maybe kenie does not have directors thinking........directors are disposing their shares to create panic selling amongst investor. once the price bottoming, they will buy back the shares with lower price
Reporting false info to bursa is serious offence. Why would ageson's owners do such thing when they can already have good life & big lunch with the existing contracts of Singapore and hongkong
if i'm the director, i'll do the same....positive audited QR, new contracts secured...i'll start selling and get some money first at current price..last month RM 0.07 woo....once investors panic, they'll sell their shares, price drops again, directors buying back......fuyyooo....
Fake contract?Jack up share price to cheat the public!?ALL Directors can go to jail if report to Bursa.Even insider trading minor offence can go to jail.It can not be fake.If you are sourcing sand from outside Malaysia,what sand permit you need?
When the company was making 4 to 5m a year in the past,the share price was 0.25 to 0.30.Yr2020 1st half already make 9m, without the so called fake sand contract yet!You can see for yourself,it is already huge improvement.
kenie, why don't you make a formal complaint to Bursa and SC about the "fishy" contract instead of barking here and there. It doesn't impact the share price and my decision to buy/hold the shares.
Already said the detractors cannot eat grape but call grape sour... How is this a fake contract? You go to MV and sight their Purchase Order la dei. People already dare you to go to their office to sight.
You can make one trip ride KTM go RM5 and you make few K's from informed investment but you refuse.. that's why you say the poor gets poorer..
loss and expenses (LE) is a sensitive issue. will offend client no doubt ......
in order to claim loss and expenses, u have to demonstrate ur entitlement of EOT. to do that u need to have the original baseline (original master programme). then u have to revise the programme by incorporate ur entitlement of EOT inside. by do that ur baseline become baseline 2 (example). then u have to justify ur expenses but putting in the expenses into that period.
example: 1. original rent 5 month of tower crane, now 7 months, u get 2 months. 2. original u pay wages to ur stuff 7 months, now 5 months
bear in mind not all is straight away stuff.
there are few dalays, culpable delay - contractor fault and therefore not entitle for LE nor EOT concurrent delay - both contractor and employer contribute to the delay, hence EOT entitle LE not entitle non culpable delay - employer/architect fault and contractor entitle both EOT and LE
babiking...... 1) u have to justify the programme first. example I demonstrate u the original baseline and revised baseline after 5 month of Extension of Time granted. base on the chart, u entitle 5 months and time, and ur LE have to base on the affected loss and expenses that direct related to the EOT that granted. Example, u granted 5 months EOT, however tower crane just require extra 3 months only and hence u entitle to claim 3 months renting cost of tower crane. however because ur project team still run until the end, so u entitle 5 months wages for ur project team. hence it's not everything automatically get 5 months.
depend on agreement, some contract impose a clause whereby on when come to loss and expense claim, u need to show the actual record (those actual receipt to show that u really spent this amount)
2) what claim u mean? I don't get u.
3) L&E is definitely entitle. however as I mention early, this is sensitive issue and client never like this. even contract prohibit u from claiming L&E, some contract impose the clause whereby loss and expense is not allow, however when come to construction work, those changes instructed by client is a variation and in some form, varying the original contract also is a "breach of contract" and remedy automatically come in which is in the form of L&E. not easy thing as a lot of justification require if u want to claim that much.
Guys...........I feel that the true question is "How can a contractor claim for disruption of work?"
Disruption often affects non-critical parts of a project, but not to the extent that those parts become critical. If a contractor was kept on site for longer than the contract period, it used to be accepted that the contractor would be able to recover overhead costs and loss of profit for the whole of the period of delay, provided that the delay or disruption of work was not due to its own fault of course.
Commonly, a contractor’s claim for delay or disruption relies on comparing anticipated with actual labor costs. This approach, however, is lacking in any kind of merit because there may be many reasons for the costs of labor being greater than the contractor anticipated at tender stage, other than reasons for which the employer or the architect can be held accountable.
An acceptable method of evaluating disruption is to compare: the value to the contractor of the work done per man during a period of no disruption, with the value per man doing the disrupted period, and then to apply the ratio obtained to the total cost of labor. It is obvious that, if this method is to work, the defendant (Employer / Architect) may argue that it must be possible to isolate a period free from disruption.
UraniumKing68, tower crane will climb itself as the building progress reach higher level by adding the mast. after complete, it will lower down itself also by dissemble the mast part by part as it lowering down. in here, most common tower crane we used is hammerhead and luffing crane.
1) best developer? I think buy property see ur budget since the property price is very much related to its location. in my opinion, those developer that doesn't squeeze the contractor to the max is the best 1. as the contractor get what he want and he build what the developer want. if the developer squeeze all the single cents from the contractor and contractor have no choice but to reduce the quality to comply to the cost. but since u asked, in my opinion the good developer are Selangor Dredging, Symphony Life, UM Land.
2) Engineer is consulting engineer where they design the building to suit to requirement of architecture and infrastructure of building.
Hi O'Brian, different measure will be taken depend on how severe the water leaking are and what kind of exposure of the surface. normally, they will just do pressure grout injection at the water leaking zone with each point for injection is very close to each other in order to fill in the water capillary within the slab.
Post a Comment
People who like this
New Topic
You should check in on some of those fields below.
Title
Category
Comment
Confirmation
Click Confirm to delete this Forum Thread and all the associated comments.
This book is the result of the author's many years of experience and observation throughout his 26 years in the stockbroking industry. It was written for general public to learn to invest based on facts and not on fantasies or hearsay....
momochick
194 posts
Posted by momochick > 2020-05-05 11:15 | Report Abuse
let see after 2.30