tis counter has no fundamental... is jz supported by Sing Dollar at d moment.... exchange rate in their favour n high... but in time ur be made lunch of by them who r "superior"
Investing in PMCorp is a very safe thing to do. It has all the upside potential as its quality assets less all liabilities is worth more than its present share price. It business in chocolate is small but profitable. Potential to be the next Nestle? I think this statement is too far fetched.
Balance sheet healthy and no sign of burning of cash. there is little or no downside unless the major shareholders squander away the money it has.
Posted by houseofordos > Oct 16, 2013 09:47 AM | Report Abuse Calvin & KC, I m curious why PMCorp would undertake capital reduction ? Why not just pay out a special dividend ? Normally I would expect them to do this to wipe out the accumulated losses and put them in better financial standing. But current par value is RM0.5, what is the new par value ? Honestly I ve not seen companies in Bursa with par value of RM0.3 or RM0.4. Closest is maybe RM0.2. Not sure if there is any rules on this, So if assuming new par value RM0.2, their cash on hand is only RM0.19, this is not enough for cash distribution to shareholder unless they borrow from bank or sell more assets. Please educate me. Many thanks
I was waiting for calvin to answer this as I think he knows the details already. This thing is new to me also. But can I put forward what I think? do I have to make any disclaimer, as I really am not sure of this? What the heck, I just go ahead.
Looking at PMCorp's 2012 audited account on the equity portion of the balance sheet, it has 30.5m of treasury shares and 41m in accumulated losses. There is no retained earnings which is a distributable reserves. Dividends can only be distributed from distributable reserve in retained earnings. Hence PMCorp has to do a capital reduction, to cancel off the treasury shares, and wipe off the accumulated losses and create some kind of "profit" as "retained earnings". Then only it can distribute dividends. exactly how they are going to do it, I don't know.
KC, ok thanks for the explanation. So i guess the main purpose is mainly to unlock the value and allow it to pay dividends. Still not sure on what new par value will be though and how much cash distribution... Par value reduction is never positive in my mind with what I ve seen with MAS... Of course reason may be different for the latter...
hv 94mil cash in hand.. but hv 84mil owing to its subsidiaries... so is tis cash free for use???
n look at d impairment loss made on loans to its subsidiaries (due to its subsidiaries cannot pay up).. it is a huge 642mil n increasing..,, 2012 4 mil 2011 6 mil...... original loan amount was 852mil....
d scary thing is it is increasing every year....
so owed by subsidiaries cannot collect... but owing to subsidiaries hv to pay.... so how? cash getting smaller n smaller la....
n hello d one who pay u d dividend is d company not d group ok
house.... ya how can par value reduction b positive especially for PMCORP where there is huge losses to clear... n which d term capital REDUCTION is more appropriate...
n since whn has capital cancellation due to losses... where 1000 shares r reduced to say 200 is celebrated n keenly awaited?!? 16/10/2013 12:12
Very funny, those who disagreed with Calvin still hang around here and persuade others not to believe Calvin. I think the rational persons who don't believe Calvin should just walk a way to look for other greener pasture instead of wasting here.
ya,how come ah? If Calvin's a fake,then how come I make good money from PMCORP. First bought at 17-18 cents,sold off at 23.5 cents. Reload again at 21-22 cents again.
Today is big day in US. Yesterday US market down so much at a very last minutes when the proposal was rejected. Negative watch by Fitch. People seems don't care over here. For counter like PM Corp, MUI, I am holding back my decision to jump in until this has been cleared. Kalau positive, surely grabbed some as investor.
where's calvin? where's his answers to my questions? where's his answer to kcchong latest 'how' question? is he roaming again here and there?is he an insider from pmcorp...the mastermind of 'might-be-goreng-only' of pmcorp?
Tan Sri Dato' Khoo Kay Peng and friends has been big collector of pmcorp i April 2013...and now he has at least 471,146,200 ...gila banyak..wa takut ini org bila dump...langit pun tak runtuh...jantung mesti boleh runtuh ...pedih...for now ..not yet...volume is not high enough to dump zillion of shares...and the price target...now ..might not what is in tan sri's mind...wa takut bila tiba itu masa...syhhh
Those losses have already realized as shown, haven't they? That is why its equity have reduced through the years and hence NTA is only 44 sen per share.
In essence, that is history. For example, last time your share portfolio was worth 2m, and you are only willing to part with it at 1.8m say. Now your portfolio is only 50,000, but you are willing to sell to me at 30,000. Why don't I take? --- my comment: these comments made me very curious...this is not kcchong's way...is it? why don't he just look at the 1st page??? can he just ignored the SECOND QUARTER ENDED 30 JUNE 2013..and claim it 'also' to be history? baru 3 bulan dah? or if that's not the case...that he was only referring to statement B14...not the 1st page...can kcchong pretend that he doesn't see anything in it? isn't that poooor result? ...oh may be 3 months ago punya cerita...is defined as history? musykil..before kcchong likes to post historical profits for counters in discussion?...now history...is not so important --- sorry kcchong..wa memang tak boleh lawan lu...but..this one...u seems has adapted to apa nama...evolution?
Now his children is asking for money because of oversea education,, buying their own home or whatever need etc etc.
