KLSE (MYR): GAMUDA (5398)
You're accessing 15 mins delay data. Turn on live stream now to enjoy real-time data!
Last Price
8.90
Today's Change
-0.13 (1.44%)
Day's Change
8.89 - 9.09
Trading Volume
6,341,400
2024-11-29
2024-11-29
2024-11-29
2024-11-29
2024-11-29
2024-11-29
2024-11-28
2024-11-28
2024-11-28
2024-11-28
2024-11-27
2024-11-27
2024-11-27
2024-11-27
2024-11-27
2024-11-26
2024-11-26
2024-11-26
2024-11-25
2024-11-25
2024-11-25
2024-11-23
2024-11-22
2024-11-22
2024-11-22
2024-11-22
2024-11-21
2024-11-21
2024-11-21
2024-11-20
2024-11-20
2024-11-20
2024-11-20
2024-11-19
2024-11-19
2024-11-19
2024-11-19
Buns
165 posts
Posted by Buns > 2018-10-10 11:27 | Report Abuse
TLDR for you one liners.
I'm not a Gamuda supporter. This is a necessary disclaimer since most i3investor forumers can't understand how a person would take a neutral unbiased view without any money on the stock. Just reviewing facts and figures.
Trade secrets are a form of intelletual property. Unlike patents which may expire over a certain period, trade secrets are often perpetual in nature.
A very simple example of a trade secret is the recipe to coke.They company protects their recipe by shipping ingredients anonymously and factory managers are told the relative proportions but not ingredients.
It even has it's own wikipedia page : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coca-Cola_formula
I'm not comparing Gamuda to coke of course. But I'm saying trade secrets are important. It is not just shared to the government but an engineering firm as well.
I rooted for Tony but he did leave some blanks unasnwered. And yes, I have read the ENTIRE exchange between Gamuda and Tony.
i ) If Tony believed the savings would be worth 4.19 to 5.79 billion-why wasn't this sum given to Gamuda? The market is buyer and seller right?
If I go to wet market and ask price of T shirt. Aunty wants to give for 15 , I say no too much, she asks for my price-I say no thanks and walk away. Why didn't I give my figure of 10? That's what negotiation is about.
I find it hard to believe that Gamuda would walk away from just an addition 3 b in reduction-remember, they reduced is by 2.3 billion already- then have no deal at all.
UNLESS......
a) MoF did not tell them the figure they had in thier mind. Which was what Gamuda implied. No figure how to know what price you want brother?
b) The figure was grossly depressed
ii) Which brings me to b). Yes, the independent firm is not any Tom Dick company hired by MoF, but Gamuda did ask for second consultation. Why didn't they get it?
Just like if you got cyst. You don't go one doctor to check if benign or not. You go to at least 3-4.
Gamuda said the first consulting firm made the value too simplified. They requested for another consultation just like another doctor. Why weren't they given the benefit of the doubt?
That's all I want to hear.