Read carefully (revenue from 2000 to 2019) and know where the Profit come from?
Aircraft Operating Lease Income
With the purchase of these huge purchase planes to fund their regional ambitions, as stated previously, Airasia, the Group Company now had a new income stream that would grow far more profitable than expected.
It would not be unreasonable to say that by 2016, this has grown to be their second largest revenue and largest profit contributor.
Without it, the Airasia Group would be lossmaking.
Externally, this also caused huge headaches with accusations by GMT Research that Airasia was only profitable due to the leasing of these planes resulting in profit transfers from unprofitable regional Joint Ventures, to the group holding
So are you saying from day 1 they bought over AA they had 2 planes from the beginning and they started leasing out the planes already? How to pay off debts if they do not make money from flying the two planes itself? More importantly how did they able to make money and grow from flying two planes locally and then only expand to other countries? How on earth did they do it in the beginning when they did not lease out the plane? think wisely.
I am saying when AA make billion in 2018: 2017 and 2016: 1,711,405,000: 1,592,004,000: 1,618,558,000. Please know how AA make the money.
And without Aircraft Operating Lease Income can AA make this kind of profit in future when competition is so fierce in low cost budget airlines business? Know why AAX order so many planes and the biggest AAX creditors is airbus?
Only gamblers and the blind invest in AA and AAX hoping they can turn the company around. You can explain 1001 times but it will change their mind, like the crazy Mabel. At least Tony is not as crazy as Karim.
Haha Mabel, You would realise long ago that by her account (Hopefully is her), she practically owns all shares in KLSE and many more in US and HK. So, Serba and AA goes to zero she would have lost 0.1%
I thinkTF is more crazy, cold hearted and treated his own words of refund as worth less than toilet paper to offer 0.5 % to advance ticket holders. The proposed scheme which is now under the supervision of the High Court, travel agents, charter agents, and passengers will receive RM3 million out of the RM599.8 million outstanding accrued liabilities.
By the way my question: Posted by Sslee > Nov 11, 2021 1:00 PM | Report Abuse X
I am saying when AA make billion in 2018: 2017 and 2016: 1,711,405,000: 1,592,004,000: 1,618,558,000. Please know how AA make the money.
And without Aircraft Operating Lease Income can AA make this kind of profit in future when competition is so fierce in low cost budget airlines business? Know why AAX order so many planes and the biggest AAX creditors is airbus?
Hahaha pusing some more caught with pants down. That png link only shows revenue. You can calculate how much without leasing income AA would make or lose with that link? Show me pls. Lol. No dick was right the question is how much is leasing profit. That’s the question. I purposely lure u to come here just to see whether you know the numbers. Very clearly you don’t. Just give 2016 number enough. Show me if you are so clever. Lol. You either talk without knowing the numbers or you mistakenly took leasing revenue as leasing profit. hahaha what a dumbo. Talk kok number 1.
To answer no dick in regards of 2019. AA made loses not because lack of leasing income. It’s because of change of accounting format to mfrs16 instead of 117. Plenty of news and article on it back then. Leasing income is not even an issue here. Unlike sslee put it. First few years is the hardest impact of mfrs16. After that will get better.
Go and read the financial Profit/Loss statement. A. Aircraft Operating Lease Incomes B. Aircraft Operating Lease expenses Then Aircraft Operating Lease profit is A-B
Cannot even tell why 2016 is loss if without leasing income. Just talk only, useless.
Aircraft operating lease income and operating lease expenses are two different things even though they sounded the same. You are so naive. It shows you don’t even know accounting at all.
Aircraft operating lease income = income from leasing planes to others.
Aircraft operating lease expenses = expenses from leasing planes from others.
Two totally different entity. How can u join them together? Dumb enough?
Also if you remove all aircraft operating lease income in 2016 - 2018, AA would still make a profit and not loss like you tried to cheat people.
What a sore loser sslee. Talk cock sing song number 1. King of copy and paste and pusing number 1 also. So hai.
"MFRS137 accounting treatment has resulted in a 43% increase in maintenance and overhaul costs, while MFRS16 adoption negatively impacted the results by RM131 million in FY19," it said.
Since you like to ask people question, I have one for you. Hopefully you are able to answer.
