Originating summons mainly concern construction of law and documents. There will be no cross-examinations.
Please advise your other alternate personalities.
ǷearlꙌhite . Dear all,
We should write in to the relevant parties have the court case of Serba Dinamik aired live. It would be very useful for the investment community to see how issues are cross examined.
Wow! This forum is still active, although the counter is suspended since September 2021 due to incomplete SIR . I that guess it will remain to be suspended very very long time until total reform & purge takes place,starts with the top management.
Reminds me of the show 'A Beautiful Mind' a 2001 American biographical drama film based on the life of the American mathematician John Nash, a Nobel Laureate in Economics and Abel Prize winner.
Nash had paranoid schizophrenia and endured delusional episodes, and was obsessive in searching for hidden patterns in magazines and newspapers to thwart a hallucinated Soviet plot. He also delivered his results to a secret mailbox and believed that he was being followed.
In pearlblack's case, its a story of 'A Pitiful Mind'. The nominees article is comparing apple blossom with apple crumble pie.
If a sane person ought not debate with a Tanjung Rambutan patient, the same sane person also should not respond to pearlblack who is displaying schizophrenia and delusional episodes.
(However, I have just responded to the vongole. Am I sane?)
i3lurker psai3alert
lawyers at office dictating to sexytaries while digging nose and scratching private parts?
who the hell knows what a deranged TR wants anyway.
looking at deranged TR guy article on Beneficial Ownership already proven he knows peanuts about law.
Not declaring Beneficial Ownership is a very serious issue in finance, just like murder, rape and robbery of your own mother, sister and daughter at the same time. BTW that's what Azam Baki openly declared to have committed very happily.... 11/01/2022 12:13 PM
What do you meant by suspended by incomplete SIR? SIR was completed months ago, the only problem is Karim refuses to release it. Maybe you believe in Karim lies, have you asked yourself, how can Bursa file the SIR in court if it is incomplete? and why did Karim lodge a complain to have the file hidden from public view in the court system?
All those that shared article on KPMG on 1MDB lah, how SC is corrupt lah, how Bursa is bad lah.... hello, stop diverting the issue. when someone says your house got shit, you then go point at another house and says that house also got shit, and that house also, then refuses to admit your own house stinks.
serba got fraud issue, whatever issue about SC, KPMG, Bursa that is not related to Serba are noise. wake up and smell the shit karim shitted in your cup. stop drinking that piss karim pee into your morning coffee.... serba got fraud, karim is a cook.
What do you meant by suspended by incomplete SIR? SIR was completed months ago, the only problem is Karim refuses to release it. Maybe you believe in Karim lies, have you asked yourself, how can Bursa file the SIR in court if it is incomplete? and why did Karim lodge a complain to have the file hidden from public view in the court system? 11/01/2022 1:34 PM
Kaboom knows it is incomplete as it only highlighted RM1.5B of questionable transactions. EY didn't get round to the other 3B.
Ini macam vengeance by Bursa. First cakap report. Report sudah keluar kena suspend juga...macam macam. Investors mati...lorrr...guna kepala otak...lerrr...the movie continues
Trader got panas, capital stucked many months...ekeke come here to blame bursa...well you play with fire, got burned, who is to blame? Brain damage or wire got shorted?
chairman Datuk Mohamed Ilyas Pakeer Mohamed, Ilyas even threatened to get the government to ban KPMG from operating in Malaysia for destroying a good bumiputera company.
Serbadk PN17-ed! Malaysia's First EV Plant, Bitcoin To $100k! FIRL 13.9K subscribers
In this video, we discuss Serbadk slips into PN17, Malaysia's very first electric vehicle plant and Bitcoin's new target price - $100k!
*DISCLAIMER*
The information in this video is accurate as of the posting date. These are just the opinions of the FIRL Guys and do not in any way represent investment advice or stock recommendations, the content in this video is purely educational.
Information in the video might not be applicable to all investors as it does not take into account the financial circumstances, investment goals, and risk tolerance of any specific investors. Risk is inherent to all investing, including the permanent loss of capital. Past performance does not equal future results. We are not licensed by Malaysia's Securities Commission as financial/investment advisors. Please speak to a licensed financial advisor before making any financial decisions.
Jan 27 fixed for decision on Bursa's bid to compel Serba Dinamik to disclose review findings
KUALA LUMPUR (Jan 11): Bursa Malaysia Securities Bhd's application to compel Serba Dinamik Holdings Bhd to disclose the factual findings update (FFU) of its special independent review will be decided on Jan 27.
The High Court will on the same day decide whether to allow Serba Dinamik's application to expunge parts of Bursa's affidavit, which relate to the FFU.
Judicial commissioner Wan Muhammad Amin Wan Yahya fixed the date after the conclusion of submissions from both sides on Tuesday (Jan 11).
