serbadk shareholders which are not happy can take legal action against karim ,......if they are willing to spend few hundred thousand on legal fee,.......but latter can ask karim to pay for it ,........SC &SC won`t do it,....not their investment.
in US,.....lawyers willing to take the job without pay,.......but not in malaysia,......in US,.if lawyer win the case,.....they will ask karim to pay their fee
With the henchman (who instructed various person(s) to abuse the government machinery and institutions to act against SD, being currently embroiled with the mysejahtera closed door wheeling and dealing and his impending expulsion from the Rembau seat), it is time to reveal and unmask the truth mastermind(s) of this whole fiasco.
The intent of the mastermind, who are able to infiltrate various government machineries and institutions (including audit firms) is one of financial gain.
Exploiting the mental weakness, naivety ignorance of the "minority" shareholders to fall hook line and sinker to the narrative.
SD was a company that had great potential especially in the IT and Aerospace segment and was slated to do great things for Malaysia, greater than the impact of 5G in Malaysia being done by DNB's RM30 billion project.
- Will MACC take action against the perpetrators who planned and executed this atrocious act against SD?
- Will MACC to take action against person/(s) in SC, Bursa and a particular media company? .
Everyone has different views. Some may want to exit asap. Some may want to buy even more if it drops considering it may still be a good investment in the long run.
$$$ EYC’s refusal to sign off the FFU appears to be connected to the fact that the FFU was an incomplete work product, it was not supposed to be in a distributable written form, it was not to be disclosed and EYC never gave permission to disclose the FFU. $$$
This very interesting Death Threat. "I will K..you and bring you down further. I think u know my capacity, try me, see what I can do". This thread made after SC raided the office. Trial date fixed 19/09/22. This guy from X Kpgg.
Neohts, the announcement by SD was in line with what Bursa wanted (From Bursa's Originating Summons). If Bursa does not lift the suspension, then I really dont know what else Bursa wants.
SD tak dapat mengemukakan FFU sebab FFU tiada tandatangan pengesahan dari EYC. Maksudnya dokumen FFU tu tiada pemilik. Bukan SD yang menerbitkan FFU tu tapi EYC. Kalo EYC pun tidak ingin megesahkannya, bagaimana SD akan mengeluarkan dokumen tu?
Kalo FFU tiada pengesahan siapa yg bertanggungjawab utk memberi penjelasan? Fikirkan la betul betul. Dalam kontrak, EYC bertanggungjawab menghasilkan Final Report, bukannya FFU. Tambahan pula, EYC sendiri yg kata FFU tidak boleh dikongikan dgn pihak luar. Hanya utk tujuan kajian dalaman. Bacalah betul2 dulu.
The Death Threat from a Former Independent Director A former director of the company namely Hasman Yusri bin Yusoff (“Hasman”) had issued a death threat to one of the executive directors of the company. Hasman had sent a text message to the executive director, which is reproduced as follows: “Dear…, Im giving you a notice to behave yourself. Im not hesitate to kill u or bring you down further. Dont push your f…ing luck. I think now you know my capacity. Try me, see what I can do. Just be careful.” The death threat was made on 15.6.2021, after the SC had raided the office of the company.
Another mentally challenged unable to accept audit procedure.
steven_c Kalo FFU tiada pengesahan siapa yg bertanggungjawab utk memberi penjelasan? Fikirkan la betul betul. Dalam kontrak, EYC bertanggungjawab menghasilkan Final Report, bukannya FFU. Tambahan pula, EYC sendiri yg kata FFU tidak boleh dikongikan dgn pihak luar. Hanya utk tujuan kajian dalaman. Bacalah betul2 dulu.
@Huang rasanya ngko la yg sakit jiwa. Penjelasan pun telah dikemukakan. Cuma kau je la yg sengaja tak ingin faham apa yg tertera dlm penjelasan. Kontrak pon telah terang2 kata sebarang laporan yg belum siap TIDAK BOLEH dikemukakan kpd pihak luar sehingga FINAL REPORT telah siap. Ini pon bukan Final Report.
This is the industry standard for FFU. Only Serba thinks it must be done in their special way. Even the judge said FFU dont need signature and told Serba to release the FFU, but Serba still doesn't want, and now go release this article? Isnt it contempt of court?
So many crazy people… all hope Serba can go back to the price they bought. Blame everyone but Karim. Who has 59 stamps of other companies? Who failed to paid their bond? Who have many untrackable untraceable unknown projects? Who is the one blaming everyone for their own fault? Who create fake invoice? Who got caught with fake invoice templates in their computer? Who got caught with email and sms telling their finance to fake the invoices?
If FFU dun need signature, SD should be happy to appoint another to write one in their favor..... then sky will be clear.... common sense says E&Y should sign off so that it carries weight in court to help prosecute the wrongdoers.
@Huang benda ni tak semudah yg ko fikirkan. Ko kena lihat dari sudut yg objektif. Jgn je asyik dengar dari satu pihak tanpa dengar dari penjelasan pihak tertuduh. Penjelasan yg dikeluarkan SD telah menyebabkan syak wasangka yang mana banyak lagi penjelasan dari ketiga-tiga pihak diperlukan.
Sebenarnya kenapa sesiapa yang berfikir lebih waras dan objektif dikatakan gila? SD tidak menyembunyikan fakta yang ia memperoleh 59 cop kompeni. Itu pun telah dimasukkan dalam tulisan penjelasan yg dikeluarkan cuma kita tidak mempunyai penjelasan yg cukup mengenainya. Bon mmg tak dpt dibayar disebabkan institusi bank telah menarik balik fasiliti kredit SD maka memerlukan masa utk menyelesaikan kes ini terlebih dahulu sblom ruangan kredit boleh diperoleh semula. Mmg betol template invois dijumpai yg blom dicerahkan pihak SD, maka SD perlulah beri penjelasan. Jadi tindakan yg diambil SD utk memberi pencerahan adalah wajar supaya pihak lain boleh memikir secara objektif. Benar atau salah, biarkan lah SD sendiri mempertahankan diri.
@Huang Xpe aku sendiri pun fasih proses auditing. Cuma beza antara ko dgn saya, aku lebih suka fikir secara objektif. Tapi biarkan la, mcm org putih suka kata "To each our own".
$$$ If FFU dun need signature, SD should be happy to appoint another to write one in their favor..... then sky will be clear.... common sense says E&Y should sign off so that it carries weight in court to help prosecute the wrongdoers. $$$
EYC had stated in writing that FFU is solely for SD internal use not to be distributed to any other third parties
SD attempt to seek EYC permission, but EYC refuse.
This book is the result of the author's many years of experience and observation throughout his 26 years in the stockbroking industry. It was written for general public to learn to invest based on facts and not on fantasies or hearsay....
8899EL8899
2,264 posts
Posted by 8899EL8899 > 2022-04-22 13:04 | Report Abuse
serbadk shareholders which are not happy can take legal action against karim ,......if they are willing to spend few hundred thousand on legal fee,.......but latter can ask karim to pay for it ,........SC &SC won`t do it,....not their investment.