Thin vs. Thick Edge: Which Is Better? The short answer: It depends. An enterprise’s use-case and software capabilities are the primary factors in determining which edge hardware best suits its needs. According to MachNation research of enterprise IoT buyers, roughly 90 percent of the complexity at the edge is software-related. Thus, while many hardware vendors already provide hardware that adequately supports most IoT solutions, the quality, sophistication, usability, and scalability of vendors’ software and platform for both thin and thick edge deployments remain a differentiator. While having the right software to suit enterprise needs is critical, choosing the right edge hardware can often be the key differentiator between an overly-complex, costly edge deployment and an effective one.
Thin Edge Hardware & Use Cases A thin edge is an IoT solution that supports and manages decentralized deployments of low-powered, memory and power constrained devices. Some examples include Arm Cortex-M devices, low-power Texas Instruments (TI) devices, Marvell Technology devices, and others.
These devices transmit data northbound with minimal execution of workloads (e.g., filtering, aggregation, or normalization) or with analytics being performed at the site of data origin. Enterprises install thin edge nodes to connect legacy equipment to their cloud solutions, taking advantage of cost savings on equipment.
Use Cases: Track and trace; battery-powered sensors, continuous transmission of small geo-data packets to the cloud. Agricultural monitoring; low-powered, transmitting selective low-volume data points to a gateway device. Smart building; battery-powered sensors that only “wake up” when an action is triggered or when transmitting low-volume data to the centralized monitoring and management platform. Thick Edge Hardware A thick edge is an IoT solution that supports and manages high-powered, high-capability edge hardware. Some examples include high-powered IoT gateway devices from companies like Dell and Cisco, Arm Cortex-A devices, x.86-based devices, and others. These devices can run advanced on-device inference, event processing rules, business logic, analytics, and machine learning algorithms.
On an adjusted basis, the valuation of ARB is still on the low side, where this main market software company is trading at a mere 1.73 times PER.
I believe this is caused by
i). Lack of understanding on the core business, ii). Hard-to-understand financial reports and iii). Fear of dilution from ICPS. Nevertheless, these problems are time-adjusted and they would solve automatically in the future.
Hence, I would like to personally issue a strong buy call on ARB by pegging a 5 times PER on the adjusted TTM EPS of the company of 18.58, which would translate to a share price of RM0.930~, representing a 87.08% margin of safety on the current price.
EastWestTalker the analysis was good. But the public wants to see the products. Without understanding the business, Warren Buffett said it’s risky. The target price of 0.25 won’t b possible if the management keeps on hiding the products n the track record.
The drop in arbb stocks was not due to the sentiment. it was due to lack of confidence when they keep on asking more n more money. MOU with local uni we never heard anything. N suddenly the boss talking of Nasdaq
for sure everyone can buy it from low but i do agree also what said above, now market so bad. (Will it get lower or not ) marketing is going bad due to inflation
Hehehe… the public knows…. The price arbb has been dropping all the time. Do u think the public won’t check how the counter dropped from 50 cents to 11 cents. Most likely 5 cents soon
hehehe... limit up...from 50 cents drop to 12 cents....and no products.... none of the keyboard warriors here including DannyArcher, Neonstrife, EastWestTalker was able to show the product page of this counter. U need to understand the business first according to Warren Buffet.
The public is watching bro...they are no more naive. They know... no product page... and everything looking fishy bro.... never fulfill even one requirement related to nasdaq, but talking about nasdaq...mou with local universities....but don't know what happened.
last time...even the keyboard warriors were calling the boss names....especially when the shares were dropping......i can't imagine how the boss's family feels....
Plus even the public wants to see how different is ARBB's hydroponic product compared to the DIY IoT stuff....The public knows about all these....Yes...................the keyboard warriors try to use jargons like RFSC. BUt it won't work...u need to understand the products first...
I m just afraid about the public getting angry with the jargons...and the boss talking irrelevant stuff....the public is powerful...they might strip the boss ... and parade him around his office.....dont play......The public can get angry bro
Just imagine loose 80% of money .. and here comes the boss talking about nasdaq etc ... sure wrong move right .. what do u think keyboard warrior neonstrife
isn't it dangerous to talk nonsense at this moment of time when everyone is struggling.... why not the keyboard warriors advice the management...be transparent..show the products properly....demo them .......so that the public could fairly evaluate...if u never do this...those who loose 80% might get angry... getting stripped naked and paraded....is not what the boss wants....because for some going to jail is better esp after loosing 80%
Jokuprg it’s not tech stocks … it’s arbb…. The public is angry…..n watching like a big fierce tiger… n this Mickey Mouse management is playing the fool…. Irritating them…. Again and again I’m advising …. Please don’t !!!! Safety….first…
老万股...if real good growing stock...insider already push long time ago...no need to wait for public....poor stock..Owner not enough fund to push!!! Line is correct!.. money to
This book is the result of the author's many years of experience and observation throughout his 26 years in the stockbroking industry. It was written for general public to learn to invest based on facts and not on fantasies or hearsay....
neonstrife
465 posts
Posted by neonstrife > 2022-06-01 10:16 | Report Abuse
Thin vs. Thick Edge: Which Is Better?
The short answer: It depends. An enterprise’s use-case and software capabilities are the primary factors in determining which edge hardware best suits its needs. According to MachNation research of enterprise IoT buyers, roughly 90 percent of the complexity at the edge is software-related. Thus, while many hardware vendors already provide hardware that adequately supports most IoT solutions, the quality, sophistication, usability, and scalability of vendors’ software and platform for both thin and thick edge deployments remain a differentiator. While having the right software to suit enterprise needs is critical, choosing the right edge hardware can often be the key differentiator between an overly-complex, costly edge deployment and an effective one.
Thin Edge Hardware & Use Cases
A thin edge is an IoT solution that supports and manages decentralized deployments of low-powered, memory and power constrained devices. Some examples include Arm Cortex-M devices, low-power Texas Instruments (TI) devices, Marvell Technology devices, and others.
These devices transmit data northbound with minimal execution of workloads (e.g., filtering, aggregation, or normalization) or with analytics being performed at the site of data origin. Enterprises install thin edge nodes to connect legacy equipment to their cloud solutions, taking advantage of cost savings on equipment.