I doubt AA will in profit UNLESS they reduce to expand on other industries. Need at least 2 years and no gurantee of lockdown. Plus currently new variant coming.
Glove counter going to shoot up. OMG Market crash around the world. New variant from South Africa now confirm in Belgium. EU in full alert. Brace for impact guys. Glove going back as darling on this tsunami. But for airline ...sad story ahead. Sayonara.
Haha i3lurker, What happen in AAX is precursor to what will happen to AA but still got people feel they are lucky in AA and praise TF and IBs.
Posted by rulethemarket > Nov 24, 2021 12:24 PM | Report Abuse Smart move by TF and IBs to separate AA and AAX, i pity AAX shareholders! lucky us here!
thats why rapists always claim those women enjoyed the rape and they were very lucky to be raped
Posted by Sslee > Nov 27, 2021 9:32 AM | Report Abuse
Haha i3lurker, What happen in AAX is precursor to what will happen to AA but still got people feel they are lucky in AA and praise TF and IBs.
Posted by rulethemarket > Nov 24, 2021 12:24 PM | Report Abuse Smart move by TF and IBs to separate AA and AAX, i pity AAX shareholders! lucky us here!
Peter Bernstein writes in his brilliant book Against the Gods –
Survival is the only road to riches. Let me say that again: Survival is the only road to riches. You should try to maximize return only if losses would not threaten your survival and if you have a compelling future need for the extra gains you might earn.
Run as fast as u can. Rm0.90 for co loss of billions. Plus covid uncertainty always discover new variant. Still 0.90 cents??? With all that being said, ony 0.20 cents fit to this co.
Iseeyoubuy Yeah, lets put this ungrateful Malaysian that is taking advantage of his fellow Malaysians in jail. Don't worry about AA, there will always be another to fill the void created with AA winding up. MAVCOM should stop AA from operating in Malaysia completely if they are not going to refund "CUSTOMERS"
Like they say "If we are going to get $5 for every $1000", they might as well be dead. I am prepare to by-pass my nasi lemak, kaya toast and teh tarik, just for the pleasure of seeing this mob dead! Yeh, I am a very bitter, unhappy ex-customer who will never be back. BETTER BELIEVE IT, THERE ARE MORE LIKE ME OUT THERE. It's just that most of us Malaysian are not prepared to stand up and be counted, which is why it took us so long to knock off Barisan.
Also , I think there is a case for CBT to be file against all the Directors. First of all, the customer's money does not belong to you, you never delivered anything in return for their payment. This mean the money should have been held in trust and not be used to pay off your creditors. Secondly, if like Benyamin Ismail say "the company cannot afford refunds as it does not have enough cash flow", then why are they still allowed to operate. If a Director allows an insolvent company to continue then they are personally liable. Maybe there is some smart legal firm out there who might see the opportunity to organise a class action against all the Directors on behalf of all customers who have prepaid. According to Gunasegaram there is $500million of advance payments. I think there should be enough cut out of this to pay the lawyers. All the lawyers need is for all advanced payment customers to come to them to take this action. Better than $5 out of $1000.
Under certain circumstances, directors may be liable for debts incurred by the company when the company is unable to pay those debts, as and when they fall due (the company is insolvent). This is because one of the fundamental duties of a director of any company is to ensure that the company does not trade while it is insolvent
Posted by EVO118 > Nov 27, 2021 11:21 PM | Report Abuse
Also , I think there is a case for CBT to be file against all the Directors. First of all, the customer's money does not belong to you, you never delivered anything in return for their payment. This mean the money should have been held in trust and not be used to pay off your creditors. Secondly, if like Benyamin Ismail say "the company cannot afford refunds as it does not have enough cash flow", then why are they still allowed to operate. If a Director allows an insolvent company to continue then they are personally liable. Maybe there is some smart legal firm out there who might see the opportunity to organise a class action against all the Directors on behalf of all customers who have prepaid. According to Gunasegaram there is $500million of advance payments. I think there should be enough cut out of this to pay the lawyers. All the lawyers need is for all advanced payment customers to come to them to take this action. Better than $5 out of $1000.
Any director who knows that the company is insolvent and makes the decision to continue to trade, and in doing so increases the debts of the company can be made liable for the company debts.[2]
A proprietary remedy, if imposed, will have effects and implications on third parties. Whilst there are arguments that courts can consider when imposing a remedy of this nature when a constructive trust is used, it is important that any discretion is exercised based on guiding principles.
