB cannot be any better than Malaysia Airlines (MAS), but maybe worse. Where is your staff of calibre to check and balance AirAsia's 'demands' for upscaling?

Why only now blame AirAsia when you could have controlled it at the earlier stage? Didn’t you ask AirAsia for justification for any upscaling? Can't MAHB do its own analysis/research on what is the appropriate scale for KLIA2?

Posted by keithchan > 2014-04-08 09:55 | Report Abuse

MAHB's claim that AirAsia was the main reason for the cost/time overruns is absurd and only exposes MAHB's weakness in its management. How can a public-listed company with control on the project, lay the blame elsewhere for its own failure?

This is tantamount to gross negligence on its part but it now chooses to shift the blame. Any school kid can tell who is responsible for the mess and we don't need Public Accounts Committee’s (PAC) views on the matter.

Posted by ganneeneh > 2014-04-08 09:57 | Report Abuse

Actually, this is a simple issue. All that is required is for MAHB together with the Umno-BN government to instruct MNRB (which runs Malaysian Reinsurance Berhad), and Bank Negara Malaysia to issue a blanket insurance policy to AirAsia.

This is to guarantee AirAsia that MAHB and the government shall be responsible for all losses arising from damage to aircraft, loss of use, bodily injuries to staff, passengers, including loss of profits arising from flight delays, takeoffs, delivery of ground services, etc.

Then AirAsia's fears are gone, right? MAHB maintains its stand that airport, runways, etc, are all 101 percent real world standards, not Malaysia Umno/MCA cronies standards. Issue solved.

Posted by naughtygirl > 2014-04-08 09:57 | Report Abuse

You build it; you are responsible for the scope and the cost and of course the schedule. AirAsia can ask for the sky, yet you agree. Now you overrun your costs, go beyond your schedule and under deliver in terms of quality, you blame AirAsia.

What sort of project management is this? AirAsia is only a major tenant, not the owner.

Posted by naughtygirl > 2014-04-08 09:58 | Report Abuse

The builder is blaming the customer for his cost overruns. This is so comical. Please tell Malaysia who has ownership of this project?

Posted by saltedfish > 2014-04-08 09:59 | Report Abuse

Is there a safety issue here? In the haste to meet the much delayed opening deadline, are we putting aircraft and passenger safety on the line? The premier says he is looking into it. I hope there will be no compromise on safety.

Posted by cindylim > 2014-04-08 10:00 | Report Abuse

Don't tell me that before you start your project, you do not make a proper study with suggestions taken from various concerned parties and come out with a master plan. This is not like changing clothes.

Posted by candygirls > 2014-04-08 10:01 | Report Abuse

The ruling elites are saints who can do no wrong; any mistake is caused by others. No wonder the rakyat have to pay more and more for everything.

Posted by candygirls > 2014-04-08 10:03 | Report Abuse

Budgeted at RM1.6 billion, cost overruns to RM5 billion, and then blame AirAsia for building an airport that can handle the Airbus A380. A budget Airbus A380?

PAC chairperson Nur Jazlan Mohamed must be really dense to say that the tenants wanted a luxury airport and airplanes

Posted by ChanKengChungKuantan > 2014-04-08 10:03 | Report Abuse

Of course in Bolehland, the landlord doubles the size and quadruples the cost based on what the tenant wants and then blames the tenant for asking for the sky.

Aren't you supposed to negotiate and agree beforehand on these things? You are not building a Lego toy, for crying out loud.

Posted by naughtygirl > 2014-04-08 10:12 | Report Abuse

I am no apologist, nor spokesperson for AirAsia. But I never read any comments from AirAsia saying that the cracks on the runway cannot be rectified.

So, Nur Jazlan, do get your facts right. What is of concern seems to be that the repairs will be a recurrent nightmare.

Just look at the Bayan Lepas airport now, after so many millions spent, the driveway to the arrival hall gets flooded after a heavy downpour.

Yes, AirAsia is right to put its foot down - get the work right the first time rather than have the cracks as a recurrent nightmare.

It’s wonderful to blame AirAsia for the size of KLIA2 now. But who calls the shots - MAHB or AirAsia?

Posted by FatFLOM > 2014-04-08 10:14 | Report Abuse

“Can be rectified?” So it is not done yet? It looks like AirAsia's concerns were justified then. You think patch-up jobs will solve the problems overnight?

And while their requests may have contributed to higher cost, this is long-term planning, like the baggage carousel. It is MAHB which insisted on using aerobridges and the Sita (airport management) system.

So really, who is the one that is increasing the costs and for whose benefit?