It is understood that Serba Dinamik's lawyers had replied to Bursa's counsel Datuk Loh Siew Cheang's submission on the issue, and Loh also replied on the issues raised by the company.
It is also learnt that counsel Chris Leong, who held a watching brief for the Securities Commission Malaysia (SC), also submitted during the proceedings.
The proceedings in chambers were conducted over video with no access to the media.
Last November, Bursa filed an originating summons to compel Serba Dinamik to disclose the FFU of the special independent review dated Sept 30, 2021 conducted by Ernst & Young Consulting Sdn Bhd (EY Consulting).
The legal action was taken due to Serba Dinamik's "failure to comply" with the stock exchange's directive on Oct 22 for the disclosure.
Serba Dinamik's lawyers on Tuesday argued that from the affidavits that it filed, the company has not committed any breach of the relevant requirements under the Main Market Listing Requirements (MMLR).
The oil and gas engineering company also asserted that there is no reason for the court to exercise its discretion to make any declaration to compel the company to reveal the findings.
"There is no evidential support for the letter of Oct 22, last year, by itself being the foundation of a purported breach of the MMLR. Further, the orders sought by Bursa are also in excess of Bursa's powers," Serba Dinamik's lawyers said in written submissions sighted by The Edge.
"What is most conspicuous is that EY Consulting is not a party to these proceedings and EY Consulting has not given consent to the publication of the FFU. Since EY Consulting is not willing to swear to the truth of the FFU and that EY Consulting is unwilling to undertake compliance with the MMLR, there is basis upon which for the court to consider whether the FFU will meet the requirements of paragraphs 9.03 and 9.35A of the MMLR," they added.
Serba Dinamik's lawyers further claimed that Bursa did not come to court with clean hands and its powers are contractual, and that it is not the function of the court to rewrite the MMLR or to add to any power that does not exist.
Bursa says FFU is not hearsay evidence Bursa previously submitted that the FFU is not a hearsay document as claimed by Serba Dinamik.
Loh, the exchange operator's lawyer, said the company had tried to stop the disclosure of the FFU on its special independent review partly because it referred to documents seized by the SC during its raid on the company.
He also disputed the assertion that the FFU is unverified and therefore cannot be disclosable material information, saying the defendant is "engaging in a game of words".
"As a matter of fact, the damning documents in the FFU in the form of exhibits/appendices are the defendant's documents seized by the SC during a raid that lasted three days and the special independent review refers to those documents.
"In substance, it is these documents that Serba Dinamik wants to keep as a mystery and secret," Loh asserted.
Serba Dinamik has also filed suit against Bursa Securities to nullify the special independent review, arguing that the directives by the stock exchange to appoint EY Consulting to undertake the review was in excess of its power, among others.
The issue with Serba Dinamik first came up when its external auditor KPMG raised certain issues involving its financials for the 12 months ended Dec 31, 2020. The matter snowballed into a litigation by the company against the auditor, prompting regulators to step in, including a raid by the SC on the company's office.
On Monday, Bursa said trading of Serba Dinamik's shares would remain suspended until further notice, although the company already issued its outstanding annual report for the 18 months ended June 30, 2021, on Jan 6.
This was because the company had not complied with its directive to make an announcement on the findings from the FFU, said Bursa.
Not to mention their annual report… it is so blur so small, they purposely upload a low resolution version so that it is too hard to read and hope people will give up reading or misread some numbers.
Arrogant society parasite is boasting great about a ' conman ' company and talking through his oral rear hole or what? ................................................................................................. Huatexpert chairman Datuk Mohamed Ilyas Pakeer Mohamed, Ilyas even threatened to get the government to ban KPMG from operating in Malaysia for destroying a good bumiputera company.
@ Trader 2 totally agree with you. I may have lost a lot of money, but I condone such con people and company. It's all about integrity and moral values. Hv put behind a long time ago. Chin up.
"What is most conspicuous is that EY Consulting is not a party to these proceedings and EY Consulting has not given consent to the publication of the FFU. Since EY Consulting is not willing to swear to the truth of the FFU and that EY Consulting is unwilling to undertake compliance with the MMLR, there is basis upon which for the court to consider whether the FFU will meet the requirements of paragraphs 9.03 and 9.35A of the MMLR," they added.
Going by this, I guess the chance of the SIR will be completed is anywhere between slim to none.
This book is the result of the author's many years of experience and observation throughout his 26 years in the stockbroking industry. It was written for general public to learn to invest based on facts and not on fantasies or hearsay....
Nikmon
2,995 posts
Posted by Nikmon > 2022-01-11 10:55 | Report Abuse
Or maybe this stupoood pearwhite bet toooo big in SD, tooooo big to lose.
Pls don't pollute pinang ocean.....