Errr.... there's over RM200M outstanding loan in Karim's margin account.
Can he use the money in the suppliers' accounts (say from Kekal Jitu Sdn Bhd that has only one employee, who confirmed that she was the administrative executive of the company and had just joined the company on March 1, 2021)?
Loan outstanding 28/06/2021 RM280,000,000 - 46,300,000 x 0.3625 = RM263,216,250 29/06/2021 RM263,216,250 - 61,707,000 x 0.3525 = RM241,464,532 29/06/2021 RM241,464,532 - 95,000,000 x 0.3525 = RM207,977,032 30/06/2021 RM207,977,032 - 10,178,200 x 0.3275 = RM204,643,671 01/07/2021 RM204,643,671 - 22,000,000 x 0.3800 = RM196,283,671 12/07/2021 RM196,283,671 + 10,000,000 x 0.4688 = RM200,971,671 12/07/2021 RM200,971,671 + 5,000,000 x 0.3275 = RM202,609,171 12/07/2021 RM202,609,171 + 2,500,000 x 0.3125 = RM203,390,421 12/07/2021 RM203,390,421 + 1,000,000 x 0.3475 = RM203,737,921
"Under the second scope of EY Consulting’s findings for the SIR, in respect of the concerns raised by KPMG regarding six identified local suppliers, EY Consulting similarly raised concerns on the veracity of the transactions with the six, stated the court documents. The recorded transactions and other amounts were found to be more than RM638 million."
shareinvestor888 IF SC managed to show conclusive proofs that Serba did falsify as alleged in the charges, Then Next Big Question is Where did the Bank loans & Bonds Proceeds go to?
Who would then investigate Serbak’s Ceo & management on where the money from bonds & bank loans went to? Or impossible to investigate? 30/12/2021 11:31 AM
i3lurker will be the best person to explain how the "Circle Fraud" took place.
--
KPMG was unable to ascertain the existence of the suppliers in question as well as the appropriateness of the purchases made during the year.
In its findings, company searches on Serba Dinamik’s local suppliers raised several common red flags. Two of the suppliers had the same incorporation date of April 23, 2019, while five suppliers with a paid-up capital of RM100,000 have the same registered office.
What is more concerning is that KPMG noted that each supplier was owned by an individual shareholder with transactions ranging between RM60 million and RM96 million.
The two suppliers that were incorporated on the same date also share the same business address. However, when the auditors paid a visit to determine the physical existence of the suppliers, they were unable to locate the suppliers at both their business and registered addresses.
---
shareinvestor888 Noted @PSAi3alert…. If suppliers were paid, then need to investigate where were the paid supplies? Were the suppliers ‘ goods used for the projects? Was Serbak paid for projects completed?
If yes, why SC alleged false statements? So many questions need to be answered by Serbak… 30/12/2021 11:54 AM
the investors lost almost everything. another 1mdb saga in making. the lawyers will make all their wits to save the culprits. i hope karma to work on their entire family of the culprits and the people who try to save these people forgetting the poor investors.
Noted @PSAi3alert…. If suppliers were paid, then need to investigate where were the paid supplies? Were the suppliers ‘ goods used for the projects? Was Serbak paid for projects completed?
If yes, why SC alleged false statements? So many questions ________
As mentioned by the promoter armadalucky, ask these questions at AGM? So when will be the AGM? Who knows?
Go to telegram group and hunt down those that told you guys to average down, got 1 guy kept showing photos of him and SCIB boss and Karim, saying everything BAU and then say something to do with red bean army... go find that guy
What do you mean where is sc integrity? They already charge karim, you expect them to detect fraud the moment it starts? That is like blaming the police for future crimes.
Posted by MiaoMiao7 > Dec 30, 2021 1:06 PM | Report Abuse
What do you mean where is sc integrity? They already charge karim, you expect them to detect fraud the moment it starts? That is like blaming the police for future crimes.
SGX take initiative check on the quarterly/annual report and will question company on any suspicious item even if accounting firm found nothing wrong
Dont waste yr time here lah. Transmile CEO was charged in 2007 n found guilty in 2020. 13 years saga.
Write off the lost money n move on. Otherwise you wud go crazy like this mabel. All the more beautiful cover is to cover the deep sorrow n sadness inside. Its called crazy.
I wonder if Serba is a going concern? With clients and suppliers pulling out can’t see how this can be? I wonder if staff have been paid? No news on BAU activities. No one with brains would enter into any contract with this company ..unless new management is appointed.
yeah... i wonder if there is a new management could solve this one. maybe, because they are the one who will made a good decision
Posted by Riaz1954 > Dec 30, 2021 2:37 PM | Report Abuse
I wonder if Serba is a going concern? With clients and suppliers pulling out can’t see how this can be? I wonder if staff have been paid? No news on BAU activities. No one with brains would enter into any contract with this company ..unless new management is appointed.
This book is the result of the author's many years of experience and observation throughout his 26 years in the stockbroking industry. It was written for general public to learn to invest based on facts and not on fantasies or hearsay....
PSAi3alert
982 posts
Posted by PSAi3alert > 2021-12-30 11:34 | Report Abuse
Errr.... there's over RM200M outstanding loan in Karim's margin account.
Can he use the money in the suppliers' accounts (say from Kekal Jitu Sdn Bhd that has only one employee, who confirmed that she was the administrative executive of the company and had just joined the company on March 1, 2021)?
Loan outstanding
28/06/2021 RM280,000,000 - 46,300,000 x 0.3625 = RM263,216,250
29/06/2021 RM263,216,250 - 61,707,000 x 0.3525 = RM241,464,532
29/06/2021 RM241,464,532 - 95,000,000 x 0.3525 = RM207,977,032
30/06/2021 RM207,977,032 - 10,178,200 x 0.3275 = RM204,643,671
01/07/2021 RM204,643,671 - 22,000,000 x 0.3800 = RM196,283,671
12/07/2021 RM196,283,671 + 10,000,000 x 0.4688 = RM200,971,671
12/07/2021 RM200,971,671 + 5,000,000 x 0.3275 = RM202,609,171
12/07/2021 RM202,609,171 + 2,500,000 x 0.3125 = RM203,390,421
12/07/2021 RM203,390,421 + 1,000,000 x 0.3475 = RM203,737,921
Shares movement
28/06/2021 1,004,061,570 - 46,300,000 = 957,761,570 (0.3625 avg high low)
29/06/2021 957,761,570 - 61,707,000 = 896,054,570 (0.3525 avg high low)
29/06/2021 896,054,570 - 95,000,000 = 801,054,570 (0.3525 avg high low)
30/06/2021 801,054,570 - 10,178,200 = 790,876,370 (0.3275 avg high low)
01/07/2021 790,876,370 - 22,000,000 = 768,876,370 (0.3800 avg high low)
12/07/2021 768,876,370 + 10,000,000 = 778,876,370 (0.4688 avg purchase)
30/09/2021 778,876,370 + 5,000,000 = 783,876,370 (0.3275 avg high low)
01/10/2021 783,876,370 + 2,500,000 = 786,376,370 (0.3125 avg high low)
22/10/2021 786,376,370 + 1,000,000 = 787,376,370 (0.3475 avg high low)