Supposing that the durian plantations are just bearing fruits after 7 years of planting, and the fruits harvested are still few in the initial years. There isn't enough cash for payout. We call this earnings for dividend payment. Few durians. Little income. How to pay dividend?
However, the father decides to liquidate part of his RM300 Millions investment in Other Businesses. So he sold of his shares in Bank of East Asia (BEA) HK,(5 Million Shares) Johan shares.& others.
He also sold off some property - example NFI Warehouse, S'pore (RM39.7 Millions)
Now the father having sold off Some Shares & some real estate has netted a Whopping RM141 Millions in CASH. (He still has A LOT MORE INVESTMENT & REAL ESTATE LEFT)
Since he decided to target his investment in his durian plantation by planning to export to Japan & Worldwide, he has cut down on other investments. So he consolidate his future investment into one - Durian plantation - in this cast NFI Chocolate Manufacturing.
So he is distributing CAPITAL FROM SALES OF OTHER INVESTMENTS & REAL ESTATE, nothing to do with earnings from durian plantation as yet.(Dividend yet future)
In Future The Children can Expect Further CASH DISTRIBUTION.from all 3 Investments. You see as the NFI Sales Improved like Dutch Lady, Hup Seng Biscuit, Nestle, F & N & other Consumer Food & Drink Companies; there is NO NEED FOR HIGH NTA.
Look at Nestle's Price: RM68.00. Now look at NESTLE'S NTA (Net Tangible Asset) RM2.47
NESTLE HAS AN NTA OF RM2.47 ONLY? BETULKAH? DUA RINGGIT EMPAT PULUH TUJUH SEN SAHAJA! Check It Out: Nestle indeed has an NTA of RM2.47 only!
A Food Company Is CASH GENERATING. No Need High NTA. Warren Buffet like SEE'S CANDY BECAUSE SEE'S CANDY GENERATE CASH FOR HIM TO INVEST IN OTHER UNDERVALUE COMPANIES.
Now You See. You Can Have The Cake (in this case Chocolate) & Eat It, Too!
Those losses have already realized as shown, haven't they? That is why its equity have reduced through the years and hence NTA is only 44 sen per share.
In essence, that is history. For example, last time your share portfolio was worth 2m, and you are only willing to part with it at 1.8m say. Now your portfolio is only 50,000, but you are willing to sell to me at 30,000. Why don't I take? --- my comment: these comments made me very curious...this is not kcchong's way...is it? why don't he just look at the 1st page??? can he just ignored the SECOND QUARTER ENDED 30 JUNE 2013..and claim it 'also' to be history? baru 3 bulan dah? or if that's not the case...that he was only referring to statement B14...not the 1st page...can kcchong pretend that he doesn't see anything in it? isn't that poooor result? ...oh may be 3 months ago punya cerita...is defined as history? musykil..before kcchong likes to post historical profits for counters in discussion?...now history...is not so important --- sorry kcchong..wa memang tak boleh lawan lu...but..this one...u seems has adapted to apa nama...evolution?
What are you talking about anbz? Are you talking about the term I used "NTA"? If so then there is a mistake there. Because it should be NAB, or net asset backing. But you don't seem to talk about that, because I am not sure you know the difference.
So the NBA of PMCorp is 44 sen as shown in my post as re-posted by you. That is based on the information as shown in the latest balance sheet on 30 June 2013. So what is wrong with that?
The first page? Poorer result? Oh you are talking about its net income, aren't you? But have I been talking about its net income? Did I say based on its net income, its share should worth so much so much?
Come on anbz, try learning some valuations somewhere. There are basically two main valuation methods; asset based, or earnings based. I never used earnings based method to value PM Corp, because if you have read my posts on PMCorp, I think its earnings is not significant at this moment. But it still earn some money from its food and confectionery business though. Its earnings may expand according to calvin.
anbz.... now u know kcchongnz is flawed in many many ways
jz one example here.. tis is his favourite... "plant machinery debtors r not quality assets... cash is"
so u c pmcorp is a wet dream to him.. as pmcorp sets out to sell its property plant machine etc .. which it has bin doing for a few yrs to hv cash tat it badly needed....
as d sales continue d feeling is getting more n more intense... n wil climate whn pmcopr sold off all its assets n jz hv only cash in d bank...
but u think make sense or not?? "plant machinery not quality asset" so don't buy plant machinery... "debtors r not quality asset" so don't make any sales....
as long as thr is cash..."quality" asset "quality NTA"..... crappy result can b over looked as u hv noted
Posted by calvintaneng > Oct 17, 2013 12:28 PM | Report Abuse newbiestockreturns, please go and see a psychiatrist. if you need my help call Calvin at 014 6101668
Newbaby, so easy assessment of you by others!Priceless! Hahahahahahahahahahahah
This book is the result of the author's many years of experience and observation throughout his 26 years in the stockbroking industry. It was written for general public to learn to invest based on facts and not on fantasies or hearsay....
JCool
961 posts
Posted by JCool > 2013-10-16 11:07 | Report Abuse
tis counter has no fundamental... is jz supported by Sing Dollar at d moment.... exchange rate in their favour n high... but in time ur be made lunch of by them who r "superior"