from www.liihen.bolgspot.com .......By virtue of the foregoing, Tan Bee Eng is now caught red-handed under the same Section 84(1) in the sale and purchase of Lii Hen shares that did not involved any change of beneficial ownership because part of his sale proceed of RM 361,371.42 was used to purchase his Lii Hen shares by Dato' Goh
from www.liihen.blogspot.com ........ Together with his false trading price which caused a misleading appearance of active trading of Lii Hen shares, Tan Bee Eng should have been charged under the same Act together with Dato' Goh and Siow Chung Peng by now. The legal chain of criminal liabilities would also shackles all those who sold the Lii Hen shares from Avenue Securities under the same modus operandi.
Hey Securities Commission, are you going to do anything now that the evidences are out in the open???
While it is good, one thing to think about Lii Hen is its corporate governance. With so much related party transaction going on... for example this one...
Paragon Progress, Favourite Design, LH Furniture to purchase RM21.6 million Monthly from (1) Chua Lee Seng the lacquer, thinner and (2) Tan Bee Eng - principally involved furniture parts and (3) Tok Heng Leong in manufacturing (4) to award finishing works to Chua Yong Haup of coating, polyurethane, furniture parts and this one... Double Soon Huat FD to award sub-contract RM2.0 million Monthly to Chua Yong Haup's companies work for furniture parts and components sub-contractor,
why do we need a subcontracter in the family???!!!!
End result : (1) churning Lii Hen's annual turnover from A to B (2) pocketing some profits of Lii Hen privately, in the process of churning (3) what we see in the balance sheet may not be what it is!
Just IN : the way the board handled the 2012 AGM raises many red alert on its transparency and truthfulness.
Question : Is the high dividend payout a smoke screen to entice investors into its game?
very good n valid points :D Posted by xingxian > Jun 14, 2013 05:56 PM
While it is good, one thing to think about Lii Hen is its corporate governance. With so much related party transaction going on... for example this one...
Paragon Progress, Favourite Design, LH Furniture to purchase RM21.6 million Monthly from (1) Chua Lee Seng the lacquer, thinner and (2) Tan Bee Eng - principally involved furniture parts and (3) Tok Heng Leong in manufacturing (4) to award finishing works to Chua Yong Haup of coating, polyurethane, furniture parts and this one... Double Soon Huat FD to award sub-contract RM2.0 million Monthly to Chua Yong Haup's companies work for furniture parts and components sub-contractor,
why do we need a subcontracter in the family???!!!!
End result : (1) churning Lii Hen's annual turnover from A to B (2) pocketing some profits of Lii Hen privately, in the process of churning (3) what we see in the balance sheet may not be what it is!
Just IN : the way the board handled the 2012 AGM raises many red alert on its transparency and truthfulness.
Question : Is the high dividend payout a smoke screen to entice investors into its game?
As I clarified before, RM21.6m and RM2m is annual sum. The frequency of these types of transactions is monthly. So, this is not a valid point as RM24m is small compared to annual turnover.
Excuse me Sense maker, RM 24m is almost 8.2% of Lii Hen's cost of sales of RM 293m in 2012. or 112% of its profit after tax of RM 21.36m. You will allow looting like this?
I am not sure if 8% for lacquer, thinner, etc is reasonable as a component of production cost of furniture. I can live with it though. I was just rectifying the statement up there that states it is RM21.6m+RM2m every month whihc is grossly misleading.
Recurrent related party transactions exist in some companies and those who are not comfortable with the amounts should not hold the shares of that company.
It is an open market. We just have to make our own decisions.
Furniture stock? Account can be too good to be true. Look at Len Cheong last time. they can easily play with the inventories and material cost, like garment stock. This also partly explained the yo-yo results over the years
.....Both Tan Bee Eng and Chua Lee Seng are caught with their pants down in this false and misleading UMA announcement to Bursa Malaysia......looks like more shxt is coming out from this muar company...
8% as the cost of a bedroom sets is very high, that is only vanishing oil a few ringgit can buy you a bottle. RM 21.6m spent on thinner or lacquer can buy you a decent size swimming pool in Jalan Duta!
8% as the cost of a bedroom sets in thinner or lacquer is very high, that is only vanishing oil, a few ringgit can buy you a bottle. RM 21.6m spent on thinner or lacquer can buy you a decent size swimming pool in Jalan Duta!
Retweet : The Q2 result may be down by 20.55%, but hey look the board is also taking a precautionary action by slashing the dividend to 1.5%, half of what it used to be at previous announcement of results. Obviously future results will also not up to par going forward the way they are conserving cash now. Anyway, they are already 2 months into the physical Q3, only they know how bad it will be. Today's sell-down maybe the doing of insiders!
Note to Q2 Financial Report : Revenue for the current quarter dipped 16.02%, caused by the reduction in export sales mainly due to the sluggish demand for the bedroom sets products in Lii Hen Furniture Sdn Bhd and Favourite Design Sdn Bhd.
Lower sales generated and higher direct manufacturing expenses in the current quarter resultant the profit before tax to decrease 55.20%. The higher direct manufacturing expenses in the current quarter were mainly due to increase in the wage rate, more overtime incurred due to shortage of workers and payment and provision of bonus and incentive amounted to RM636,000 and RM375,000 respectively.
不祥的预兆 : Revenue for the current quarter dipped 16.02%, caused by the reduction in export sales mainly due to the sluggish demand for the bedroom sets products in Lii Hen Furniture Sdn Bhd and Favourite Design Sdn Bhd.
Lower sales generated and higher direct manufacturing expenses in the current quarter resultant the profit before tax to decrease 55.20%. The higher direct manufacturing expenses in the current quarter were mainly due to increase in the wage rate, more overtime incurred due to shortage of workers and payment and provision of bonus and incentive amounted to RM636,000 and RM375,000 respectively.
This book is the result of the author's many years of experience and observation throughout his 26 years in the stockbroking industry. It was written for general public to learn to invest based on facts and not on fantasies or hearsay....
keithchan
369 posts
Posted by keithchan > 2013-09-13 12:06 | Report Abuse
green colour one :)