How much did MFRS137 and MFRS16 impact the profit? In other words, if use back old accounting standards, how much would 2019 profit/loss be?
----------
No_Sight To answer no dick in regards of 2019. AA made loses not because lack of leasing income. It’s because of change of accounting format to mfrs16 instead of 117. Plenty of news and article on it back then. Leasing income is not even an issue here. Unlike sslee put it. First few years is the hardest impact of mfrs16. After that will get better. 11/11/2021 7:28 PM
It’s not a pluck here minus there so simple. To have the correct sum you’ll need to be their auditor to access all the transactions related documents. Or try look for news or articles that may have inside info (rough ballpark) that reported on the information.
The only thing i know is that regardless of which format is used, cash inflow / outflow remains unaffected. Means there are no extra cash outflows when mfrs16 is adopted. Just on paper only.
Instead cash from operations (daily business activities cashflow) increased higher in 2019 than in 2018.
2020 would be a more accurate assessment year for their cash generating ability from changing to leasing instead of owning planes but then covid hit. However they’re very likely to be able to maintain their cash generating ability as seen in 2019.
Now that a certain quarter of the government has said to open borders to tourist latest by Jan 1, it’ll bode very well for AA. Unless gov u turn or any unforeseen situation arises.
Many ppl say RI will crash. It already approved today thru EGM. All deals will be completed by December @ rm0.75 per rcuids. See tmr crash or not.
@In_Sight, TQVM for pointing up my mistake. I re-look 2016 AA financial report and managed to collect the following information. So please enlighten me actually AAC aircraft leasing profit is how much for financial year 2016 and 2015? My many thanks you in advance.
During the financial year, the Company novated certain of its aircraft lease arrangements to its subsidiary. Following the novation, the subsidiary became the lessor of the aircraft. Aircraft operating lease income: 2016: RM 1,257,681,000. 2015: RM 1,423,122,000
Asia Aviation Capital Limited (“AAC”) Malaysia 100% owned: Providing aircraft leasing facilities Under Other charges/(expenses): Aircraft operating lease expense charged by Asia Aviation Capital Limited: Company 2016: RM (35,258,000). 2015: RM -
Next time when people tell u something. please listen carefully don't embarrass yourself time and time again. always want to act like pro. copy paste talk kok share false information to cheat people. when I smell bullsh*t I will surely shoot. this is not your first time I thought you would have learned your lesson and be smarter.
"Aircraft operating lease income: 2016: RM 1,257,681,000." This sum is clearly parked under "revenue". Even if you take this sum as "Net profit" of AAC in 2016 AA would still make a profit without it because AA net profit is rm2B for 2016. Simple math also don't know?
When you say AA will make a loss without it you are lying through your crooked teeth.
You want to know how much AAC make in 2015 and 2016? Go look for AAC's financial information for that period. You should've done this before spitting out blatant lies.
Now be a good boy go do your homework and tell us the sum and please back it up with proof and numbers.
p/s: Rights Issue already approved. where are the "RI coming will crash" gang?
Defining a Rights Issue A rights issue is an invitation to existing shareholders to purchase additional new shares in the company. This type of issue gives existing shareholders securities called rights. With the rights, the shareholder can purchase new shares at a discount to the market price on a stated future date. The company is giving shareholders a chance to increase their exposure to the stock at a discount price.
KEY TAKEAWAYS A rights issue is one way for a cash-strapped company to raise capital often to pay down debt. Shareholders can buy new shares at a discount for a certain period. With a rights issue, because more shares are issued to the market, the stock price is diluted and will likely go down. Until the date at which the new shares can be purchased, shareholders may trade the rights on the market the same way that they would trade ordinary shares. The rights issued to a shareholder have value, thus compensating current shareholders for the future dilution of their existing shares' value. Dilution occurs because a rights offering spreads a company’s net profit over a larger number of shares. Thus, the company’s earnings per share, or EPS, decreases as the allocated earnings result in share dilution.
This book is the result of the author's many years of experience and observation throughout his 26 years in the stockbroking industry. It was written for general public to learn to invest based on facts and not on fantasies or hearsay....
strattegist
23,459 posts
Posted by strattegist > 2021-11-11 11:19 | Report Abuse
stable