You guys have to understand why the boss is falsifying the accounts. It’s because he wants the good for all shareholders, all malaysians and every stakeholders. Share price go up, ho seh everyone happy, bo hoh meh? Walao you all.
did you not read that SCIB cancelled certain contracts with a dubai company. Someone pointed out that the contract awarder was only a cleaning company. Maybe need to clean up books for audit. Good luck to SCIB shareholders
----- The truths about SCIB's clients in Oman & Qatar here -----
Pavilion Qatar Engineering Co. W. L.L.
The second contract, given by Pavilion Qatar Engineering Co. W. L.L., is for civil works - fire water project (47,000 metres) at Ras Laffan Industrial City - Power Station - in Qatar valued at US$62mil (equivalent to RM252.84mil) and is expected to be completed in November 2021.
--->>> Pavillion Qatar ( pavilionqatar.com/organisation-chart.html ) is a cleaning company run by Indian nationals and is not licensed for Oil n Gas acitivities
--->>> SCIB will not be able to collect receivables for fictitious projects
Revenue International LLC
"PETALING JAYA: Sarawak Consolidated Industries Bhd’s wholly-owned subsidiary SCIB International (Labuan) Ltd has bagged three engineering, procurement, construction and commissioning (EPCC) contracts worth US$200.45 million (RM864.54 million).
The three contracts is for the 20 units of villa in Muscat, Oman awarded by Revenue International LLC for the period between April 5, 2020 to April 4, 2021..."
The client Revenue International LLC was registered in Oman in September 2018 CR Commercial Name: Revenue INTERNATIONAL Commercial Registration No: 1326105 Registration Date: 10/09/2018
Domain: revenueinternationalllc.com Created: 2018-09-15 15:35:35 UTC
Revenue International LLC's website at https://revenueinternationalllc.com provided the following service descriptions: Manpower Supply • General Helpers & Semi- Skilled Employees. • Skilled Employees such as Carpenters, Painters, Electricians, Steel Fixers, Masons, etc. • Skilled Employees such as Cleaning, Packing, Loading & Unloading, etc. • Office Boys, Housekeepers, etc. Carpentry, Electrical Services, Cleaning, Other Services - Painting, trained handymen, Tile Flooring, Waterproofing
--->>> Revenue International LLC is managed and staffed by Indian foreign workers --->>> primary business is cleaning services --->>> the only rotating equipment used are mops --->>> it's Commercial Registration Certificate is licensed for cleaning services --->>> Revenue International does not have licences for activites in repair and maintenance of mining, construction, and oil and gas field machinery; renting of mining and oilfield machinery and equipment; repair and maintenance of steam generators, turbines
Interceptor Trading & Contracting Co W.L.L
"Meanwhile, the group's wholly-owned subsidiary SCIB International (Labuan) Ltd has accepted the LOA for an EPCC contract in Qatar worth US$98 million (approximately RM399.35 million).
The client for the Qatar project is Interceptor Trading & Contracting Co W.L.L, according to SCIB."
TryMakeGoodBuy did you not read that SCIB cancelled certain contracts with a dubai company. Someone pointed out that the contract awarder was only a cleaning company. Maybe need to clean up books for audit. Good luck to SCIB shareholders 10/11/2021 9:19 PM
Solomolo... in my understanding, there are typically a few vehicles used by EY Group i.e Ernst & Young Plt (who does statutory audit and registered with the AOB), EY consulting (consulting & special work), EY Tax etc.. As stated in 2.24 od MMLR, the special auditor to do SIR means auditor other than the statutory auditor to do the statutory audit for the listed co. In this case EY uses EY Consulting to do SIR on Serba as they are not doing statutory audit on Serba. The statutory auditor for serba is now Nexia. I may be wrong, but this is my understanding.
As a shareholder, I defend the directors action on this issue…to me it’s just a common check and balance thing to ensure the authorities action is fair… we still remain the rights to challenge the decision made the authorised bodies to ensure no one is going above the law..
Only smart people know what Serbadk trying to play. All i know is Serbadk purposely find the bone from the egg.
You tell me until now they only realised EY consulting is not statutory auditor? One or two month not enough to realize is it?
