i m confused. Those who are positive on SD believe that the SIR has positive outcomes ? Or they believe that the price of SD will go up even if the outcomes of the SIR is negative ?
There is no need for argument here on the outcomes of the SIR because the share will remain suspended until after the SIR is released to the public. The point for argument is whether the price will go up or tank if the SIR is negative. Anyone believe the price will still go up if the SIR is negative ? If so, Why ?
the SIR needs to be released first before suspension can be uplifted. I know SC is very strict on this. Perhaps this is the only enforcement unit left in Malaysia with integrity..
As the SIR is verifying the identity of 11 customers and suppliers, a negative outcome means SD is falsifying trading accounts. This has very serious implications. The financial statements are no longer true and fair.
Since the Serba counter had been suspended... Those shares which traded within T + 2 how ya.. Those pp had sold the shares cant get the money and those who bought also with capital stuck at there.. This last minutes suspended has cause quite amount of capital stuck there pending further announcement before trading again... No SIR announcement, no trading for Serba After SIR announced, it could stop trading for one more day..
Kindly be advised that Bursa Securities had today issued a directive to SERBADK to:
(a) make an announcement on the findings from the Factual Findings Update on the Special Independent Review by 26 October 2021;
(b) announce Bursa Securities’ directive immediately; and
(c) impose a suspension of trading on SERABDK’s securities on the next market day after the directive deadline, in the event of non–compliance to the directive.
Cumulative earning of Serba is almost equal to Trade receivables...the amount close to RM 2 bil. Serba is not good in collecting money from clients or does the clients receivable exist ?
Why Serba want to acquire a supplier and customer at Bahrain ? Sound very suspicious...SIR report will know...
It is also looking into purchases from six local suppliers; IT contracts and transactions involving six customers and two suppliers, as well as the revenues and costs involved; and the transactions and balances involving one customer and one supplier in Bahrain.
(C) Further information relating to customer and supplier in Bahrain
Office address cannot be located on physical site for the supplier and customer
KPMG has noted fax contact number of the customer as indicated in the official website is registered under one of the group’s employee but using ‘Truecaller’ application.
Based on latest QR, revenue contribution from Bahrian look quite bad....drop 90% from last Q... What happened to Bahrian Customer... Can make a call to the customer to know the reason... KPMG suspected the customer located at Malaysia...
QoQ. Core profit was down -87% due to weaker performances from all of its business divisions, peculiarly its O&M segment. Regionally, we note lower revenue contributions from Malaysia (-6%), Saudi Arabia (-67%) and Bahrain (-90%).
Round 1 Serba vs KPMG.. I bet for item below the winner is KPMG....
SIR item required E & Y to verify...
(C) Further information relating to customer and supplier in Bahrain
Office address cannot be located on physical site for the supplier and customer
KPMG has noted fax contact number of the customer as indicated in the official website is registered under one of the group’s employee but using ‘Truecaller’ application.
maybe the SIR discovered tht Serba has 100k BTC stashed in a HDD n forgotten, since it’s significant so need more time to validate. Incidental findings.
brianklc maybe the SIR discovered tht Serba has 100k BTC stashed in a HDD n forgotten, since it’s significant so need more time to validate. Incidental findings. 24/10/2021 10:22 PM
All the old promoters gone in hiding or reborn using dupe account.
No doubt EY will confirm KPMG findings.
Dont be in the same room when shit hits the fan.
leno at 70 sen say hold until appoint new chairman at 60 sen say hold until appoint EY at 50 sen say hold until appoint new auditor at 40 sen say hold until quarter report out at 30 sen say hold until EY result out at 20 sen say hold until bursa take action at 10 sen say hold until suspended delisted at 1 sen.
This is not because they are scared or they admit they are guilty.(Pls dont misunderstand).
Auditors are generally required to be independent and objective during an audit, because they are responsible to issue an opinion on the truth and fairness of a company's financial statements(f/s).
They cannot be seen to be siding the directors due to fear or favour. Instead, they should be protecting shareholder's interests.
Board of directors are responsible over the preparation of f/s, and the f/s are then audited by the external auditors. The auditors will then issue their opinion to shareholders.
Notice there is a 3 party relationship here.
1)The auditors who audit the f/s, and
2)Directors who are responsible over the preparation of f/s and
3) The shareholders, who are the recipient of the f/s and the auditor's opinion.
Auditors work for the shareholders and not the board.
The board cannot exert their power or influence on the auditors. The legal case initiated by the board, however, shows otherwise.
So,
KPMG has no choice but to resign because they will no longer be able to audit the f/s objectively, there is now a perception that kpmg may compromise in the audit due to the fear over the outcome of the legal case.
(So, the safest thing to do, is resign, and this is the message to shareholders. Resignation is also strongly recommended by auditor's code of ethics)
The board's decision to take a legal action on KPMG represents an intimidation threat, where the board can be perceived as saying, you either accept what we say or face the consequences of the legal prosecution. (Although their true intention maybe something else)
The question now is:
Was there a need to take legal action on the auditor while the audit is not complete and call for a press conference to condemn the auditor, instead of explaining and solving the issues in hand?
Didnt the audit committee give a warning to the board about how a legal case will affect auditor's independence?
A legal case is a serious issue. Wasn't this discussed with all major shareholders? Did they call for an egm to discuss with shareholders, especially the majority or institutional shareholders, before proceeding?
To get more clarity,
We need to know who are the top 3 major shareholders of Serba Dinamik and whether they were consulted before the legal action was taken.
At the end of the day, KPMG will still need to face the legal case and protect their own reputation, and in the process, have to let the shareholders and authorities know their side of the story, with proper evidence.
This is not only about audit and accounting, its moving towards wider governance issues..
Since red flagged, SD down from RM1+ to 30c level now.
Promoters been saying buy buy buy.. buyers who listens are all stuck 70c 60c 50c 40c Plenty here stuck at above floors
30c seems impossible and we have promoters saying chop dick if it happens. Well no show apparently:
Be a smart investor, throw away all the noises. No matter what promoters say, they don’t dictate price nor have insider information . They are paid to do this job.
Post a Comment
People who like this
New Topic
You should check in on some of those fields below.
Title
Category
Comment
Confirmation
Click Confirm to delete this Forum Thread and all the associated comments.
New IPO: An enterprise IT solutions provider that provides implementation services, maintenance, support and professional services, Vetece Holdings Bhd aims to list on the Ace Market!
MQ Trader 322 views | 4 d ago
0:17
New IPO: A manufacturing and trading of biomass fuel products, particularly PKS and wood pellets company, Elridge Energy Holdings Bhd aims to list on the Ace Market!
This book is the result of the author's many years of experience and observation throughout his 26 years in the stockbroking industry. It was written for general public to learn to invest based on facts and not on fantasies or hearsay....
spyking
534 posts
Posted by spyking > 2021-10-24 19:46 | Report Abuse
So who collected Karim’s warrant? 4 million? Ikan bilis has so much money?