It is important to note that the English Courts, when allowing for a proprietary remedy have done so in recognition of an institutional constructive trust. That is the reason why a proprietary claimant will take priority over unsecured creditors (Goode, 2011).
In this light, Peter Millet had made if the discretion is done in accordance to settled principles, "… the grant of a proprietary remedy causes no injustice to the creditors of an insolvent defendant. The doctrine of English Law is that, proprietary remedies should be granted only in defined circumstances and then ordinarily as a matter of course, so that rights of property may be fixed and ascertainable in advance" (Millet, 1998).
It is interesting to note that the Australian position as discussed above also insists on caution when the courts are faced with a situation and that remedial constructive trust is not be used as the first remedy that comes to mind. There is no uncontrolled exercise of judicial discretion. The Australian Courts may have done so on a different basis, since constructive trusts in Australia are imposed as a remedial constructive trust.
It is well established that the Malaysian Courts have stated that in Malaysia, a constructive trust will be imposed as a remedial device. However, in light of the arguments shared above, it is important that the Malaysian Courts first identify the parameters of the exercise of any discretion or such a remedial device. It is humbly submitted that the Malaysian courts could use these views from academicians and cases across the commonwealth as a "commonwealth yardstick" when exercising discretion whether or not to impose a constructive trust whilst rearranging the perspective of the law to suit the Malaysian flavor and circumstances
i3lurker yes you are right
Under certain circumstances, directors may be liable for debts incurred by the company when the company is unable to pay those debts, as and when they fall due (the company is insolvent). This is because one of the fundamental duties of a director of any company is to ensure that the company does not trade while it is insolvent
Posted by EVO118 > Nov 27, 2021 11:21 PM | Report Abuse
Also , I think there is a case for CBT to be file against all the Directors. First of all, the customer's money does not belong to you, you never delivered anything in return for their payment. This mean the money should have been held in trust and not be used to pay off your creditors. Secondly, if like Benyamin Ismail say "the company cannot afford refunds as it does not have enough cash flow", then why are they still allowed to operate. If a Director allows an insolvent company to continue then they are personally liable. Maybe there is some smart legal firm out there who might see the opportunity to organise a class action against all the Directors on behalf of all customers who have prepaid. According to Gunasegaram there is $500million of advance payments. I think there should be enough cut out of this to pay the lawyers. All the lawyers need is for all advanced payment customers to come to them to take this action. Better than $5 out of $1000. 27/11/2021 11:34 PM
Omicron will be very negative for Airlines, banks, O&G, recovery stocks etc. Equities and oil prices will be adversely affected. The speed and manner of Omicron development already indicated that the Covid-19 pandemic is far from over. It will be flight to safety from Monday onwards.
Good morning i3lurker, So if the company total capital is negative RM 5.9 billion as at 30/09/21 is the company still legally allowed to do RI: 7-YEAR REDEEMABLE CONVERTIBLE UNSECURED ISLAMIC DEBT SECURITIES ("RCUIDS") AT NOMINAL VALUE OF RM0.75 EACH BASED ON THE SHARIAH PRINCIPLE OF MURABAHAH (VIA TAWARRUQ ARRANGEMENT) WITH 0.5 FREE DETACHABLE WARRANT?
TQVM i3lurker for the explanation. One more question since RCUIDS come with an 8% profit sharing per annum over 7 years. So If AA make loss in FY 2022 and FY2023 then AA can legally not paying the 8% profit sharing to the ICUIDS holders for FY 2022 and FY 2023?
Haha i3lurker, I thought I found risk free investment in Insas and Insas should give me reasonable good dividend better than 2.5 cents based on FY21 EPS of 36.53 cents.
Post a Comment
People who like this
New Topic
You should check in on some of those fields below.
Title
Category
Comment
Confirmation
Click Confirm to delete this Forum Thread and all the associated comments.
This book is the result of the author's many years of experience and observation throughout his 26 years in the stockbroking industry. It was written for general public to learn to invest based on facts and not on fantasies or hearsay....
i3lurker
13,689 posts
Posted by i3lurker > 2021-11-26 17:02 |
Post removed.Why?