Who care whether EY consulting is not a statutory auditor? As long as agreed job scope can be done with EY consulting company. So they blame to bursa for all of these things now due to no choice?
Why only complain after the findings found from EY? Why not before? Thought bursa will give Serbadk second chance to be alive.?
Just delaying tactic. Bursa ask SD to use EY. SD agreed to and made announcement that SD has appointed EY for SIR. Normally among the terms will be EY to report to Bursa for independence and to prevent insider trading. SIR came out in 30th sept if i remember correctly and ED of D and Bursa was briefed. Then SD not happy. Ask for hard copy which was subsequently given.
Meanwhile Karim deal with the shares and warrant. Bursa took action to prevent insider trading. Suspension was to ensure fair play.
The moment fake revenue is recorded, offences have been committed. Subsequent cancellation of the fake projects is irrelevant.
False or misleading statements, etc. 177. A person shall not make a statement, or disseminate information, that is false or misleading in a material particular and is likely to induce the sale or purchase of securities by other persons or is likely to have the effect of raising, lowering, maintaining or stabilising the market price of securities if, when he makes the statement or disseminates the information— (a) he does not care whether the statement or information is true or false; or (b) he knows or ought reasonably to have known that the statement or information is false or misleading in a material particular
Fraudulently inducing persons to deal in securities 178. (1) A person shall not— (a) by making or publishing any statement, promise or forecast that he knows to be misleading, false or deceptive; (b) by any dishonest concealment of material facts; (c) by the reckless making or publishing, dishonestly or otherwise, of any statement, promise or forecast that is misleading, false or deceptive; or (d) by recording or storing in, or by means of, any mechanical, electronic or other device, information that he knows to be false or misleading in a material particular, induce or attempt to induce another person to deal in securities.
Prohibited conduct of person in possession of inside information 188. (1) A person is an “insider” if that person— (a) possesses information that is not generally available which on becoming generally available a reasonable person would expect it to have a material effect on the price or the value of securities; and(b) knows or ought reasonably to know that the information is not generally available.
(2) An insider shall not, whether as principal or agent, in respect of any securities to which information in subsection (1) relates— (a) acquire or dispose of, or enter into an agreement for or with a view to the acquisition or disposal of such securities; or (b) procure, directly or indirectly, an acquisition or disposal of, or the entering into an agreement for or with a view to the acquisition or disposal of such securities.
(3) Where trading in the securities to which the information in subsection (1) relates is permitted on a stock market of a stock exchange, the insider shall not, directly or indirectly, communicate the information referred to in subsection (1), or cause such information to be communicated, to another person, if the insider knows, or ought reasonably to know, that the other person would or would tend to— (a) acquire, dispose of, or enter into an agreement with a view to the acquisition or disposal of, any securities to which the information in subsection (1) relates; or (b) procure a third person to acquire, dispose of or enter into an agreement with a view to the acquisition or disposal of, any securities to which the information in subsection (1) relates.
(4) A person who contravenes subsection (2) or (3) commits an offence and shall be punished on conviction to imprisonment for a term not exceeding ten years and to a fine of not less than one million ringgit.
Even delist, loyal supporters will remain strong behind K. kesian, mau jual balik pun tak boleh, well they deserve to be long term investors after all. Lucky rr88 and pak tua throw towels months ago.
Delists will be a funeral for Serbak. Oil and Gas companies need lots of working capital, listing status allowed them to tap funds from the capital markets via rights and borrowings. Without all these facilities Serbak will sink. As it is now the company is at the tail end of its life span with Chef still the MD. A new set of directors and management is crucial for its survival.
Posted by gemfinder > Nov 10, 2021 9:36 PM | Report Abuse
Beter delist la. Karim can do watever magic acc oso nobody cares. Kaakakaka
This book is the result of the author's many years of experience and observation throughout his 26 years in the stockbroking industry. It was written for general public to learn to invest based on facts and not on fantasies or hearsay....
BlessedInvestor
374 posts
Posted by BlessedInvestor > 2021-11-10 21:09 | Report Abuse
Next is to sue to Nexia plt...because cannot meet the deadline...