the cause of larger than expected fluctuations in refinery profits.......
“The price of petroleum products at the retail level is not directly related to the crude oil price. The retail price closely follows the price of refined products, which may vary for different product types,” said Tan Sri Dr Mohd Irwan Serigar Abdullah in an NST article in January 2016.
what it means is very clear and simple...its a road to investment success....buy when you believe it is low enough, keep and sell when you believe you have make enough money......
looks like a formula for printing money.............
the cause of larger than expected fluctuations in refinery profits.......
“The price of petroleum products at the retail level is not directly related to the crude oil price. The retail price closely follows the price of refined products, which may vary for different product types,” said Tan Sri Dr Mohd Irwan Serigar Abdullah in an NST article in January 2016.
what it means is very clear and simple...its a road to investment success....buy when you believe it is low enough, keep and sell when you believe you have make enough money......
looks like a formula for printing money.............
Adultery is not allowed in marriage n the innocent party can have the rights to divorce n free to remarry again without sinning.But whoever marries the guilty party is committing adultery according to the scriptures.
Adultery is not allowed in marriage n the innocent party can have the rights to divorce n free to remarry again without sinning.But whoever marries the guilty party is committing adultery according to the scriptures. =========
we are Chinese..As Chinese I believe all marriages can work as long as no adultery. ...money, properties, habits, characters, beauty, ulginess, none of these are the deal breakers in the absence of adultery.
wat the ..... happen to this forum, relationship also discuss in here.....need to use bob marley song la no woman no cruel eh sengaja silap no woman no cry...
Occam's razor (or Ockham's razor) is a principle from philosophy. Suppose there exist two explanations for an occurrence. In this case the simpler one is usually better. Another way of saying it is that the more assumptions you have to make, the more unlikely an explanation is. .............................................................
CRACK SPREAD drop by 4 USD/brl now from 10.5 USD/brl in 2017 (without hurricane effect which shot it to 15 USD/brl almost 1.5 month) to 6.5 USD/brl. Those who closely monitor chart would definitely agree on that.
YOU CAN EVEN TAKE OUT THE INVENTORY BULLSHIT HERE AS CLAIMED BY SOME
IMPORTANT THING IS TAKE NOTE THAT "1 USD/BRL CHANGE" RESULTS WITH 160M IMPACT ON GROSS PROFIT PER ANNUM. .....................................................
Forget about planned shutdown, what about unplanned shutdown?
Before the upgrade work commence, there would be many intermittent short shutdowns to facilitate tie in locations, to clear obstructions to the new upgrade plant facility.
This is what a spinner, will do to create negative news loh...!!
Even in 2015, the shutdown time is not that high, all the work is carried out during the planned shutdown time mah....!!
Planned shutdown every 3 yrs for maintenance is nothing new loh, hengyuan had been doing it the past 60 yrs loh...!!
Spinner probability make it out like a big deal loh...!!
Posted by probability > Apr 22, 2018 10:42 PM | Report Abuse
Forget about planned shutdown, what about unplanned shutdown?
Before the upgrade work commence, there would be many intermittent short shutdowns to facilitate tie in locations, to clear obstructions to the new upgrade plant facility.
Posted by stockraider > Apr 22, 2018 11:04 PM | Report Abuse X
ERRORS in computation by ICON 8818 loh....!!
Below are to key critical success factors to consider loh...!!
Estimating hengyuan earnings: Average Crack spread 2018 lower by about USD 1 to 1.5 per barrel compare to 2017.
However this make up by higher margin of price differentiation between Brent v WTI...of average more than USD 4.5 per barrel...translating to increase margin of about USD 1.5 per barrel.
Increase in sales vol of refined petroleum for Hengyuan 5%
Exceptional gain...in inventory for Hengyuan about Rm 50m
Exceptional gain...in forex due to USD about Rm 30m.
Additional cost on planned shutdown about Rm 30m, which include the loss of production being factored in loh...!!
Higher cost of interest about Rm 15m.
Additional tax of 24% on profit loh.....!!
Based on the info above...the Eps of hengyuan pa work up to roughly Rm 2.00 per share loh....!!
Below is an example of wrong estimation loh:
Occam's razor (or Ockham's razor) is a principle from philosophy. Suppose there exist two explanations for an occurrence. In this case the simpler one is usually better. Another way of saying it is that the more assumptions you have to make, the more unlikely an explanation is. .............................................................
CRACK SPREAD drop by 4 USD/brl now from 10.5 USD/brl in 2017 (without hurricane effect which shot it to 15 USD/brl almost 1.5 month) to 6.5 USD/brl. Those who closely monitor chart would definitely agree on that.
YOU CAN EVEN TAKE OUT THE INVENTORY BULLSHIT HERE AS CLAIMED BY SOME
IMPORTANT THING IS TAKE NOTE THAT "1 USD/BRL CHANGE" RESULTS WITH 160M IMPACT ON GROSS PROFIT PER ANNUM. .....................................................
For the 8 million th time, this inventory gain calculation is wrong! Hengyuan DID NOT earn inventory gain of RM400m. Told you many times already, accounting doesnt work that way. You want to continue claiming that you engineers know how the calculations are done, fine. I wont challenge that. But when it comes to accounting, you are technically wrong.
Bad news for you - accounts are prepared by accountants based on accounting standards, not based on engineering logic. You can argue until the cows come home, your logic will never be reflected in the accounts because accounting wise you are wrong.
Probability is right. I had predicted Q2-17 and Q3-17 EPS correctly based on this assumption.
Q4-17 had deviated significantly from my estimate due to 2 USD/brl refining margin reduction in Q4 compared to Q3, Tax exclusion and maintenance costs.
Probability is right. I had predicted Q2-17 and Q3-17 EPS correctly based on this assumption.
Q4-17 had deviated significantly from my estimate due to 2 USD/brl refining margin reduction in Q4 compared to Q3, Tax exclusion and maintenance costs.
Pple say the methodology is correct means correct lah. Same method got 2 quarters correct. 4Q use same method but actual results different means hengyuan accountants wrong lah.
—————
Posted by stockraider > Apr 23, 2018 12:00 AM | Report Abuse
but what about q4...your prediction is a disaster mah ??
Strange..... I wonder if Probability ever say Q3-17 EPS is high due to Hurricane(thought he say WTI replacing Brent?)? This FutureEyes comment is also doubtful....
Probability's hypothesis is never correct.....He is so wrong each time that actually he is meant to show his hypothesis are all wrong (LOL).....
Probability is right. I had predicted Q2-17 and Q3-17 EPS correctly based on this assumption.
Q4-17 had deviated significantly from my estimate due to 2 USD/brl refining margin reduction in Q4 compared to Q3, Tax exclusion and maintenance costs.
I have to admit i am really quite free now. So i looked up FutureEyes and Icon8818 comments and compare against Probability’s writing style. This is so funny. All 3 are the same. The most glaring similarity is the way all 3 present their calculation. Exactly the same. Not only that, all 3 repeat the same ‘facts’.
Probability. Hahahaha. You created accounts to agree with your own comments. And you did it a few times. Hahahaha. And then there was one you called yourself bro. Hilarious. This is some seriously funny stuff.
This book is the result of the author's many years of experience and observation throughout his 26 years in the stockbroking industry. It was written for general public to learn to invest based on facts and not on fantasies or hearsay....
3iii
12,927 posts
Posted by 3iii > 2018-04-22 19:01 |
Post removed.Why?