The most reliable earnings guidance from Vinh Tan 1 power plant_DK66
Peer comparison is the most reliable and convincing method for making earnings forecast if the subject exhibits the following characteristics;
high degree of earnings stability and foreseeability high degree of resemblance in operating terms and conditions The higher the similarity between the subjects in comparison, the higher the accuracy of forecast.
Hai Duong, Vinh Tan 1, and Mong Duong II are all 100% foreign owned power plants in Vietnam operating under 25 years BOT contracts with capacity around 1,200 MW. All their BOT contracts, power purchase agreements, coal supply agreements were signed around 2012.
Vinh Tan 1 is an extremely close model for Jaks Hai Duong power plant because;
Both were awarded by the Vietnam Government around 2011 Both BOT contracts were signed with the Ministry of Industry and Trade (MOIT). Both are Coal fired power plants costing around US$1.8b Both around 1,200MW capacity Both are 100% foreign owned and operated by Chinese corporations Both are adopting chinese technology Both under 25 years Build-Operate-Transfer (BOT) scheme Both are guaranteed by Vietnam Government Both Power purchase agreements signed with EVN Both coal supply agreements signed with Vinacomin Both under USD1.4b bank financing Both under max 18 years loan tenure allowed by Vietnam government Therefore, Vinh Tan 1 and JHDP should exhibit extreme high resemblance, if not identical.
if your neighbor sold his musang king RM 50 a kilo , then it is very stupid to believe the buyer who told you, your musang king is only worth RM10 a kilo .
Posted by DK66 > May 14, 2020 10:53 PM | Report Abuse
Aseng, Vinh Tan 1 spent USD1.75b and JHDP spent USD1.87b but only generate less than half the profit. Resonable ?
Great !! Since hng33 has conveyed to PBB the relevant articles on their error . Hope they have the guts to admit their error/ oversight and maybe offer their apology to the investing public. Let us await their positive response . Great tribute to Ehome009 for the error discovery and strong backup by DK66 ! And also other supporters . Well done buddies !!
-------------------------------------------------------- Sslee >Dear Aseng, The Value to JAkS by PBB Analyst report of RM 329 million or 0.48 per share is definitely wrong. Wait for their next report upgrade. 15/05/2020 9:15 AM
_________________________________________________________________ Great !! Since hng33 has conveyed to PBB the relevant articles on their error . Hope they have the guts to admit their error/ oversight and maybe offer their apology to the investing public. Let us await their positive response . Great tribute to Ehome009 for the error discovery and strong backup by DK66 ! And also other supporters . Well done buddies !!
The following information is extracted from CGS-CIMB Research Report. For the full research reports and disclaimers, please logon to your account on www.cgs-cimb.com.my and click on <Research> Tab.
huahtai98:- LOL..spot on! all the dumbass naysayers posting shitty, unfounded, ol news to scare people to sell at a lost so that they can buy back cheap..LOL
Haha qqq3, You do not use NTA to value Topglove. Hence basic knowldge you have to use DCF to value assest that give you FCF for 25 years base on a discount rate for inflation.
======
the normal discounting rate used is weighted average cost of capital.
Haha qqq3, You already take profit on your glove stocks. So no worries after they finished goreng and take profit on all the stocks related to COVID-19 they will start goreng stocks with concession assets now paying lower interest expenses thus better profit. =========
I stick with zero earnings zero revenue better than promised the sky and delivers structural / corporate issues.
qqq33333333:- Are you the old, senile fart who recommended JAKS to the whole world saying that JAK'S IPP will make a lot of money? If you're, then thanks because I've already made more than 100% profit on my investment in JAKS and looking to make even more when it hit RM4/5/6.
On a separate note, I can see why you're apprehensive, delusional and bitter about JAK's prospects because you lost badly in JAKS.
KPOWER at RM1.88 is trading at PE of 35 which is stupidly high. If there are clowns like you who can chase KPOWER all the way to RM3.10 at PE of 60, JAKS should also rise likewise..LOL
by johnmasino > May 15, 2020 4:52 PM | Report Abuse
KPOWER at RM1.88 is trading at PE of 35 which is stupidly high. If there are clowns like you who can chase KPOWER all the way to RM3.10 at PE of 60, JAKS should also rise likewise..LOL =========
From 2010 to May 2019, KPOWER was trading between 0.29 to 0.80. All of a sudden, it spiked to 3.10 and you bought at 1.51 thinking it will go beyond 3.51???? LOL!!
This shitty company was making losses for many years and just because it made tiny profits in the past few quarters, you think it can go beyond 3.51???? LOL!!!!!!!!!
What a stupid, delusional thought..
At 3.51, PE is almost 60 for a shitty, loss making company!!
Haha qqq3, I can only give you my advice that you are suffering from:
1. Paranoid personality disorder (PPD) is a mental illness characterized by paranoid delusions, and a pervasive, long-standing suspiciousness and generalized mistrust of others. People with this personality disorder may be hypersensitive, easily insulted, and habitually relate to the world by vigilant scanning of the environment for clues or suggestions that may validate their fears or biases
2. Schizophrenia personality disorder is a mental illness of a type involving a breakdown in the relation between thought, emotion, and behavior, leading to faulty perception, inappropriate actions and feelings, withdrawal from reality and personal relationships into fantasy and delusion, and a sense of mental fragmentation.
3. Onset of Alzheimer is a type of disease that destroys memory and other important mental function causing memory loss as you slowly becoming very forgetful.
You better go cycling often and sleep early and always keep a card with your important information in your wallet in case you forgot who you are or where you live.
DK66:- OTB also mentioned that the IRR should actually be 15% instead of 12% as per his comment to icon888 below. Any thoughts on this? Thanks.
Quote:- OTB Dear Icon8888, During the planning stage, the utilization hours used for planning purpose was 6,500. After the plant is completed, the correct utilization hours used should be 7,238 (same as Vinh Tan 1 power plant). Hence IRR should be 15% instead of 12%. 7,238 utilization hours is confirmed by the management of Jaks to me after checking with CPECC engineers. Please take note. Thank you.
johnmasino, Sslee's article merely trying to show the different effect of Project IRR and Equity IRR on free cash flow with certain assumptions.
OTB indicated that IRR should be 15% based on his confirmation with chinese engineer that JHDP is able to clock 7238 utilisation hours ( same as Vinh Tan 1).
As CEO has indicated that the 12% IRR is based on 6500 hours ( also cited in the government circular), therefore, he said IRR should be 15% as JHDP will have 7238 utilisation hours. It was also reported in the edge weekly that the project IRR is more than 15%.
I agree with OTB's observation.
------------------------------------------- johnmasino DK66:- sslee wrote an article about JAKS 12% IRR. What are your personal thoughts? Thanks! 15/05/2020 5:25 PM
johnmasino DK66:- OTB also mentioned that the IRR should actually be 15% instead of 12% as per his comment to icon888 below. Any thoughts on this? Thanks.
Quote:- OTB Dear Icon8888, During the planning stage, the utilization hours used for planning purpose was 6,500. After the plant is completed, the correct utilization hours used should be 7,238 (same as Vinh Tan 1 power plant). Hence IRR should be 15% instead of 12%. 7,238 utilization hours is confirmed by the management of Jaks to me after checking with CPECC engineers. Please take note. Thank you. 15/05/2020 5:34 PM
This book is the result of the author's many years of experience and observation throughout his 26 years in the stockbroking industry. It was written for general public to learn to invest based on facts and not on fantasies or hearsay....
2721
2,003 posts
Posted by 2721 > 2020-05-15 11:41 | Report Abuse
lai liao lai liao